Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Threedifferentones

(1,070 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:33 PM Nov 2013

Does not believing the official story constitute a Conspiracy Theory?

Look, I do not know who was really behind JFK's assassination, nor do I claim to have any special insight that has not long been available to the general public. But does that mean I have to accept that the findings of the Warren Commission make good sense?

This healthy suspicion is hardly unique to me. In fact, rather than go over all the things that seem wrong with the official story, I'm just going to link ya'll to this npr story. There's a good bit of evidence to back up its headline that "inconsistencies haunt the official record of Kennedy's death." I will never believe that the Warren Commission had access to the whole story, nor do I expect any of us to ever learn the truth, but that is a far cry from being some loon in a tinfoil hat.

http://www.npr.org/2013/11/10/243981006/inconsistencies-haunt-official-record-of-kennedys-death

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does not believing the official story constitute a Conspiracy Theory? (Original Post) Threedifferentones Nov 2013 OP
Nope. Iggo Nov 2013 #1
When in the last 250 years has this government been forthcoming about what it is doing in our name? RC Nov 2013 #2
Indeed RC the blind acceptance of our fellow citizens can be astounding. Threedifferentones Nov 2013 #5
I still remember Mrs. Kennedy's stark statement..."They've killed my husband."..n/t monmouth3 Nov 2013 #3
Only from the perspective that... JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #4
Not for me... Wounded Bear Nov 2013 #6
 

RC

(25,592 posts)
2. When in the last 250 years has this government been forthcoming about what it is doing in our name?
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:39 PM
Nov 2013

This country was founded on slavery and genocide. If we are not killing our own here, we are exporting our death industries to other countries.

Threedifferentones

(1,070 posts)
5. Indeed RC the blind acceptance of our fellow citizens can be astounding.
Reply to RC (Reply #2)
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:44 PM
Nov 2013

People frequently ask for rigorous proof when someone dares question an official story.

But, an honest appraisal of our history shows that it is more reasonable to assume that the official version is covering up evil, oppressive tactics, and that a really good question is:

Why on Earth should we believe the official story?

JimboBillyBubbaBob

(1,389 posts)
4. Only from the perspective that...
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:42 PM
Nov 2013

...holders of such beliefs are counted empirically as a cohort member in whatever question is being supported or not supported relative to the questioning undertaken.

Wounded Bear

(58,660 posts)
6. Not for me...
Sat Nov 23, 2013, 04:46 PM
Nov 2013

There are enough inconsistencies in the 'official' story that CTs are inevitable.

I'm not so sure that the Warren Commission didn't have access to the whole story, but it is obvious that they published the sanitized version deemed to be acceptable for release and buried many details. I'm not a CTist myself, but I know that we haven't been told the whole story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does not believing the of...