Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 05:38 PM Feb 2014

Comcast's Time Warner Deal Is Bad for America

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-02-13/comcast-s-time-warner-deal-is-bad-for-america.html

David Cohen, Comcast Corp.'s executive vice president and the mastermind behind its deal to buy Time Warner Cable Inc., sounded pugnacious and confident on a recent conference call with investors. Regulatory and antitrust approval of the deal, he says, will happen within the next nine to 12 months. But even Cohen had to acknowledge that the public might be worried about the power of this combination. "It may sound scary," he said.

Indeed it does. Although Comcast's management points out that when they're finished -- and after they divest some of their systems to others -- the combined company will have just 30 percent of the national share of pay-television subscribers. Nationwide share means little to people and businesses, which often have little choice when it comes to cable: Ninety-one percent of Americans who subscribe to data services also buy video services, so the relevant market for them is the bundle. When it comes to bundles, satellite companies Dish Network Corp. and DIRECTV can't offer the data capacity that Comcast can; their communications have to travel more than 22,000 miles one way.

The reason this deal is scary is that for the vast majority of businesses in 19 of the 20 largest metropolitan areas in the country, their only choice for a high-capacity wired connection will be Comcast. Comcast, in turn, has its own built-in conflicts of interest: It will be serving the interests of its shareholders by keeping investments in its network as low as possible -- in particular, making no move to provide the world-class fiber-optic connections that are now standard and cheap in other countries -- and extracting as much rent as it can, in all kinds of ways. Comcast, for purposes of today's public , is calling itself a "cable company." It no longer is. Comcast sells infrastructure subject to neither competition nor a cop on the beat.

For a country attempting to compete on the global stage, this is a problem. It's time to recognize that industrial policy -- true leadership, the kinds of initiatives that brought us the federal highway system and national electrification -- is called for. If regulating these guys is too difficult, let's allow mayors to build alternative fiber-optic networks such as the one in Chattanooga, Tennessee, that has lured businesses and spurred economic growth. We can't allow our future to be captured by the short-term cash flow desires of Comcast's investors.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Comcast's Time Warner Deal Is Bad for America (Original Post) cal04 Feb 2014 OP
And failing to enforce the antitrust laws is dereliction of duty. Faryn Balyncd Feb 2014 #1
Amen to that Armstead Feb 2014 #4
I'm hoping since they squashed the ATT/T-Mobile deal, they'll kill this one as well kysrsoze Feb 2014 #2
Hear, hear! k&r n/t Laelth Feb 2014 #3

kysrsoze

(6,022 posts)
2. I'm hoping since they squashed the ATT/T-Mobile deal, they'll kill this one as well
Thu Feb 13, 2014, 06:09 PM
Feb 2014

That one was such a joke. Look now - prices FINALLY are starting to drop on mobile comm, but you know that wouldn't have happened had that merger gone through. I'm staying positive over this one as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Comcast's Time Warner Dea...