Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:00 PM Mar 2012

I think we progressives should buy some ad time on Rush Limbaugh and here's why

First - we'd probably get the airtime cheap.

Second - half the listeners to Rush Limbaugh are progressives monitoring what he says - so we've got a great target audience.

Third - it would drive away what few right-wing nut jobs that still listen to his show. Could you imagine if Planned Parenthood or the NCAAP was running ads during the Rush Limbaugh show? HAHAHAHA

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think we progressives should buy some ad time on Rush Limbaugh and here's why (Original Post) LynneSin Mar 2012 OP
Ashley Madison offered to buy his ad space, and he turned them down LaydeeBug Mar 2012 #1
Don't agree. Still ProSense Mar 2012 #2
well the fact that we know everything that is happening with that show and all the sponsers LynneSin Mar 2012 #5
Most ProSense Mar 2012 #8
Please remember this is an opinion piece that is meant to have some humor to it LynneSin Mar 2012 #10
I sense the anger rising in this country 2pooped2pop Mar 2012 #12
As long as one of the ads we place is a 30 second cowbell solo, I'm all for it. iscooterliberally Mar 2012 #3
Pssst.. Colbert SuperPAC. tridim Mar 2012 #4
OMFG - GENIUS I do say just pure GENIUS LynneSin Mar 2012 #6
It's not a bad idea gratuitous Mar 2012 #7
True but it will only be a 'money losing' proposition if the stations lose local advertisers LynneSin Mar 2012 #9
Imagine Rush crowing about anyone wanting to advertise on his show...now.. nenagh Mar 2012 #13
yuck proudlibgal24 Mar 2012 #11
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
1. Ashley Madison offered to buy his ad space, and he turned them down
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:03 PM
Mar 2012

I can't imagine he wouldn't do the same...

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
2. Don't agree. Still
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:03 PM
Mar 2012

"Second - half the listeners to Rush Limbaugh are progressives monitoring what he says - so we've got a great target

...where is this statistic coming from?

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
5. well the fact that we know everything that is happening with that show and all the sponsers
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:06 PM
Mar 2012

There are alot of progressives listening to the show. Personally, I think you remove the progressive listeners you'll see his audience shrink immensely! But that's just my 2 cents!

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
8. Most
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:11 PM
Mar 2012

...people are hearing this via video clips and reports by organizations like Media Matters and Think Progress.

I have never once listened to Limbaugh's program. I doubt he has a significant progressive following. In fact, I doubt his audience is a big as claimed. He is being propped up by the Republican establishment.



 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
12. I sense the anger rising in this country
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:31 PM
Mar 2012

everywhere I go. People aren't happy anymore. It is even spilling into DU. People are being angry and crappy it seems to me. Much more than before. Don't cha think?
(I have no stats on this)

I know it is in me, too.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
6. OMFG - GENIUS I do say just pure GENIUS
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:06 PM
Mar 2012

Colbert would have a field day putting ads on the Limbaugh show!

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. It's not a bad idea
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:06 PM
Mar 2012

But I prefer to let the Free Market deal with this. If carrying that vile human being's radio program remains a money-losing proposition, stations will cast about for other programming that will make money for them. If we buy up ad time on that vile human being's program, that might allow him to remain on our public airwaves, even if our ads directly contradict what that vile human being just said.

That vile human being is perfectly entitled to hold whatever opinions he wants to hold, and express them out loud to anyone within earshot. I'm just interested in reducing earshot range from the whole country and AFN to whatever wing of his mansion that vile human being is in at any time.

Perhaps then, popular media figures who consider themselves to be decent people would at long last disassociate themselves from this vile human being.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
9. True but it will only be a 'money losing' proposition if the stations lose local advertisers
Fri Mar 9, 2012, 05:12 PM
Mar 2012

The reason these stations carry shows like Rush Limbaugh is that they practically give these shows away to the stations. The owner of the show (in this case Clear Channel) pays the host thru national advertising, much of which is done by package deals to the advertisers (which is why some advertisers had no clue their ads ended up on the Rush show). The local stations make their money thru the local advertisers and sponsers since each station is allocated so many minutes per hour for local ads along with weather/news/traffic.

Since we know that Clear Channel is owned by people who lean hard to the right they could probably carry Rush Limbaugh even if they have very few people who want to advertise on his show. Those 70+ advertisers who asked to not have their ads air during Rush's show - they are just having their ads relocated to another less offensive Clear Channel program. So Clear Channel is not being hurt by this boycott.

But if local stations can get anyone to buy their allotted time during the show they they may reason that they are not making money during the show and drop Rush - which is what we want!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think we progressives s...