Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(83,791 posts)
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 08:44 PM Nov 2013

Historic Pro-Choice Bill To Be Introduced In Congress

posted: 11/13/2013 10:03 am EST | Updated: 11/13/2013 12:27 pm EST

Following an unprecedented three-year wave of state legislative attacks on abortion and family planning services, a group of Democratic lawmakers in the House and Senate plan to go on the offensive Wednesday with a historic bill that would make it illegal for states to chip away at women's reproductive rights.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) will introduce the Women's Health Protection Act of 2013, joined by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) and Reps. Marcia Fudge (D-Ohio), Judy Chu (D-Calif.) and Lois Frankel (D-Fla.). The bill would prohibit states from passing so-called Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws, which impose strict and cost-prohibitive building standards on abortion clinics, require women seeking abortions to have ultrasounds, and create other barriers to abortion access.

SNIP/

"In states like Texas and Wisconsin, legislatures are passing bills with the false pretext of protecting health when their only objective is to obstruct and curtail access to safe and legal abortions and reproductive services. These laws are largely unconstitutional, and some measure of certainty and clarity is required to preempt these regulations and laws so women are not deterred in their very personal decisions based on their own values on how they want to use their constitutional rights," Blumenthal said. "The Women’s Health Protection Act will provide a clear and certain response to these regulations and laws that impose unnecessary tests, procedures and restrictions — including requirements for physical layout in clinics — on reproductive services."

Blumenthal's bill wouldn't automatically overturn states' existing anti-abortion laws, but because federal law trumps state law, it would provide a means to challenge them in court. The bill would direct judges to consider certain factors in determining whether a restriction is legal, such as whether it interferes with a doctor's good-faith medical judgment, or whether it's likely to interfere with or delay women's access to abortion.

MORE/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/13/pro-choice-bill-womens-health-protection-act_n_4266599.html

Our Bodies Ourselves! Vote for it 2014!

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Historic Pro-Choice Bill To Be Introduced In Congress (Original Post) sheshe2 Nov 2013 OP
Oh, wonderful! Go at them hard and fast! CTyankee Nov 2013 #1
We can only hope this doesn't die in committee in the House, and... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #2
Can't they bring it back after 2014 assuming the Dems take the house and Senate? Heather MC Nov 2013 #12
Sure-- that's my point, but... TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #14
... would it be retroactive to all the existing shit laws being passed at the state level? Myrina Nov 2013 #28
This will be as effective customerserviceguy Nov 2013 #31
very pleased to be the first to k&R hlthe2b Nov 2013 #3
Thank you for the first rec, hlthe2b! sheshe2 Nov 2013 #6
Very happy to see Tammy Baldwin's name on this. I will be following its progress. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #4
Love Tammy, thank you Peace Nikki! sheshe2 Nov 2013 #7
reccing for all the women in my life. rurallib Nov 2013 #5
Oh. I am with you on that one, rurullib! nt sheshe2 Nov 2013 #8
What? We're going on the offensive? How long have I been sleeping? JudyM Nov 2013 #9
k&r n/t RainDog Nov 2013 #10
America needs a massive Get Out The Vote campaign for 2014 whttevrr Nov 2013 #11
we have our winning talking points Heather MC Nov 2013 #13
I would add to that: FoxNewsSucks Nov 2013 #15
Yes! ColumbusLib Nov 2013 #16
yes arely staircase Nov 2013 #17
First, the $10.10 min. wage. HijackedLabel Nov 2013 #18
I'm all for it... defacto7 Nov 2013 #19
... freshwest Nov 2013 #20
Thanks, freshwest~ sheshe2 Nov 2013 #21
Oh, hell yeah! Jamastiene Nov 2013 #22
Obviously, this will go nowhere this session.... Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #23
I'm glad it's being introduced, but I agree there's really no way it will go anywhere davidpdx Nov 2013 #33
Kick ass LostOne4Ever Nov 2013 #24
that is great news. It's just the sort of legislation that's desperately needed cali Nov 2013 #25
This is exactly what's needed. HappyMe Nov 2013 #26
another example--democrats are NOTHING like repukes. BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2013 #27
Yes! A good offense is the best defense. nt SunSeeker Nov 2013 #29
With so many states over=turning gay marriage acts this year, it seems a good time lindysalsagal Nov 2013 #30
... and a Repub bill will de-fund ObamaCare JustABozoOnThisBus Nov 2013 #32
K&R Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #34

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
2. We can only hope this doesn't die in committee in the House, and...
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 08:48 PM
Nov 2013

it gives us further incentive to work the election next year to get us decent House where it won't die in committee..

Myrina

(12,296 posts)
28. ... would it be retroactive to all the existing shit laws being passed at the state level?
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:41 PM
Nov 2013

I don't know if the Fed can pass something that says "Hey, that law you passed 2 years ago? Uh uh. Repeal it."


customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
31. This will be as effective
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:16 AM
Nov 2013

as the House votes to scrap Obamacare. That's red meat for the reich wing, this is the same for us.

Not going anywhere, and I just don't see how we get the House back any time soon. Barack Obama will never again be at the top of a ticket, and even when he was in 2012, we still couldn't make the gains we did in 2008.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
4. Very happy to see Tammy Baldwin's name on this. I will be following its progress.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 08:49 PM
Nov 2013

Thanks for posting some good news.

JudyM

(29,251 posts)
9. What? We're going on the offensive? How long have I been sleeping?
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:18 PM
Nov 2013

So uplifting to read about this.

whttevrr

(2,345 posts)
11. America needs a massive Get Out The Vote campaign for 2014
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:25 PM
Nov 2013

I think this country would be much better off with Republicans in the minority.

 

Heather MC

(8,084 posts)
13. we have our winning talking points
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:34 PM
Nov 2013

1. Raise Minimum Wage
2. Strength ACA
3. Get Government out Of women's Health
4. marriage equality
5. Legalize Marijuana


The Candidate that runs on that platform Could win crazy big

FoxNewsSucks

(10,434 posts)
15. I would add to that:
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:16 PM
Nov 2013

6: End corporate welfare
7: Overturn Citizens United
8: ALL income taxed at the same rate as paycheck-wages
9: End tax credits for job off-shoring
10: 60% marginal tax rate for income over $100 million/year until the debt is paid off.
11: End the warmongering.

 

HijackedLabel

(80 posts)
18. First, the $10.10 min. wage.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:19 PM
Nov 2013

Now this.

I'm glad some of them are finally being the populists of which we all knew they were capable of being.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
19. I'm all for it...
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:42 PM
Nov 2013

but I'm also worried about the timing. Do they have to put an opening in it so states can take it to court or is that because it helps insure its passage even though the courts can disallow it? That's why I'm concerned about the timing.

Wounded Bear

(58,666 posts)
23. Obviously, this will go nowhere this session....
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 05:32 AM
Nov 2013

But I fucking love it. Just fucking LOVE it!'

Put every goddamn Republican on record that they stopped or opposed this one.

Come 2014, a chorus of, "He/she voted against a woman's right to health care."

Go Dems!

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
33. I'm glad it's being introduced, but I agree there's really no way it will go anywhere
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 01:24 AM
Nov 2013

It won't even make it to a floor vote.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
25. that is great news. It's just the sort of legislation that's desperately needed
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 05:46 AM
Nov 2013

regardless of its chances of passage.

thanks for posting

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
27. another example--democrats are NOTHING like repukes.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:20 AM
Nov 2013

And politicians are NOT all "lying bums".

THANK YOU, Senators!

lindysalsagal

(20,692 posts)
30. With so many states over=turning gay marriage acts this year, it seems a good time
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:49 PM
Nov 2013

I've read that Pope Francis has had something to do with that.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,350 posts)
32. ... and a Repub bill will de-fund ObamaCare
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 09:21 AM
Nov 2013

Which bill has a chance-in-hell of being brought to the floor of the House for a vote?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Historic Pro-Choice Bill ...