Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 11:07 PM Jan 2014

Wall Street’s Frightening New Plan To Become America’s Landlord

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/01/24/3203471/wall-street-landlord/



Anyone who has ever struggled to get her landlord to fix a broken appliance can imagine how much worse it could have been if she were paying rent to a faceless hedge fund based thousands of miles away. That tenant’s nightmare may be on its way to reality for hundreds of thousands of Americans, as Wall Street firms have snapped up 200,000 family houses with the intention of renting them out.
Banks, hedge funds, and private equity firms have been amassing those real estate holdings for a few years now, but their plan for wringing profit out of the rental market is just starting to draw real scrutiny. The New York-based hedge fund Blackstone Group is now the nation’s largest landlord after purchasing over 40,000 foreclosed family homes for the purpose of renting them out.

While firms like Blackstone often farm out the day-to-day management of the rental properties to third-party companies, those intermediaries are often also based in faraway states. Some have a track record of being unresponsive to basic things like broken sewer pipes, as the Huffington Post has reported. The banks and their intermediaries may neglect basic upkeep of these properties. In that worst-case scenario for renters, local and attentive property managers and building supers will get replaced with “Wall Street-based absentee slumlords,” in David Dayen’s phrase.

<snip>

But firms like Blackstone aren’t just renting the homes, of course. The real money for the firm is in turning the rent payments it will receive from those 40,000 units into financial products called securities that it can sell to other investors. The practice could prove to be a broadly beneficial way to allocate scarce housing resources — or it could mirror the casino culture that turned the subprime bubble into an economy-wrecking conflagration.

<snip>



"History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."

Karl Marx


18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wall Street’s Frightening New Plan To Become America’s Landlord (Original Post) Starry Messenger Jan 2014 OP
How to destroy communities... hunter Jan 2014 #1
Sure, what could go wrong? Rent-backed securities should be a safe bet, right? Spider Jerusalem Jan 2014 #2
Right? Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #3
Kick for the weekend crowd Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #4
It's temporary - they will sell them when the prices go up. FarCenter Jan 2014 #5
Nope - more money in renting . . . ConcernedCanuk Jan 2014 #6
Slumlords are usually smaller proprieters -- too much adverse publicity for big banks FarCenter Jan 2014 #13
I live in CA. This practice is driving up home prices. Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #7
The old "pump and dump" FarCenter Jan 2014 #12
Here we go again. TransitJohn Jan 2014 #8
Instead of rewarding them when they crash the economy with their stupid recklessness. Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #9
Bump..nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2014 #10
Thanks. I thought this was a pretty big deal. Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #11
It's kind of like recycling - TBF Jan 2014 #14
Capitalism is a one-trick pony. Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #15
Sounds to me like they're volunteering to be Section 8 Housing. Shandris Jan 2014 #16
How are these greedy hedge fund managers not in prison yet? Initech Jan 2014 #17
Because they are too big to fail? Starry Messenger Jan 2014 #18

hunter

(38,328 posts)
1. How to destroy communities...
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 01:54 AM
Jan 2014

... first buy all the property, then suck out all the money.

It's not sustainable, and really ought to be illegal.

 

Spider Jerusalem

(21,786 posts)
2. Sure, what could go wrong? Rent-backed securities should be a safe bet, right?
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:10 AM
Jan 2014

After all, it worked so well with mortgages...oh, wait.

 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
6. Nope - more money in renting . . .
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 11:57 AM
Jan 2014

.
.
.

Real Estate value always goes up - the land is usually worth more than the buildings on it nowadays,

ergo - no big financial incentive to upkeep the buildings.

Rape the tenants and carry on.

Ain't capitalism great?

CC

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
13. Slumlords are usually smaller proprieters -- too much adverse publicity for big banks
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:28 PM
Jan 2014

E.g. an apartment complex in Detroit was owned by a small LLC of real estate investors from NY. It was going down hill. They went bankrupt.

Now the lenders have brought in a professional real estate management company and the complex is coming back.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
7. I live in CA. This practice is driving up home prices.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 12:02 PM
Jan 2014

Investors can make high cash bids that single family buyers can't match.

TransitJohn

(6,932 posts)
8. Here we go again.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 12:05 PM
Jan 2014

it sure would be nice if we had some sort of government regulatory agency that would keep these scum from going after the cheap, easy, dirty money.

TBF

(32,098 posts)
14. It's kind of like recycling -
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:32 PM
Jan 2014

they did this with mortgages the first time around - now they'll do it with rentals. They're resourceful.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
15. Capitalism is a one-trick pony.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:36 PM
Jan 2014

Get one idea and wring it out until it is dead. The only thing innovative is that they find new ways to make this bullshit smell like roses every 5 years.

 

Shandris

(3,447 posts)
16. Sounds to me like they're volunteering to be Section 8 Housing.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 02:39 PM
Jan 2014

Somehow I don't think that they'll like that idea, but it would be a nice method to keep them honest, as it were. After all, they're a lot closer to Washington than they are to central Indiana (for instance).

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
18. Because they are too big to fail?
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 08:07 PM
Jan 2014

Personally, they seem more like the drunk dad who gambles away his whole paycheck and then passes out. But evidently they are our betters and are important and stuff.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wall Street’s Frightening...