Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun Nut Nation erupts again (Original Post) MrScorpio Nov 2013 OP
Are we obliged to hear about every incident? flamingdem Nov 2013 #1
I wish you had stuck a... Walk away Nov 2013 #3
There was a great piece posted Mojorabbit Nov 2013 #36
While we ignore the vastly more common "ordinary" murders. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #8
gun nuts kardonb Nov 2013 #22
An active shooter in a large shopping mall is news. Suburban Warrior Nov 2013 #2
And our veterans returning from combat abroad are coming home to this pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #4
That was my thought. At least downrange it giftedgirl77 Nov 2013 #5
Why are they so confused? What's the difference between invading the wrong country... Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #10
How to deal with such a clueless response? pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #12
The last 50 or so years of the US Armed Forces is basically one gigantic mass shooting... Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #16
Connecting your historic argument to homeland gun violence is ludicrous. nt pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #18
When jingoism becomes an important aspect of national identity... Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #19
Jingoism won't suffice to explain gun violence here pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #20
Well, obviously jingoism alone is not the only variable. But it's certainly an important one. Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #24
Warn them about why they were sent to war? ROFL! pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #35
The same argument was made in Bowling for Columbine RZM Nov 2013 #23
Why exactly is it nonsense? Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #25
I don't think it's here or there for most people RZM Nov 2013 #28
I bet it feels good to call them gangbangers and nut jobs. Helps distance the rest of us from them. Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #29
But that's what they are RZM Nov 2013 #32
You realize there were spree killers in the 40s and 50s, right? Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #33
No one will ban guns. Not even a majority of Americans want guns.... Logical Nov 2013 #6
majority of americasn DO NOT support banning guns beachbum bob Nov 2013 #37
Quick! Somebody find middle ground! MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #7
The sensible solution is of course to try to cut killing sprees in half Dragonfli Nov 2013 #9
Thanks vlakitti Nov 2013 #31
You mean that mis-labeled "middle ground" way over there on the right, Manny? villager Nov 2013 #30
Context or at least a quick linkie???? TIA madinmaryland Nov 2013 #11
Here maddezmom Nov 2013 #13
Beat me to it, maddezmom pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #15
West gate mall and Paramus NJ nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #17
yup, we'll never learn. gopiscrap Nov 2013 #14
Isn't H. Rap in the slammer for gun violence? n/t RZM Nov 2013 #21
Aren't cherries of Middle Eastern origin? nt Deep13 Nov 2013 #26
the NRA wants everyone armed and paranoid Skittles Nov 2013 #27
if you kill one person you're a murderer,but if you kill many you're a conqueror. urbuddha Nov 2013 #34
Nutters always have the spotlight too. Fucking nutters. lonestarnot Nov 2013 #38

flamingdem

(39,325 posts)
1. Are we obliged to hear about every incident?
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 11:51 PM
Nov 2013

It seems like the networks and cable feel they have to drop everything just in case they miss the story.

I think this increases the incidents of copycats.

Mojorabbit

(16,020 posts)
36. There was a great piece posted
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 03:19 AM
Nov 2013

that stated just this. Televising it and making a fuss over the perp is the worst thing the media can do. It brings out people who desire the same out of the woodwork.
Let me see if I can find. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/media/2012/07/how-media-shouldnt-cover-mass-murder
exerpt:
If you don't want to propagate more mass murders...

Don't start the story with sirens blaring.

Don't have photographs of the killer.

Don't make this 24/7 coverage.

Do everything you can not to make the body count the lead story.

Not to make the killer some kind of anti-hero.

Do localise this story to the affected community and as boring as possible in every other market.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
8. While we ignore the vastly more common "ordinary" murders.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 12:36 AM
Nov 2013

Those aren't news...they mostly happen to "those people."

 

kardonb

(777 posts)
22. gun nuts
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:01 AM
Nov 2013

why do you think these crazies do it ? BECAUSE the media just gobbles this crap up , it fills the pages and airwaves . AND the ;perpetrator gets "famous " .

 

giftedgirl77

(4,713 posts)
5. That was my thought. At least downrange it
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 12:17 AM
Nov 2013

was normal for me to tell a young Soldier to stand on the other side of a concrete barrier to avoid the sniper fire while we were waiting for our ride. I don't want to raise my kids that way too.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
10. Why are they so confused? What's the difference between invading the wrong country...
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:09 AM
Nov 2013

and gunning down a bunch of innocent people, or at the very least endorsing and working to build up such a system of killings, and going to the local mall and gunning down a bunch of innocent people?

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
12. How to deal with such a clueless response?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:19 AM
Nov 2013

U.S. troops in combat abroad are facing armed opponents, primarily. Regardless of the politics, that is their reality.

And you're comparing that to a mass killer or would-be mass killer in a mall? Major fail.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
16. The last 50 or so years of the US Armed Forces is basically one gigantic mass shooting...
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:25 AM
Nov 2013

Using variously sized weaponry ranging from small arms to MOABs. The only difference really being that it was and continues to be for economic and political gain as opposed to the insane delusion of one psychotic individual. Oh yeah, and we kill other civilian populations as opposed to our own.

I say again, veterans returning from illegitimate wars and occupations should not be the least bit surprised that similar acts of militancy are now taking place on our own soil.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
19. When jingoism becomes an important aspect of national identity...
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:35 AM
Nov 2013

the violence will find its way to our shores. It will find its way into our local communities. It will find its way into our lives one way or another.

Most of these spree killers demonstrate the same tactics and weaponry as our own armed forces. You think that's a coincidence? Think again.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
20. Jingoism won't suffice to explain gun violence here
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:54 AM
Nov 2013

And your jaundiced view of the actions of U.S. trooops in combat won't serve you well in trying to make your argument. There are vets here who have actually served in combat, who know better.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
24. Well, obviously jingoism alone is not the only variable. But it's certainly an important one.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:04 AM
Nov 2013

Without it, we would not have an entire subfield of tactical weaponry. We likely wouldn't have such a common disregard for human life.

I'd be terribly interested in learning what wars these members fought in. Although I must warn them that very few conflicts involving the US Armed Forces in the 20th or 21st century were or are justified.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
35. Warn them about why they were sent to war? ROFL!
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 03:16 AM
Nov 2013

I'll guarantee you that they have given a lot more thought to that than you have. They also have a much better understanding of why they did what they did when facing armed conmbatants.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
23. The same argument was made in Bowling for Columbine
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:04 AM
Nov 2013

That violence such as the bombing campaign in Bosnia was connected to gun violence here.

I agree it's nonsense, but it's not an unheard of argument.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
25. Why exactly is it nonsense?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:05 AM
Nov 2013

What do we teach our children when we invade unsuspecting countries, bomb their infrastructure to pieces and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people?

You don't think that has negative consequences on the psyches of the young and impressionable?

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
28. I don't think it's here or there for most people
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:11 AM
Nov 2013

Maybe a small effect. But I don't think your average nutjob or gangbanger gives Iraq much thought when pulling the trigger.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
29. I bet it feels good to call them gangbangers and nut jobs. Helps distance the rest of us from them.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:20 AM
Nov 2013

It helps us erase the uncomfortable connections between our prolific world-wide military violence and our home grown military-like violence.

We have armies, be them gangs or police departments, and rogues, people suffering psychotic episodes or otherwise, on our own soil and they are every bit as tactical and grisly as our own armed forces.

You think that's coincidence? You think surrounding youth with violence, state sanctioned or otherwise, doesn't fuck with their heads?

Explosives, tactical vests, guerrilla tactics, assault weapons. All sourced from the military and blown up to unimaginable proportions in the media and in movies and television shows.

The United States is the biggest military state on the planet. You're deluded if you don't think our own issues with violence aren't connected to that fact.

 

RZM

(8,556 posts)
32. But that's what they are
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:35 AM
Nov 2013

If you shoot up a mall, you're a nut. If you pop a cap in someone because you don't get along with their crew, you're a banger.

It's not complicated.

I see the point you are making, I just don't buy it. By that logic the late 40s and 50s should have been chock full of gunplay with the examples set by the violence done in WWII and Korea.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
33. You realize there were spree killers in the 40s and 50s, right?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:39 AM
Nov 2013

There were gangs and police departments ripe with corruption and violence, too.

Although one must also address the reality that an entire subcategory of tactical weaponry was not available to the general public 60 years ago. The proliferation of military style weaponry along with the explosion of the corporate military state is certainly not helping.

 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
6. No one will ban guns. Not even a majority of Americans want guns....
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 12:21 AM
Nov 2013

Banned. And if people have possession of guns, some will be used to kill people!

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
37. majority of americasn DO NOT support banning guns
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 06:55 AM
Nov 2013

the support banning certain type of guns/weapons and accessories. I have been a legal gun owning liberal for 40 yrs and the problem is not gun ownership....what we have been experiencing is non-stop crazy from the media enhancing a social breakdown. Anger is being fueled non-stop and too many people can not cope with it.

Other countries have citizens who own weapons and they do not have the level of violence we have. Address what is causing the violence if you want to see a reduction of violent acts.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
9. The sensible solution is of course to try to cut killing sprees in half
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:07 AM
Nov 2013

Any misguided leftwingnut efforts to reduce them any more than that would be extreme and therefore cause more death. The answer is always in the middle of left/right right/wrong good/evil

It is an axiom that is plain as day to the sensible among us!

 

villager

(26,001 posts)
30. You mean that mis-labeled "middle ground" way over there on the right, Manny?
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:25 AM
Nov 2013

The one that conservatives and rightwingers use as a fig leaf for their political views?

urbuddha

(363 posts)
34. if you kill one person you're a murderer,but if you kill many you're a conqueror.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 02:51 AM
Nov 2013

It is all bad any way you look at it. The labels society pins on these
killings and the attention they receive don't help. We somehow have
to find a way to combat the NRA. You must have a license to drive a
car but you don't need one to buy a gun. This is just crazy. We are
letting the gun lobbyists ruin America.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gun Nut Nation erupts aga...