General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHistoric Pro-Choice Bill To Be Introduced In Congress
posted: 11/13/2013 10:03 am EST | Updated: 11/13/2013 12:27 pm EST
Following an unprecedented three-year wave of state legislative attacks on abortion and family planning services, a group of Democratic lawmakers in the House and Senate plan to go on the offensive Wednesday with a historic bill that would make it illegal for states to chip away at women's reproductive rights.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) will introduce the Women's Health Protection Act of 2013, joined by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and Reps. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), Judy Chu (D-Calif.) and Lois Frankel (D-Fla.). The bill would prohibit states from passing so-called Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws, which impose strict and cost-prohibitive building standards on abortion clinics, require women seeking abortions to have ultrasounds, and create other barriers to abortion access.
SNIP/
"In states like Texas and Wisconsin, legislatures are passing bills with the false pretext of protecting health when their only objective is to obstruct and curtail access to safe and legal abortions and reproductive services. These laws are largely unconstitutional, and some measure of certainty and clarity is required to preempt these regulations and laws so women are not deterred in their very personal decisions based on their own values on how they want to use their constitutional rights," Blumenthal said. "The Womens Health Protection Act will provide a clear and certain response to these regulations and laws that impose unnecessary tests, procedures and restrictions including requirements for physical layout in clinics on reproductive services."
Blumenthal's bill wouldn't automatically overturn states' existing anti-abortion laws, but because federal law trumps state law, it would provide a means to challenge them in court. The bill would direct judges to consider certain factors in determining whether a restriction is legal, such as whether it interferes with a doctor's good-faith medical judgment, or whether it's likely to interfere with or delay women's access to abortion.
MORE/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/pro-choice-bill-womens-health-protection-act_n_4266599.html
Our Bodies Ourselves! Vote for it 2014!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)I love it!
The people strike back!
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)it gives us further incentive to work the election next year to get us decent House where it won't die in committee..
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)we have to get the House back and keep the Senate.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)I don't know if the Fed can pass something that says "Hey, that law you passed 2 years ago? Uh uh. Repeal it."
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)as the House votes to scrap Obamacare. That's red meat for the reich wing, this is the same for us.
Not going anywhere, and I just don't see how we get the House back any time soon. Barack Obama will never again be at the top of a ticket, and even when he was in 2012, we still couldn't make the gains we did in 2008.
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)sheshe2
(83,791 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Thanks for posting some good news.
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)rurallib
(62,423 posts)sheshe2
(83,791 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)So uplifting to read about this.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)whttevrr
(2,345 posts)I think this country would be much better off with Republicans in the minority.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)1. Raise Minimum Wage
2. Strength ACA
3. Get Government out Of women's Health
4. marriage equality
5. Legalize Marijuana
The Candidate that runs on that platform Could win crazy big
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)6: End corporate welfare
7: Overturn Citizens United
8: ALL income taxed at the same rate as paycheck-wages
9: End tax credits for job off-shoring
10: 60% marginal tax rate for income over $100 million/year until the debt is paid off.
11: End the warmongering.
ColumbusLib
(158 posts)Love this 5 point platform!
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)yes
HijackedLabel
(80 posts)Now this.
I'm glad some of them are finally being the populists of which we all knew they were capable of being.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but I'm also worried about the timing. Do they have to put an opening in it so states can take it to court or is that because it helps insure its passage even though the courts can disallow it? That's why I'm concerned about the timing.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)sheshe2
(83,791 posts)United we stand....
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)Democrats with some spine standing up for the party's values is what I like to see.
Wounded Bear
(58,666 posts)But I fucking love it. Just fucking LOVE it!'
Put every goddamn Republican on record that they stopped or opposed this one.
Come 2014, a chorus of, "He/she voted against a woman's right to health care."
Go Dems!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It won't even make it to a floor vote.
LostOne4Ever
(9,289 posts)About time we took the fight to them!
We got to get the vote out in 2014
cali
(114,904 posts)regardless of its chances of passage.
thanks for posting
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)And politicians are NOT all "lying bums".
THANK YOU, Senators!
SunSeeker
(51,571 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,692 posts)I've read that Pope Francis has had something to do with that.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)Which bill has a chance-in-hell of being brought to the floor of the House for a vote?