Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 07:19 PM Apr 2014

The Tax Breaks That Are Killing the Planet

ExxonMobil, the world’s largest oil company, hauled in a $32.6 billion profit last year. Chief executive Rex Tillerson got a 3 percent bump in his pay package, sending it above $28 million. And today, the company gets its annual boost from the federal government: an estimated $600 million in tax breaks.

All told, the government gifts as much as $4.8 billion to the oil industry each year, more than any other country. Much of that comes not as direct handouts but instead via loopholes in the tax code; deductions for depleting oil reserves, for example, and write-offs for the expense of drilling a new well. These reflect a long-past era in which oil exploration was financially risky, and prices were low. Now oil prices and profits are high, and the government is losing revenue while promoting the continued exploitation of carbon-intensive fuels. In the face of a changing climate and a constrained domestic budget, the lunacy of such preferential treatment is hard to overstate.

“Perverse” is the word the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found for such policies in its latest report, which was released in full on Tuesday. Globally, subsidies for fossil fuel production—amounting to $1.9 trillion in 2011, or 8 percent of government revenues, according to the International Monetary Fund —“prove to increase emissions and put heavy burdens on public budgets,” reads the report.

On the other hand, rolling them back could be a key part of a serious climate agenda. The IMF estimates that eliminating fossil fuel subsidies could lower emissions by 13 percent. That general principle, if not the exact figure, is supported by the IPCC, which wrote, “Lowering or removing such subsidies would contribute to global mitigation, but this has proved difficult.”

http://www.thenation.com/blog/179357/tax-breaks-are-killing-planet

31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Tax Breaks That Are Killing the Planet (Original Post) MindMover Apr 2014 OP
Wait just a second. I can understand how one may say depletion is a loophole (and I kelly1mm Apr 2014 #1
Don't cofuse the poor folks with accounting principles ..... oldhippie Apr 2014 #2
But this is from The Nation (although a blog). I would assume someone would at least kelly1mm Apr 2014 #3
The level of economic sophistication ...... oldhippie Apr 2014 #7
My first vocation was a financial planner with tooo many hours of accounting .... MindMover Apr 2014 #9
And I have an MBA in Finance .... oldhippie Apr 2014 #12
It certainly is, because we know that there are costs to doing business ... MindMover Apr 2014 #15
The EIC should pay it fair share of taxes. On that we agree! I will just leave it kelly1mm Apr 2014 #18
Under the current system, it is legal/legitimate to write off the cost of drilling a well ... MindMover Apr 2014 #19
K, now we are actually getting somewhere! You are making the point that certain costs of doing kelly1mm Apr 2014 #20
I have stated in my post #15 MindMover Apr 2014 #21
Being able to deduct costs from income to determine taxable profits isn't really a loophole. PoliticAverse Apr 2014 #27
According to our current tax code which has been bought and paid for by .... you know who ... MindMover Apr 2014 #29
the article handmade34 Apr 2014 #28
Your point is refreshing joeglow3 Apr 2014 #22
Again, I would expect this comment from an accountant ... MindMover Apr 2014 #23
And I expect this comment from someone not knowing what they are talking about joeglow3 Apr 2014 #24
Soon enough, your tax billing is going to get simpler .... MindMover Apr 2014 #25
Fortunately, I am damn good at GAAP joeglow3 Apr 2014 #26
Generally speaking that is ... MindMover Apr 2014 #30
Don't get me wrong, I agree with your sentiment joeglow3 Apr 2014 #31
And an accountant, I can certainly understand your reluctance to go to a simpler tax system ... nt MindMover Apr 2014 #5
Was that .... oldhippie Apr 2014 #6
It makes sense to disparage someone ranting about our tax system MindMover Apr 2014 #8
"And an accountant ..." ... oldhippie Apr 2014 #10
Because you stated "accounting principles" ... MindMover Apr 2014 #11
And you said ... oldhippie Apr 2014 #14
You used the words, "accounting principles" MindMover Apr 2014 #17
According to page 36,768, written by lawmakers who are bought and sold by Exxon ... MindMover Apr 2014 #4
I am NOT appologising for EXXON at all! Do they use loopholes? HELL YES! Is the cost kelly1mm Apr 2014 #13
see my comment 15 ..nt MindMover Apr 2014 #16

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
1. Wait just a second. I can understand how one may say depletion is a loophole (and I
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 07:29 PM
Apr 2014

understand also why one could say it is not a loophole) but the costs of drilling a well are not a loophole at all. It is part of the costs of goods sold. That would be like saying if I made a wiggit that I sold for $100, but it cost me $10 in materials and $10 in shipping costs, and $20 in labor costs, I would still have a profit of $100, rather than $60.

What am I missing here?

Even if you want to say that the cost of drilling the oil well should be depreciated/amortized over the life of the well, instead of accelerated/expensed, you still get to take the deduction as it is legitimately part of the cost of goods sold.

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
3. But this is from The Nation (although a blog). I would assume someone would at least
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 08:23 PM
Apr 2014

review it. Claiming the cost of goods sold deduction is a loophole is CRAZYTALK!

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
7. The level of economic sophistication ......
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:53 PM
Apr 2014

.... around here leaves much to be desired. Hearts are in the right place, but .......

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
9. My first vocation was a financial planner with tooo many hours of accounting ....
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:58 PM
Apr 2014

and your snarkiness is really just willful ignorance ...

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
12. And I have an MBA in Finance ....
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:05 PM
Apr 2014

So you think deducting the expense of drilling a well is a loophole, like the author of the article? Really?

And no, I am not an accountant, I am a retired Electronics Engineer.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
15. It certainly is, because we know that there are costs to doing business ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:15 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:54 PM - Edit history (1)

should every cost of doing business be deductible ... ?

I do not believe the deduction of drilling a well is justifiably warranted today ...

I do believe that at one time, before technology, the cost could have been deducted over a certain time period because of the wildcat nature of drilling over 50 years ago ... when we supposedly had to have oil to build the supercalifragilistic society on top of the hill we have today ....

But today, in the Energy Industrial Complex, they have bought our political system to underwrite thru the tax code the exploration and development and now destruction of our world ....

and it is way past the time that the EIC pay at the very least, its fair share of taxes ....

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
18. The EIC should pay it fair share of taxes. On that we agree! I will just leave it
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:58 PM
Apr 2014

at that as we seem to differ on what is and is not a legitimate cost of doing business.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
19. Under the current system, it is legal/legitimate to write off the cost of drilling a well ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:02 PM
Apr 2014

Is it moral or ethical, absolutely NOT ....

or is it a legal loophole, absolutely YES ...

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
20. K, now we are actually getting somewhere! You are making the point that certain costs of doing
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:16 PM
Apr 2014

business should be allowed and others should not. OK, and there is president for that! Like bribes. Bribes in many countries/cultures are a cost of doing business. Several years ago the IRS set forth that paying bribes, although a legitimate 'cost of doing business' could not be clamed as a deduction for cost of goods sold.

So, if I get your point, you are saying that the environmental impact of well drilling is so bad that that 'legitimate' cost of goods sold should be disallowed, just like bribes. Am I getting close to understanding your position?

I

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
21. I have stated in my post #15
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:18 PM
Apr 2014

I do believe that at one time, before technology, the cost could have been deducted over a certain time period because of the wildcat nature of drilling over 50 years ago ... when we supposedly had to have oil to build the supercalifragilistic society on top of the hill we have today ....

But today, in the Energy Industrial Complex, they have bought our political system to underwrite thru the tax code the exploration and development and now destruction of our world ....

and it is way past the time that the EIC pay at the very least, its fair share of taxes ....

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
27. Being able to deduct costs from income to determine taxable profits isn't really a loophole.
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 12:05 AM
Apr 2014

The only argument is over what period you amortize the costs for something like drilling a well.




MindMover

(5,016 posts)
29. According to our current tax code which has been bought and paid for by .... you know who ...
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 01:38 AM
Apr 2014

it is a legal loophole ....

handmade34

(22,756 posts)
28. the article
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 12:18 AM
Apr 2014

though not saying it seems to realize there are tremendous "external costs" to society from the oil industry that they conveniently don't have to pay for... we do!

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
22. Your point is refreshing
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:25 PM
Apr 2014

As a 15 year tax CPA, I have given up on addressing these articles. The authors are either negligent or incompetent.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
23. Again, I would expect this comment from an accountant ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:28 PM
Apr 2014

Nothing incompetent about calling out a legal loophole that should have been closed over three decades ago ....

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
24. And I expect this comment from someone not knowing what they are talking about
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:30 PM
Apr 2014

Like I said, I have given up. The ignorant usually want to stay ignorant.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
31. Don't get me wrong, I agree with your sentiment
Wed Apr 16, 2014, 10:40 AM
Apr 2014

I favor making the tax code as complicated as possible....until the day after I retire.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
8. It makes sense to disparage someone ranting about our tax system
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:56 PM
Apr 2014

by stating we do not understand accounting principles ...

I made the statement that an accountant would not like the present tax system to change because he/she makes there living off the complexity of the current system ... if this does not compute, then you are not listening ....

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
10. "And an accountant ..." ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:00 PM
Apr 2014

What did that mean? And why were you addressing it to me? I don't care.

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
14. And you said ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:12 PM
Apr 2014
And an accountant, I can certainly understand your reluctance to go to a simpler tax system ... nt


Even though I never stated any reluctance to go to a simpler tax system, or any reference to a tax system at all. And your "And an accountant ..." makes no sense. Did you mean "As an accountant ...."? Which still makes no sense as I never stated I was an accountant.

But never mind, I can see we are not connecting. Have a nice evening.



MindMover

(5,016 posts)
17. You used the words, "accounting principles"
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:23 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Tue Apr 15, 2014, 11:08 PM - Edit history (2)

and directed those words towards us dummies ...

and you will not acknowledge using them ...

obfuscation or perverse reactionism ....

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
4. According to page 36,768, written by lawmakers who are bought and sold by Exxon ...
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 09:46 PM
Apr 2014

Cmon, I can understand apologists and there rationale but when you have 75,000 pages you just can not apologize often enough ...

kelly1mm

(4,732 posts)
13. I am NOT appologising for EXXON at all! Do they use loopholes? HELL YES! Is the cost
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:05 PM
Apr 2014

of drilling a well and taking that cost as a deduction a loophole? HELL NO! Did the article YOU posted say that deducting the cost of the well was a loophole? Yes it did.

If you believe the cost of goods sold is somehow a loophole, please explain why.

I was just commenting on the article you posted. If you did not want comments, maybe you should not have posted it.

MindMover

(5,016 posts)
16. see my comment 15 ..nt
Tue Apr 15, 2014, 10:18 PM
Apr 2014

and who said I do not want comments ...

and if you do not like what I am commenting, then go back to your IRS apologist role

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Tax Breaks That Are K...