Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,106 posts)
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 03:40 PM Dec 2013

Democrats never learn.

They have to stop acting like Republicans. This is fucking war. We have always been at war. The "haves" have always wanted more and the "have nots" have had to fight for every inch of progress ever made in the history of humankind.

As Democrats learned during the Great Depression, those at the top will end up with everything and those at the bottom will not have a pot to piss in. A Democratic Party that does not understand this is not worth having, let alone supporting.

There is no compromise. You have to fight for a fair share of the wealth. They will not agree to a minimum wage, let alone an increase in the minimum wage. They will not agree to unemployment benefits for those without a job. They will no longer agree to give food stamps to hungry children. If this is not war, then what is it?

Giving voters a choice between the Republican Party and those that act like Republicans is a sure loser. To put your faith in the marketplace is putting the noose around all our necks. The marketplace will screw the people every time.

Either we hang together or surely we will all hang separately.

I could say more, but you get my drift.

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrats never learn. (Original Post) kentuck Dec 2013 OP
Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us twice, shame on us. blkmusclmachine Dec 2013 #1
doncha get fooled again, heh, heh NoOneMan Dec 2013 #27
Well expressed . I can't think of a single politician, on either side, russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #2
I Can Leith Dec 2013 #9
I think Russ Feingold was. Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #12
That is much too broad a brush. bvar22 Dec 2013 #22
Thanks for posting this. russspeakeasy Dec 2013 #23
Sadly, I've been been saying the same thing since Reagan and with rare exception, it just continues. abq e streeter Dec 2013 #3
What makes you think they haven't learned? bvar22 Dec 2013 #4
But have the Democratic voters learned? kentuck Dec 2013 #5
Yay, Hilary Kurovski Dec 2013 #7
What Democrats have learned is that they CAN vote for the same crap, Maedhros Dec 2013 #14
Thank you. nt woo me with science Dec 2013 #24
+1 1000words Dec 2013 #18
I lost track hfojvt Dec 2013 #6
All we have to do is elect progressives!!! bvar22 Dec 2013 #8
But he sure talks purty... malthaussen Dec 2013 #10
To paraphrase some Rush lyrics: Maedhros Dec 2013 #16
+1 daleanime Dec 2013 #13
Ouch. MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #29
Interesting revision of history... JackRiddler Dec 2013 #25
I DO get your drift... ReRe Dec 2013 #11
In the latest polls... politichew Dec 2013 #15
He's not liberal enough FOR ME. Maedhros Dec 2013 #17
I will. As long as the opponent is Ineeda Dec 2013 #19
I think the more important fact is that Congress has about a 9% approval rating. liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #26
First question I would ask about that poll truebluegreen Dec 2013 #31
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Dec 2013 #20
IMHE there is a big difference between Democrats and Democratic Party Leadership. nt TeamPooka Dec 2013 #21
I spend hours a day thinking about this. Notafraidtoo Dec 2013 #28
You're assuming that they have good intentions MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #30
Yep - it is start to sound like 1999 all over again. tjwash Dec 2013 #32

russspeakeasy

(6,539 posts)
2. Well expressed . I can't think of a single politician, on either side,
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 03:47 PM
Dec 2013

that is willing to put the public interest ahead of their own self interest. Not One !

Leith

(7,813 posts)
9. I Can
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 05:14 PM
Dec 2013

Representative Dina Titus voted for the ACA and lost the next election.

Senator Elizabeth Warren seems to be pretty good.

There may be others that I can't think of right now.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
12. I think Russ Feingold was.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 05:34 PM
Dec 2013

He always voted his conscience, and did not profit unduly from his years in DC. He also didn't become a lobbyist or otherwise hawk his Congressional connections.

Tammy Baldwin MAY turn out really good. She hasn't really had time to be tested yet.

Warren of course. Bernie Sanders.

NO Republicans. Not a single one.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
22. That is much too broad a brush.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 07:10 PM
Dec 2013

You can find GOOD Democrats worthy of your support in the Progressive Caucus.
Unfortunately, they have been completely marginalized by the Party Leadership.
Few DARE to oppose the President on anything in fear of the consequences.

It DOES take some political courage to OPPOSE the White House,
but you CAN find some good Democrats who know WHY they are Democrats.

Here is a place for you to start looking.
The names in BOLD are worthy of your support,
and worthy of the "D" behind their names.

Progressive Caucus Folds

More than 10 days ago, Congressmen Alan Grayson and Mark Takano initiated the forthright letter, circulating it among House colleagues. Addressed to President Obama, the letter has enabled members of Congress to take a historic stand: joining together in a public pledge not to vote for any cuts in Social Security, Medicare or Medicaid.


The Progressive Caucus co-chairs, Raul Grijalva and Keith Ellison, signed the letter. So did Barbara Lee, the caucus whip. But no signer can be found among the five vice chairs of the Progressive Caucus: Judy Chu, David Cicilline, Michael Honda, Sheila Jackson-Lee and Jan Schakowsky. The letter’s current list of signers includes just 16 members of the Progressive Caucus (along with five other House signers who aren’t part of the caucus).

What about the other 54 members of the Progressive Caucus? Their absence from the letter is a clear message to the Obama White House, which has repeatedly declared its desire to cut the Social Security cost of living adjustment as well as Medicare. In effect, those 54 non-signers are signaling: Mr. President, we call ourselves “progressive” but we are unwilling to stick our necks out by challenging you in defense of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid; we want some wiggle room that you can exploit.

In contrast, the House members on the short list of the letter’s signers deserve our praise for taking a clear stand: Brown, Cartwright, Conyers, DeFazio, Ellison, Faleomavaega, Grayson, G. Green, Grijalva, Gutierrez, A. Hastings, Kaptur, Lee, McGovern, Nadler, Napolitano, Nolan, Serrano, Takano, Velazquez and Waters.


Like I said above, the Democrats in BOLD have EARNED your support.
It is heart breaking (and disgusting) that there are only a handful remaining in what was once the Party of the Working Class that gave us the New Deal and Great Society.

abq e streeter

(7,658 posts)
3. Sadly, I've been been saying the same thing since Reagan and with rare exception, it just continues.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 03:48 PM
Dec 2013

BUT...Maybe, just maybe,NEXT time, if we're REALLY REALLY super duper nice to them, they'll be nice to us.
Signed, formerly proud member of the Charlie Brown and the football party.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
4. What makes you think they haven't learned?
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 03:53 PM
Dec 2013

Nothing happens in Washington by accident.

You are way more forgiving and optimistic than I am.
I think the Democrats have "learned",
and "learned well" since the Reagan Revolution.
They have learned WHO puts the most butter on their bread,
and it ain't the American Working Class.


[font color=firebrick][center]"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want a party that will STAND UP for Working Americans."
---Paul Wellstone [/font]
[/center]
[center][/font]
[font size=1]photo by bvar22
Shortly before Sen Wellstone was killed[/center]
[/font]


You will know them by their WORKS.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
14. What Democrats have learned is that they CAN vote for the same crap,
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 05:57 PM
Dec 2013

over and over, and the rank-and-file will continue to give them votes. There is no down side to sucking up to Wall Street and Big Oil. They get paid off by the corporate lobbyists and vote against our interests. Then, when recalcitrant progressives demand accountability, the enforcers of partisan loyalty line up to ridicule and denigrate them. Look, there's probably one responding to this post right now! And, by and large, it works.

Until Democratic leaders learn that supporting pro-corporate policies and tearing down the New Deal gets them thrown out of office they will continue to support pro-corporate policies and tear down the New Deal. They will do this regardless of how many times we politely ask them not to while pledging to vote for them anyway.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
6. I lost track
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 04:05 PM
Dec 2013

have we always been at war with Eurasia, or have we always been at war with Oceania?

Democrats are not gonna stop acting like Republicans until the voters make them.

How can the voters make them?

Step 1 - stop electing Republicans (this first step is pretty key)
Step 2 - stop electing conservadems and DINOs in primaries (also pretty key)

I mean, look at 2010. Democrats won the House in 2006 and then won the Senate and Presidency in 2008. They raised the minimum wage, they boosted food stamps, they extended unemployment, they saved the economy and bailed out General Motors. They created a national healthy care system.

And how did a majority of voters react?

Democrats got their a$$es handed to them in 2010.

From that point, Democrats HAD to compromise, because Republicans had leverage.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
8. All we have to do is elect progressives!!!
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 04:41 PM
Dec 2013

Speaking of 2010:
The Arkansas Democratic Primary was a heart breaking eye opener for the Grass Roots and Organized LABOR. We were given a Look Behind the Curtain,
and it wasn't very pretty.

[font size=3]We did EVERYTHING right in Arkansas in 2010.
We did EXACTLY what the White House asked us to do to "give the President Progressives in Congress that would work with him."[/font]

We organized and supported Lt Governor Bill Halter, the Pro-LABOR/ Pro-Health Care challenger to DINO Obstructionist Blanche Lincoln.
Halter was:

* Polling BETTER against the Republicans in the General,

*was popular in Arkansas in his OWN right,

*had an Up & Running Political machine,

* had a track record of winning elections (Lt. Governor)

*Had the full backing of Organized LABOR and The Grass Roots activists

*was handing Blanche her Anti-LABOR ass in The Primary until the White House stepped in

*Blanche had NO chance of winning the General in Arkansas

Guess what happened.
Our BIGGEST enemy to bring "change" to The Senate was NOT The "Obstructionist" Republicans.
NO!
Our BIGGEST enemy to bring "change" to The Senate was The Obama White House!

The White House stepped in at the last minute to save Blanche's failing primary campaign with an Oval Office Endorsement of The Witch that Wrecked the Obama Agenda,
and Bill Clinton was dispatched on a Campaign Tour for Blanche around the state bashing Organized LABOR and "Liberals" at every opportunity.

White House steps in to rescue Lincoln’s Primary Campaign in Arkansas

"So what did the Democratic Party establishment do when a Senator who allegedly impedes their agenda faced a primary challenger who would be more supportive of that agenda? They engaged in full-scale efforts to support Blanche Lincoln.

* Bill Clinton traveled to Arkansas to urge loyal Democrats to vote for her, bashing liberal groups for good measure.

*Obama recorded an ad for Lincoln which, among other things, were used to tell African-American primary voters that they should vote for her because she works for their interests.

*The entire Party infrastructure lent its support and resources to Lincoln — a Senator who supposedly prevents Democrats from doing all sorts of Wonderful, Progressive Things which they so wish they could do but just don’t have the votes for.

<snip>

What happened in this race also gives the lie to the insufferable excuse we’ve been hearing for the last 18 months from countless Obama defenders: namely, if the Senate doesn’t have 60 votes to pass good legislation, it’s not Obama’s fault because he has no leverage over these conservative Senators. It was always obvious what an absurd joke that claim was; the very idea of The Impotent, Helpless President, presiding over a vast government and party apparatus, was laughable. But now, in light of Arkansas, nobody should ever be willing to utter that again with a straight face.

Back when Lincoln was threatening to filibuster health care if it included a public option, the White House could obviously have said to her: if you don’t support a public option, not only will we not support your re-election bid, but we’ll support a primary challenger against you. Obama’s support for Lincoln did not merely help; it was arguably decisive, as The Washington Post documented today:"

<much more>

http://www.salon.com/2010/06/10/lincoln_6/


When the supporters of Pro-LABOR Lt Gov Bill Halter asked the White House WHY they threw their support behind Lincoln at the last minute, rescuing her failing campaign, the answer was ridicule and insults to Organized LABOR and the Grass Roots.

Ed Schultz sums up my feeling perfectly in the following clip.
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/ed-schultz-if-it-wasnt-labor-barack-obama-
After the Arkansas Democratic Primary, many Grass Roots Activists working for a better government concluded that the current Democratic Party Leadership preferred to give this Senate Seat to a Big Business Republican
than to let an actual Pro-LABOR Democrat have a chance to win it.
This was greatly reinforced by the Insults & Ridicule to LABOR from the White House after the Primary "victory" over Organized LABOR & the Grass Roots in the Arkansas Democratic Primary.

Of course, as predicted by EVERYBODY, Lincoln lost badly in the General Election, giving that Senate Seat to The Republicans.
So what did the White House gain by Stomping Down Labor and the Grass Roots?
We don't know. The White House has never responded to our questions with an explanation, only insults and ridicule.


Union Thugs take an ass whipping from time to time,
[font size=3]but we NEVER forget a Sucker Punch & WHO Threw it.[/font]





You will know them by their WORKS.

malthaussen

(17,209 posts)
10. But he sure talks purty...
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 05:20 PM
Dec 2013

Every time the man makes a speech, half of DU falls into a swoon.

-- Mal

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
16. To paraphrase some Rush lyrics:
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 06:03 PM
Dec 2013

"Political machinery moves to His command
Oh, Barack Obama, magnificent and so grand!
Moved to worship, we bow and close our eyes,
Oh, Barack Obama, promise every prize!"

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
25. Interesting revision of history...
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 12:25 AM
Dec 2013

"I mean, look at 2010. Democrats won the House in 2006 and then won the Senate and Presidency in 2008. They raised the minimum wage, they boosted food stamps, they extended unemployment, they saved the economy and bailed out General Motors. They created a national healthy care system."

There is no national healthy care system. It's a bailout for

General Motors was bailed out - so? The government owned it, they could have switched to electric car and wind turbine production. They could have easily expanded these sectors with investment. Instead, they stuck with petrol cars and sold it back into the private sector.

That bailout was a small part of bailing out the banking establishment who created most of the problems in the first place.

Saved the economy? What a joke.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
11. I DO get your drift...
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 05:29 PM
Dec 2013

Just because someone has a "D" after their name does not make one a Democrat. REAL Democrats need to step up to the plate iin their states and run for office like it's the Hunger Games to deny the DINOs a seat in Congress!

 

politichew

(230 posts)
15. In the latest polls...
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 06:01 PM
Dec 2013

Only 12% of the electorate thinks President Obama is not liberal enough.

Just because they're vocal doesn't make their political analysis worth a damn.

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
17. He's not liberal enough FOR ME.
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 06:07 PM
Dec 2013

Hell, he's not even MODERATE enough for me. He is also way too much of a warmonger for me.

So I guess I don't care what the polls say? I won't ever vote for a Democrat who behaves like Obama has.

Ineeda

(3,626 posts)
19. I will. As long as the opponent is
Fri Dec 20, 2013, 06:17 PM
Dec 2013

the likes of McCain/Palin or Romney/Ryan, I'd vote for a "Democrat who behaves like Obama" every day of the week.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
26. I think the more important fact is that Congress has about a 9% approval rating.
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 12:25 AM
Dec 2013

Both republicans and democrats make promises to the people. When people see their wages stagnate for decades, unions busted, and retirement benefits cut year after year after year they know better than to trust either party. There are plenty of people who think our entire government is not liberal enough.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
31. First question I would ask about that poll
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 03:27 PM
Dec 2013

is does it use the demonized word "liberal"? If so the results will be skewed.

Notafraidtoo

(402 posts)
28. I spend hours a day thinking about this.
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 12:39 AM
Dec 2013

I agree with you 100%, Human nature through out history has been like this, those disconnected from common people who are powerful just never stop taking from others, someone always has to stop them in the end, it amazes me we repeat this endless cycle when it seems to always play out the same way over and over.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
30. You're assuming that they have good intentions
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 01:13 AM
Dec 2013

I can't see how good intentions can be ascribed to anyone involved in creating or abetting the Simpson Bowles commission, or otherwise calling for the social safety net to be cut when we need it most.

It's not sensible or necessary - it's just sick. These are not good people.

tjwash

(8,219 posts)
32. Yep - it is start to sound like 1999 all over again.
Sat Dec 21, 2013, 04:18 PM
Dec 2013

Same old tired "my exact agenda wasn't implemented therefore we will vote for ((insert third party hack that has zero electability here))" and voila - 8 years of Bush.

President Ryan thanks you.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats never learn.