U.S. Government Buys Uniforms from Foreign Companies that Exploit Workers

[The Straight Story]

The Obama administration has urged Western companies to fight for better working conditions for overseas workers in sweatshops. But at the same time, federal agencies have continued to purchase uniforms made in other countries where employees are repeatedly exploited, if not abused.

The U.S. government purchases about $1.5 billion a year in clothing from foreign factories for operations ranging from the Forest Service to the U.S. military.

This practice has not let up, even though the Obama administration has decried the exploitation of foreign workers.

Ian Urbina at The New York Times reported: “American government suppliers in countries including Bangladesh, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Mexico, Pakistan and Vietnam show a pattern of legal violations and harsh working conditions, according to audits and interviews at factories. Among them: padlocked fire exits, buildings at risk of collapse, falsified wage records and repeated hand punctures from sewing needles when workers were pushed to hurry up.”

The bad examples involving the federal government include:

DK Knitwear in Bangladesh, which makes Marine Corps shirts for sale at military stores. The sweatshop’s workforce is 30% children. Workers have been beaten for missing production quotas, and forced to work in a location with no fire alarm system, despite previous outbreaks of fire.

http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/us-government-buys-uniforms-from-foreign-companies-that-exploit-workers-131226?news=852008

[Glassunion]

1. You're missing the point

The uniforms are cheap. Do you know how much money the govt saves by purchasing from foreign companies?

Children are small, easy to manipulate and don't require as much food as adults. This makes them cheaper and easier to control. This relates to savings. A penny saved, is a penny earned.

You cannot expect the government to spend our tax dollars on expensive American clothing.

[xchrom]

2. du rec.