General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJuror 6: Race had nothing to do with verdict. POOR CHILD
She's wrong just because no one brought it up in the deliberation doesn't mean it wasn't a factor.The fact that Dunn approached those black kids was racist in it self.If they were four white boys listening to Led Zeppelin turned up loud does anyone think he would of told them to turn the music down. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/michael-dunn-juror-race-was-never-a-factor-in-the-verdict/
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)They are not the same.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)badtoworse
(5,957 posts)bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)You should start listening to African American radio to see what we are talking about.
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)pipi_k
(21,020 posts)so what?
Just because they might be white, that means their verdicts were based on race?
You know, there are some really scary opinions here at DU regarding what a juror's job is, and how s/he is supposed to do it.
Diamonique
(1,655 posts)The only self defense testimony came from the defendant. There was nothing and no one who corroborated his testimony. Plus, the prosecution proved that it was all lies anyway. So how could anyone truly believe it was self defense?
Hmmmm.....
AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)the prosecution proved it was all lies. Jesus Fucking Christ on a Cracker, the jury was not convinced, that does not make them racist or their failure to convict on 1st degree murder a racist decision. How on earth does anyone reach that conclusion? Hopefully a retrial will convict Dunn, BUT if it doesn't again I won't blame the second jury of racism either.
Dunn shoots Jordan Davis
Dunn claims to it was self defense
Prosecution tries to prove it was not self defense
Jury cannot reach conviction on 1st degree murder
Those are the 4 facts of the case, only the first one smacks of racism. Engage those critical thinking skills.....
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... factor.
There was NOTHING to get hung on... the 3 people who live just lied!?!?!?
The cameras too?!
Come on
AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)Miles, 21, said she believes Dunn is guilty of murder, but not as charged. She thinks he was guilty of second-degree murder.
"I think he is a good guy. I don't think he hates everybody. I don't think he walks around wanting to shoot everybody. I think that he made bad decisions," she said.
springchick
(137 posts)she's convinced he's guilty of murder, just not murder 1.
cheyanne
(733 posts)To be evidence in a trial, "knowledge" must be clear and evident.
Since Dunn didn't say anything racist, the law cannot accept our "knowledge" that his motivation was racist. The prosecution cannot say "he is white, they are black, therefore it's racist."
Remember that there was a MISTRIAL on the murder charge: murder 1, murder 2, or manslaughter
Each charge has very specific rules for applying it to a case.
It hurts our judicial system to ask, expect it to do what it is not able to do.
AnalystInParadise
(1,832 posts)well said
cheyanne
(733 posts)our legal system for awhile: that somehow the court should accept assumptions about motives or events that have no basis in actual evidence that pertains to a specific charge.
Let me know of any other examples of you know about.
Right now I'm working on explaining how Nugent was able to not apologize, and yet make people think he did.