Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
87 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should there be a boycott of Bill Maher as well? (Original Post) LoZoccolo Mar 2012 OP
Did Maher ask a woman who expressed an opinion Frances Mar 2012 #1
I believe the OP is referring to Maher's defense of Limbaugh. TheWraith Mar 2012 #6
That's not saying he agrees with him Taverner Mar 2012 #24
+1 mac56 Mar 2012 #25
No, it's saying "Hey, let's give him a free pass." TheWraith Mar 2012 #39
I disagree - but to each his own Taverner Mar 2012 #40
He just donated $1 M to Obama's SuperPAC! n/t godai Mar 2012 #2
+1 applegrove Mar 2012 #29
Why? Pisces Mar 2012 #3
He said that people should accept Rush Limbaugh's apology. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #50
Bill Maher Is a Comedian/Entertainer... rsmith6621 Mar 2012 #4
Well, I'd question whether or not he is a comedian tularetom Mar 2012 #19
There already was one. And he lost his show when his sponsors pulled-out. Puregonzo1188 Mar 2012 #5
Yup. Free hand of the market and all. JackintheGreen Mar 2012 #7
No itsrobert Mar 2012 #8
if he were to do something to warrant it, Yes- Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #9
go for it Enrique Mar 2012 #10
maher is on a pay network without advertisers. limbaugh is on public airwaves, big difference. still_one Mar 2012 #11
The magic words are Tu Quoque. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #12
Absolutely. All his advertisers should drop him at once. KamaAina Mar 2012 #13
Should catapulting rightwing propaganda be alertworthy? Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #14
I don't think Bill Maher is on DU. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #15
not relevant Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #22
Oh come on RZM Mar 2012 #27
How is "Bill Maher is not on DU" relevant? Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #44
I'm not talking about that RZM Mar 2012 #47
My hostility is to people here posting rw talking points Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #48
So if the right says something, that should bar anyone on DU from saying it? RZM Mar 2012 #51
No if the marching orders of the day are "deflect from rush to maher" Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #54
Who gives a shit what their 'marching orders' are? RZM Mar 2012 #58
I do. Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #59
*Sigh* RZM Mar 2012 #60
see, people who criticize Maher only do so ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #70
Because he's the one catapulting right-wing talking points now. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #62
*crickets* LOL! Zalatix Mar 2012 #81
Maher's so-called 'sexist' remarks are imaginary and made up by humorless & overly sensitive DU'ers. DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #69
They aren't made up RZM Mar 2012 #76
I'd prefer you start a thread in H&M about it rather than sidetracking this conversation. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #31
too bad for you. Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #32
This message was self-deleted by its author LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #35
If I were to boycott every single person I don't agree with 100% of the time corkhead Mar 2012 #17
Best reply yet! Puzzledtraveller Mar 2012 #56
On what basis? liberal N proud Mar 2012 #18
He said that people should accept Rush Limbaugh's apology. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #21
Well, I'm not going to, so there. Major Hogwash Mar 2012 #26
rush never personally apologized to her madrchsod Mar 2012 #37
I use that word very loosely. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #38
What precedent is there in post-modern media to boycott LanternWaste Mar 2012 #42
Wouldn't there have to be a first precedent? LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #43
As opposed to a second precedent? LanternWaste Mar 2012 #52
I'm saying that the lack of a precedent won't prevent this instance from serving as a precedent. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #61
Primarly for calling women emilyg Mar 2012 #28
I've never heard Maher use the C-word. Ever. DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #71
Educate yourself. He did emilyg Mar 2012 #80
I said *I* never heard him use the C-word. DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #86
I apologize for emilyg Mar 2012 #87
Not if I'm the King of the World. Schema Thing Mar 2012 #20
I kinda already do. Don't have HBO. Probably wouldn't watch him if I did. TheManInTheMac Mar 2012 #23
Here's what you're missing. godai Mar 2012 #30
And that's the main difference between Maher and Limbaugh... Maher's on a subscription service. shcrane71 Mar 2012 #41
i`ve boycotted him since the first show i watched madrchsod Mar 2012 #36
Has Maher stated that taxpayers shouldn't be required to pay for... countryjake Mar 2012 #46
No, Maher says that you should accept Limbaugh's apology. Dr. Strange Mar 2012 #53
Maher says something I don't agree with! The horror! DutchLiberal Mar 2012 #72
Conservatives are free to target his advertisers! sofa king Mar 2012 #49
No. I disagree with Bill on Limbaugh, but I'll still be watching Real Time every week. phleshdef Mar 2012 #55
I already do LadyHawkAZ Mar 2012 #57
Not from my end but I'm not looking to find equilivents for the "fair and balanced" schtick. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #63
Yes GeorgeGist Mar 2012 #64
No. Why should there be? MrSlayer Mar 2012 #65
He said that people should accept Rush Limbaugh's apology. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #66
And that is grounds for boycott? MrSlayer Mar 2012 #73
No TeamsterDem Mar 2012 #67
No. bluedigger Mar 2012 #68
Other than the fact I wouldn't cross the street to piss on him if he were on fire... cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #74
Boycott his sponsors and get him the hell off the public airwaves!!! Iggo Mar 2012 #75
Did Maher call a private citizen woman a slut&prostitute & say he wanted to see videos of her Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #77
He said that people should accept Rush Limbaugh's apology. LoZoccolo Mar 2012 #78
I know. I heard. He's probably relating to the situation, since he's been cancelled for statements Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #79
Useless and counterproductive OP from LoZoccolo. Now, that's a shocker! Comrade Grumpy Mar 2012 #82
No kctim Mar 2012 #83
Doesn't matter because HBO is boycotting me. nt tsuki Mar 2012 #84
That was just Bill being Bill. Islandlife Mar 2012 #85

Frances

(8,547 posts)
1. Did Maher ask a woman who expressed an opinion
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:19 PM
Mar 2012

to make a video of herself having sex and post it online so he and his followers could drool over the video?

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
6. I believe the OP is referring to Maher's defense of Limbaugh.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:21 PM
Mar 2012

Maher said that people should just accept the apology and let the thing drop.

 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
24. That's not saying he agrees with him
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:51 PM
Mar 2012

It's more like "Let's just give Limbaugh some more rope and point him to the rafters"

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
39. No, it's saying "Hey, let's give him a free pass."
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:34 PM
Mar 2012

Maher is saying "Let's abandon the progress we've made this time, for the first time, in getting Limbaugh sent to Coventry."

Response to LoZoccolo (Reply #16)

rsmith6621

(6,942 posts)
4. Bill Maher Is a Comedian/Entertainer...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:20 PM
Mar 2012

...He is kinda a more R rated version of John Stewart.... He also is on Cable.

SO NO.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
19. Well, I'd question whether or not he is a comedian
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:40 PM
Mar 2012

But I agree he shouldn't be boycotted.

Neither should Limbaugh for that matter. It wouldn't do any good. How the hell would someone like me boycott rush limbaugh. I never listen to him in the first place so WTF is going to change. And that's true for most Democrats/"liberals". I agree that calling his sponsors is worthwhile but you gotta know there are plenty of bottom feeder companies just drooling at the chance to get an ad on his crappy show. If he had no sponsors at all the Koch bros. would keep him going just so he could keep oinking out his propaganda.

As far as Maher is concerned he has no sponsors to boycott. If you don't like him don't watch him.

JackintheGreen

(2,036 posts)
7. Yup. Free hand of the market and all.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:23 PM
Mar 2012

If Rush wants advertisers, he'd better stop it with the nip slips. If he thinks he can get a premium channel to pay him for his bilge, let him try. Not only did Maher do it, but so did Howard Stern.

Bluerthanblue

(13,669 posts)
9. if he were to do something to warrant it, Yes-
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:26 PM
Mar 2012

that is the best way we have at our disposal to register our disaproval of what is being done.

It's the power of the people- Boycotts only succeed when the outrage wide-spread, and strongly supported.

still_one

(92,422 posts)
11. maher is on a pay network without advertisers. limbaugh is on public airwaves, big difference.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:27 PM
Mar 2012

However, if you remember when Maher was on politically incorrect, which was commercial, he was boycotted and lost his show

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
12. The magic words are Tu Quoque.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:30 PM
Mar 2012

The correct response is to use those two words, ignore the flying monkeys howling about Maher, and go right back to relentlessly attacking Limbaugh.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
13. Absolutely. All his advertisers should drop him at once.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:32 PM
Mar 2012

Oh, right. His show is on pay cable. My bad.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
27. Oh come on
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:59 PM
Mar 2012

Debate and discussion require looking closely at what the other side says. Occasionally, some people are going to agree with them. It doesn't happen often, but it does happen. While I don't see Maher and Limbaugh's sexist statements as exactly the same, the truth is that Maher has made some questionable statements in the past. And it's not like this is the first we've heard of this. There has been criticism of Maher on DU before - there are posters here who don't much care for him and have never been shy about saying that.

But now that Limbaugh's in trouble and the right is pointing the finger at Maher, those who don't approve of Maher should have posts hidden or possibly even tombstoned? That makes no sense. If it was ok to criticize Maher two years ago, why shouldn't it be ok to do so now? You shouldn't let what the right says determine what you think.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
47. I'm not talking about that
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:12 PM
Mar 2012

I'm talking about your hostility to criticism of Maher because the right is doing it too. Maher has taken criticism from the left for a while now. That shouldn't change just because Rush Limbaugh is in trouble too.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
48. My hostility is to people here posting rw talking points
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:14 PM
Mar 2012

either deliberately or because they are clueless.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
51. So if the right says something, that should bar anyone on DU from saying it?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:21 PM
Mar 2012

Like I said, criticism of Maher's statements about women on DU predates this particular talking point. So who cares if the right is criticizing him now too?

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
54. No if the marching orders of the day are "deflect from rush to maher"
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:32 PM
Mar 2012

and numerous posts sprout up deflecting from rush to maher I will get rather pissed of at the people who, naively or otherwise, are helping out the cause. Because I despise the cause they are helping.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
58. Who gives a shit what their 'marching orders' are?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:42 PM
Mar 2012

It's natural for DU to talk about Maher here. For one, like I said, it's a topic that's come up before. Two, it can get boring talking about Rush and only Rush. It's natural for people to contextualize things and move the topic in different directions.

Not everything that happens is because of what the right says and does. The left has it's own issues with Maher and right now, when the sexism of commentators is in the news, is a natural time for that to come back to the surface.

In fact, you could actually stand your argument on its head. Perhaps one of the reasons the right is singling out Maher is because they know that some on the left already had issues with him. You could argue that left-wing criticism of Maher is what made this 'talking point' viable in the first place.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
60. *Sigh*
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:58 PM
Mar 2012

Isn't it a bit insulting to tell people who have legitimate concerns with Maher that they shouldn't be expressing those because the right is criticizing him too? It's also a bit self-important as well, as if you're entitled to lecture people on what they should or shouldn't be saying.

ProdigalJunkMail

(12,017 posts)
70. see, people who criticize Maher only do so
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:29 PM
Mar 2012

at the behest of the right wind...the fact that he is, at times, a misogynistic pig couldn't possibly be the reason...

especially to some on this board...

sP

 

Zalatix

(8,994 posts)
81. *crickets* LOL!
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 02:45 PM
Mar 2012

A lot of people should be wiping some egg off their faces after Bill Maher started defending Limbaugh's "apology".

 

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)
69. Maher's so-called 'sexist' remarks are imaginary and made up by humorless & overly sensitive DU'ers.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:25 PM
Mar 2012

There are just some people who seem to think women should always be exempt of being made fun of. Making fun of men is okay, to them, but mention a woman and a punchline and they throw a fit...

In all the years I've watched Bill Maher, I've seen him stand up for women's rights time and again, including the past few weeks, when he railed against the Republicans' intentions to regulate a woman's choice on abortion and contraception. To say he's sexist just because he makes jokes about women now and then is a bit ridiculous.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
76. They aren't made up
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:00 PM
Mar 2012

He referred to Sarah Palin as a 'cunt' and a 'dumb twat' in his stand up act. Is that sexist? I would probably say so. I can't say I'm particularly offended by those terms, but I acknowledge that some people are and I respect their feelings on the matter.

http://www.dallasvoice.com/maher-your-beautiful-theater-gonna-long-1070487.html

Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #22)

Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #22)

Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #22)

Response to Warren Stupidity (Reply #22)

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
17. If I were to boycott every single person I don't agree with 100% of the time
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:39 PM
Mar 2012

I am going to be awfully lonely.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
26. Well, I'm not going to, so there.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 01:56 PM
Mar 2012

I don't watch HBO, so I don't watch Maher.
And I don't care for him, and never did.
He supported Nader in 2000, so I stopped watching him long before he was fired from that one show he had on ABC or CBS back in 2001.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
42. What precedent is there in post-modern media to boycott
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:43 PM
Mar 2012

What precedent is there in post-modern media to boycott a person who suggests his viewership accept an apology.

I imagine that whatever the answer(s) we find to that will imply at least one (of many) answers to your most sincere and genuine of queries.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
52. As opposed to a second precedent?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:25 PM
Mar 2012

"Wouldn't there have to be a first precedent..."

As opposed to a second precedent?

 

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)
71. I've never heard Maher use the C-word. Ever.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:32 PM
Mar 2012

Well, one time, but he was quoting somebody else. He was criticizing (get that, criticizing) the 1950's sitcoms in which men treated women like their subordinates. He was expressing amazement at how it was funny to audiences back then that Ralph Kramden would imply he was gonna beat his wife Alice if she didn't shut up. He was standing up for women in that instance (part of one of his stand-up routines), like he has been doing the past few weeks, against Republicans who want to control women's uteruses.

The B-word... well, he used it as much as he used the D-word (dick) for men, but nobody ever complains about that. It's okay to call men all kinds of shitty names (pig, swine, jackass, asshole), we all know that...

 

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)
86. I said *I* never heard him use the C-word.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 06:59 PM
Mar 2012

So you can keep the condescending tone to yourself.

It turns out he did. Was that tasteful and do I support it? No. Do I think that single instant automatically renders him a sexist and misogynyst? I don't.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
41. And that's the main difference between Maher and Limbaugh... Maher's on a subscription service.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:42 PM
Mar 2012

I really, really, really don't understand why Limbaugh hasn't been fined yet by the FCC. If Limbaugh wants to on a 9 hour tirade that demonizes a woman, he's more than free to do that on subscription stations. It's a completely different beast when someone is on broadcast stations, or am I just entirely missing something here?

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
36. i`ve boycotted him since the first show i watched
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 02:31 PM
Mar 2012

in fact i watched about ten minutes and changed the channel.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
46. Has Maher stated that taxpayers shouldn't be required to pay for...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:11 PM
Mar 2012

single, horny college girls wishing to engage in promiscuity?

Has Maher implied that women should NEVER have sex, unless they intend to reproduce?

Has Maher pretended that the left are hypocrites for expressing outrage over the blatant attack that right wing-nuts are waging against the women of this nation?

I've never watched Maher's program and I don't intend to, anytime soon, but no, a boycott of "Real Time" would not do much to stop the current steamrolling that Republicans are engaged in, in their drive to send Women's Rights back to the Stone Age.

Are YOU cool with vile mouthpieces of Rethug idealogy, like Limbaugh, Palin, or Beck, trying desperately to deflect criticism of their obvious war on women?

 

DutchLiberal

(5,744 posts)
72. Maher says something I don't agree with! The horror!
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:36 PM
Mar 2012

Seriously, if I had to boycott Maher everytime I didn't agree with him...

I didn't agree with him on his initial stances on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict and Venezuela (he has come around on those) and I still don't agree with him on capital punishment, but why should we shut out everybody we don't agree with 100%?

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
49. Conservatives are free to target his advertisers!
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:15 PM
Mar 2012

Of which there are none, but that will be a long and painful learning process for them.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
55. No. I disagree with Bill on Limbaugh, but I'll still be watching Real Time every week.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:32 PM
Mar 2012

Its one of the best political shows on television. Theres no way I'm gonna not watch it.

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
57. I already do
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 03:40 PM
Mar 2012

and it has nothing to do with Limbaugh. I find him repulsive so I don't watch.

Kinda a shame, because I loved Religulous and agree with him on a lot of issues. I just find his humor to be not very humorous.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
65. No. Why should there be?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 07:49 PM
Mar 2012

Besides, the only way to boycott is not to watch his show and I certainly will not be joining in that.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
73. And that is grounds for boycott?
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:16 PM
Mar 2012

It's grounds for me to say I think he's wrong but is not a boycott level offense.

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
68. No.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 08:00 PM
Mar 2012

I don't agree with his tweets re: Rush, but he has been on the receiving end of this sort of thing himself, and probably has a bit different perspective on it. I expect he will share that in more depth than tweets allow in the near future.

 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
74. Other than the fact I wouldn't cross the street to piss on him if he were on fire...
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:22 PM
Mar 2012

I'm conflicted about whether or not to boycott him.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
77. Did Maher call a private citizen woman a slut&prostitute & say he wanted to see videos of her
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:08 PM
Mar 2012

having sex?

Was Maher the defacto head of the Democratic Party at the time he said those things?

If so, then yes, he should be boycotted. If not, then no.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
79. I know. I heard. He's probably relating to the situation, since he's been cancelled for statements
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 11:17 PM
Mar 2012

And he's a bit sexist.

But he's not the one who did the deed, as they say. And he didn't say Limpballs was right in what he said. So, no, I wouldn't boycot him.

Islandlife

(212 posts)
85. That was just Bill being Bill.
Thu Mar 8, 2012, 03:09 PM
Mar 2012

Perhaps we are able to accept his vulgarities and ad homonem arguments because we hold Bill to a "lesser" standard of reporting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should there be a boycott...