Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:42 AM Feb 2014

Juror 6: Race had nothing to do with verdict. POOR CHILD

She's wrong just because no one brought it up in the deliberation doesn't mean it wasn't a factor.The fact that Dunn approached those black kids was racist in it self.If they were four white boys listening to Led Zeppelin turned up loud does anyone think he would of told them to turn the music down. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/michael-dunn-juror-race-was-never-a-factor-in-the-verdict/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)
1. It might have been a factor in the killing. The juror was speaking about the verdict
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 10:46 AM
Feb 2014

They are not the same.

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
7. Hate tell you but most African Americans would agree with me
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:24 PM
Feb 2014

You should start listening to African American radio to see what we are talking about.

pipi_k

(21,020 posts)
4. And if they are...
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 11:22 AM
Feb 2014

so what?

Just because they might be white, that means their verdicts were based on race?


You know, there are some really scary opinions here at DU regarding what a juror's job is, and how s/he is supposed to do it.



Diamonique

(1,655 posts)
5. There was nothing for them to base a NG verdict on.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 11:25 AM
Feb 2014

The only self defense testimony came from the defendant. There was nothing and no one who corroborated his testimony. Plus, the prosecution proved that it was all lies anyway. So how could anyone truly believe it was self defense?

Hmmmm.....

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
11. IN YOUR MIND
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 02:49 PM
Feb 2014

the prosecution proved it was all lies. Jesus Fucking Christ on a Cracker, the jury was not convinced, that does not make them racist or their failure to convict on 1st degree murder a racist decision. How on earth does anyone reach that conclusion? Hopefully a retrial will convict Dunn, BUT if it doesn't again I won't blame the second jury of racism either.

Dunn shoots Jordan Davis
Dunn claims to it was self defense
Prosecution tries to prove it was not self defense
Jury cannot reach conviction on 1st degree murder

Those are the 4 facts of the case, only the first one smacks of racism. Engage those critical thinking skills.....

uponit7771

(90,347 posts)
8. You're right, there are plenty of blacks who hate blacks too... (see Clarance Thomas) race STILL
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 01:41 PM
Feb 2014

... factor.

There was NOTHING to get hung on... the 3 people who live just lied!?!?!?

The cameras too?!

Come on


 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
10. She appears to be one of the holdouts.
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 02:45 PM
Feb 2014
http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/20/justice/florida-loud-music-case/

Miles, 21, said she believes Dunn is guilty of murder, but not as charged. She thinks he was guilty of second-degree murder.
"I think he is a good guy. I don't think he hates everybody. I don't think he walks around wanting to shoot everybody. I think that he made bad decisions," she said.

cheyanne

(733 posts)
6. There is a difference between "evidence" and "knowledge".
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 11:30 AM
Feb 2014

To be evidence in a trial, "knowledge" must be clear and evident.

Since Dunn didn't say anything racist, the law cannot accept our "knowledge" that his motivation was racist. The prosecution cannot say "he is white, they are black, therefore it's racist."

Remember that there was a MISTRIAL on the murder charge: murder 1, murder 2, or manslaughter

Each charge has very specific rules for applying it to a case.

It hurts our judicial system to ask, expect it to do what it is not able to do.

cheyanne

(733 posts)
14. Thanks for the comment. I've been pointing this common misapprehention about
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 05:36 PM
Feb 2014

our legal system for awhile: that somehow the court should accept assumptions about motives or events that have no basis in actual evidence that pertains to a specific charge.

Let me know of any other examples of you know about.

Right now I'm working on explaining how Nugent was able to not apologize, and yet make people think he did.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Juror 6: Race had nothing...