Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,098 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 03:03 PM Nov 2013

Hard ball politics on the filibuster.

As most know, the filibuster reform by Harry Reid and the Democrats only applied to lower judgeships and executive appointments. And it did not include Supreme Court appointments or legislation.

The Republicans have vowed to fix that when they win back the Senate and the White House. So, why wait?

Make them take a stand now.

It is doubtful that Democrats would even vote to take the filibuster all the way. But the Republicans do not know that.

The Democrats should mess with their minds. Threaten to bring up for a vote to do away with the filibuster on Supreme Court nominees and also controversial legislation. How would the Republicans react??

Since we are almost certain they would pass it if they become the majority, what would be their position while they are still the minority? Would they vehemently oppose it? My bet is that they would stroke out.

But it is not going to pass with Democrats.

However, sometimes politics is like poker. Your opponent does not know what cards you are holding and sometimes you can buy a pot.

The point of the exercise would be to get Republicans on the record. A video record of their opposition whenever they decide to change the entire filibuster rule.

Another point of the exercise would be to put the Republicans on the defensive. Let them know that two can play this game.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hard ball politics on the filibuster. (Original Post) kentuck Nov 2013 OP
While we're at it, why not have Obama add two Supreme Court judges rock Nov 2013 #1
I think FDR tried that? kentuck Nov 2013 #2
Well, it would still be fun even if it didn't work rock Nov 2013 #3
I think it might put the Repubs on the defensive? kentuck Nov 2013 #4

rock

(13,218 posts)
1. While we're at it, why not have Obama add two Supreme Court judges
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:38 PM
Nov 2013

Bringing it up to 11. As I understand it the number of judges on SCOTUS doesn't have hard rules about how many there are.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hard ball politics on the...