ALL The powerfull indictments to sue former Bush administration before an international court!

[mylye2222]

Following various discussions in GD today.

Let's cite all the indictments for putting on trial former administration, and , if it happens one day ( and I higly doubt it) being the justice be done once for all.

- Liars to invade Iraq.
- Torture
-Guantanamo concentration camp
-War crimes in Iraq, and Afghanistan
- Terrorizing American people to sold them the idea of war in Iraq
-Various corruption
- Abusive measures into the Patriot Act
- Harrasment of antiwar activists
-Various intimadation to Democrats, and by extense, everyone who stood against their policies
-Election fraud both in 2000 and 2004.




Anymore, folks????

[Politicalboi]

2. LOL!

[mylye2222]

3. Sorry, quite childish response

under a quite serious issue, even if utopic.

[MohRokTah]

6. If I could have understood what you were posting,...

perhaps a different response would have been appropriate.

I would suggest learning how to spell, and especially how to construct sentences.

This may help you:

http://www.bartleby.com/141/

[malaise]

7. Be nice

English is not the first language here.

[yeoman6987]

10. International Court?

I don't even think that is possible. The United States does not even fall under The Hague. The only way to do anything is in our own country and that would be The Congress!

[mylye2222]

11. Oh I didn't knew.

But is there not any exceptions when it comes to violation of international laws, such as Geneva Conventions? Cf: Torturing Middle East POW?

[yeoman6987]

12. No

It would cause all kinds of problems even if possible. He received permission from the Senate and House before starting the war. I am not sure that ignorance could be used by Democrats who voted for the war. Would we charge them too? See big mess which is one reason President Obama passed on doing anything.

[mylye2222]

13. yes, but a lot of Dem who voted that IWR were themselves abused and lied on their face

by falsifications coming directly from executive, right?

[yeoman6987]

19. They all had the same classified information

Now I don't know what Bush and company said to them closed doors but again there is no way that anything will come about this for so many reasons. Do I agree? No but I understand why they won't go after them.

[MohRokTah]

15. Nope, international court is not even remotely a possibility.

It's basically the biggest guns theory. The country with the biggest guns makes the rules about who can and cannot be prosecuted in an international court.

[JI7]

14. the poster is a foreigner and english is not their first language

no need to be rude. she is french .

[Lint Head]

4. Murder.

[mylye2222]

5. Who is the murder?

[malaise]

8. Welcome to DU

Lots more
terrorizing planet earth
destroying Iraq

[Lint Head]

9. Don't you mean who is the murderer? Easy. Read this book by the lawyer who put Charles Manson away.

[MohRokTah]

16. My apologies to the OP.

I did not realize you were French. After discovering that in this thread and re-reading your post it reads much like conversations I've had in conference calls with French speakers, both from Canada and from France.

[mylye2222]

17. You are welcome.

Peace.

[MohRokTah]

18. It's difficult to "hear" an accent in the written word.

[nadinbrzezinski]

20. I just take issue at calling Guantanamo a concentration camp

that term has very specific meaning. It is a crime though. It is just the term.