= new reply since forum marked as read
Maybe try a [font size=5]bigger font.[/font]
Now I'm just going to sit back and watch people get mad at you some more. 
She supported him in '08. She supported him in '12. And, on the occasion that there is something positive to say, she says it.
But yelling and attacking the messenger is sure a powerful distraction from the point. 
Lame.
"I want people to oppose the President's corporate sell out."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024031329#post2
Be happy!
Guess I was wrong! 
Got anything else?
Reminds me of a neighbor ranting about "ObamaPhones". Yeah. That bad.
Obama phones!!!
I will, however, take a stab at defending the President, here.
Here's what I can say:
I like second term Barack Obama a lot better than first term Barack Obama. Now that he's "settled into the job," so to speak, and now that he's freed from worrying about his re-election, he has become a better President. Take Syria, for example. From what I can tell, he was under serious pressure to invade Syria for several years. Our Western European allies wanted it. They're almost completely dependent on natural gas from Russia, and they don't like that. They wanted a pipeline trough Syria to the Mediterranean to bring natural gas from northern Iraq just to ease the pressure of Russia's monopoly. Despite this intense pressure, the President delayed, and when the matter came to a crisis, he managed to keep us out of war. That was impressive, but it seems to be his MO in regards to actions he does not want to take. He delays, and then waits for the right moment to blow up the whole idea.
That's what I am hoping for with the TPP. He may not actually like it, but he's under intense pressure to do it from both our oligarchs and from powerful members of the Party that he leads. Perhaps he's keeping his options open, saying the right things to our oligarchs and to the party faithful who want the TPP, but then quietly gumming up the works behind the scenes. I recall that he was recently scheduled to meet in Asia regarding the TPP, but, somehow, he found an excuse not to go (it may have been the Syria crisis). In any event, I suspect (when I am feeling generous) that the President may, indeed, oppose the TPP. He may simply be delaying and waiting for the right moment to blow up the negotiations and take it off the table, as he did with plans to invade Syria.
That's as much as I can do on this. Of course, if he ends up signing the TPP in something close to its present form, I'll be furious, and I will regret having given him the benefit of the doubt, but, at this moment in time, I am willing to wait and see how this plays out. That said, I encourage all of us to keep our eyes on this and to agitate--i.e. give the President cover in the event that he sees an opportunity to back out.
-Laelth
But what would happen if he did?
He'd split the Party. He'd alienate big donors. He'd hurt Democrats running for office up and down the ticket--from dog catcher to our next candidate for President. He is, after all, the leader of the Party, and, I must say, he has been excellent in that role.
People have different personalities, and the President is no exception. His style is to hide what he thinks and to work behind the scenes to insure 1) that most people are happy with him and like him, 2) that he doesn't hurt the Democratic Party, 3) that policy he supports moves forward and is acted upon, and 4) that policy he rejects never comes to fruition. All the while (for category #4) he listens carefully to those who support the policy and treats them respectfully (to insure #1 and #2), but then he delays, gums up the works, speaks softly on the subject, and waits for the right opportunity to blow up the ideas and proposals upon which he does not want to act. He's good at this. I respect and admire it. He's a good politician.
Now, whether he's actually in favor of the core principles of the TPP, I have no idea. Nor does anyone else. The President holds his cards very close to his chest, but the fact that the TPP has been repeatedly delayed and obstructed gives me some hope that the President actually opposes it, and is dealing with it in a way consistent with other policy proposals that he did not like--such as invading Syria.
For what that's worth.
-Laelth
What I am suggesting is that the President may be standing with the 99% in his own way. As I said above, I will be furious if he signs the TPP in its present form, but he may be simply protecting the Party by offering tepid support while working behind the scenes to blow it up. That does appear to be his MO in regards to policy that he does not like.
-Laelth
I have no idea what the President is really thinking. That said, I don't think we will ever get the kind of bold and confrontational leadership you describe from this President.
It's just not his style (and if I had to combat the "angry black man" stereotype all my life, I suspect my style would be similar).
She's not afraid to fight back.
At this point, however, after watching him for five years, I am coming to the conclusion that Barack Obama fights behind the scenes, rather than in public, and he simply does not let the public know what he's thinking and doing. This is very frustrating for those of us who are interested and want to know what's going on, but what can we do? This may simply be the President's leadership style. It's not going to change at this point.
-Laelth
Our allies were pressuring him to go to war--Cameron, in particular. When Cameron was sabotaged by Labour in the UK, he punted and left Obama holding the ball. Obama, for his part, then turned the matter over to Congress and forced the Republican (who must oppose everything Obama does) to vote against war. It was brilliant! Putin had nothing to do with it, imo.
The administration has requested fast-track authority for the TPP, but that does not mean that Obama supports it. He's wily, and he holds his cards close to his chest. The United States has been dragging its feet on the TPP, and I take that as a good sign.
That said, I have no idea what the President's true feelings are on the TPP. Nor does anyone else ecxept, perhaps, the First Lady.
-Laelth
That's the problem. This President holds his cards very close to his chest. That's irritating to those of us who want transparency and open discussion, but that's just what he does.
Why he does that is a topic I tackled in post #49, above.
-Laelth
I just hope I am right about this.
-Laelth
It's just about impossible to know where he stands on a whole host of issues. That, of course, is very frustrating to those of us who pay attention and want to know what's going on.
That said, your list of things that President Obama has not done is quite impressive and worthy of commendation.
-Laelth
best reply in the thread. 
Sid
I see your DU name was well chosen.
there is no defending it or anyone who claims that it is beneficial to anyone other than the corporate overlords.
Wouldn't have a clue where to start defending something so horrendous.
