Is Rand Paul suggesting that

[EC]

Monica didn't know what she was doing when she seduced the President? That is again saying women don't know what they are doing when it involves their sexuality.

[YarnAddict]

1. I don't think

she really considered--or even understood--all the potential consequences. Probably mostly because of her very young age at the time.

[EC]

2. Well, yeah, the political ramifications

but the sexual seduction she knew what she was doing.

[YarnAddict]

3. Of course,

but I also think that if she had considered what it would mean for both Clinton AND HERSELF, she would have decided it really wasn't worth it.

[kentuck]

4. Somehow, she found Lucianne Goldberg...

To talk about and give her advice and be sure to save the blue dress, "You got him, Darling..."

But Bill Clinton showed a moment of weakness and cannot escape responsibility for his actions. We all make mistakes. The "Big Dog" continued to have his supporters and was high in almost every poll.

[EC]

5. Yes, but what I'm pointing out

is that Rand is doing exactly the same as all the new republican abortion laws and things they say about women. They truly believe that women don't know what they are doing when it comes to sex. He is trying to turn it into Bill Clinton the big bad man prayed on her and molested her. He's being patronizing.

[okaawhatever]

6. What he was saying was....don't vote for Clinton in 2016. Vote for me instead. Since he doesn't have

Christie around to talk smack about he's moving on to his potential opponent from the Democratic party. He's trying to frame the narrative that Clinton is a predator and Monica was a victim. I'm sure there will be more comments along this same story line coming from the right wing soon. It's the Republican way of saying, "If there is a war on women in the GOP, Clinton is just as bad or worse. The Dems have a war on women, too."

He lacks understanding of both women and non-GOP intelligent males. He's going on the attack, but it may come back to bit him. We'll see.