Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rsmith6621

(6,942 posts)
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 06:56 PM Apr 2014

If Rancher and American Terroist Cliven Bundy Were A Member of Occupy Wall Street.....



......and committed a stunt like he did the other day. The Feds would have shown up in RIOT GEAR, They would have likely TASED his ass and TEARED and PEPPER GASED him in to submission if not DEATH.

Funny how it is ok to protest about land you dont own and get away with it, but protest about ILL WILLED BANKERS, ECONOMIC INEQUALITY and CORPORATIONS and its almost a death sentence.
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If Rancher and American Terroist Cliven Bundy Were A Member of Occupy Wall Street..... (Original Post) rsmith6621 Apr 2014 OP
The difference between the parties Fumesucker Apr 2014 #1
you turn everything in to an attack of democrats. nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #5
I've been noticing that. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #6
? Fumesucker Apr 2014 #15
! MohRokTah Apr 2014 #16
I can see why Fumesucker Apr 2014 #17
Thank you. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #20
... Marr Apr 2014 #26
You turn everything into an attack on fellow DUers Fumesucker Apr 2014 #11
alert on it then nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #12
I love you too Fumesucker Apr 2014 #13
There is some basis in fact for that... nikto Apr 2014 #28
Technically no one actually disagreed Fumesucker Apr 2014 #32
Liberals break a window & it's lawless mayhem; DirkGently Apr 2014 #2
true that frylock Apr 2014 #10
K&R Teamster Jeff Apr 2014 #3
You might be right about that, sadly. nt AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #4
Occupiers aren't armed. Habibi Apr 2014 #7
Yup, or more. sakabatou Apr 2014 #8
these patriot heroes got all wadded up over a BLM agent pointing a paintball gun at them frylock Apr 2014 #9
exactly n/t 2pooped2pop Apr 2014 #14
Nailed it malaise Apr 2014 #18
Why the hell wasn't this guy on the scene? TroglodyteScholar Apr 2014 #19
Because he most likely christx30 Apr 2014 #22
... or a Shoshone cattle rancher on the same land who didn't even commit the stunt ... Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2014 #21
The Feds are only scared of the Left. Shows you their real worldview, irregardless of the phony PR blkmusclmachine Apr 2014 #23
Matt Bors Illustrates: n2doc Apr 2014 #24
Well they don't think the public should own land zeemike Apr 2014 #25
Thanks to right-wing fraudcasters ... JEFF9K Apr 2014 #27
Post removed Post removed Apr 2014 #29
No, being a freakin' millionaire freeloading sack of shit... 99Forever Apr 2014 #30
Bullshit. Bundy's rights were not infringed on, he was abusing OUR land. scarletwoman Apr 2014 #31
Where were the undercover feds egging them on to DiverDave Apr 2014 #33
A rancher fighting over a little land is no threat to the 1% the way OWS was davidn3600 Apr 2014 #34
Cliven Bundy is wealthy. Occupiers were not Generic Brad Apr 2014 #35
Typo - terrorist grahamhgreen Apr 2014 #36
The Bundy people were heavily armed. Progressive dog Apr 2014 #37
 

nikto

(3,284 posts)
28. There is some basis in fact for that...
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:39 PM
Apr 2014

...If what we observe of both parties' actions mean anything.

Some Democrats are excepted, ofcourse.
But so many lean towards the siren-$ong of corporate money.

I remember Rahm Emmanuel calling Liberals "fuckheads" or something.
And that is just the tip of the iceberg.

The people who disagree with your statement need to forget a lot of things that have happened to feel that way.

I am so tired of reminding them!

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
32. Technically no one actually disagreed
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 10:11 PM
Apr 2014

The comments were about me rather than the content of what I wrote.

I think Rahm's comment was along the line of fornicating cognitively challenged or something.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
2. Liberals break a window & it's lawless mayhem;
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 07:03 PM
Apr 2014

Conservatives point rifles at law enforcement and the cops apologize.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
22. Because he most likely
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:05 PM
Apr 2014

would have seen people that are willing to defend themselves and either run the other way, or he would have been shot.
Either way wouldn't bother me.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
23. The Feds are only scared of the Left. Shows you their real worldview, irregardless of the phony PR
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:15 PM
Apr 2014

that is coming out of Washington DC right now.

I've seen the enemy. And he is us.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
25. Well they don't think the public should own land
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 09:33 PM
Apr 2014

And they want it all...the goal is to privatize everything...and return us to the days of kings where the kings owned all the land and his subjects lived on it at his pleasure.

Response to rsmith6621 (Original post)

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
30. No, being a freakin' millionaire freeloading sack of shit...
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 10:02 PM
Apr 2014

.. that calls in a bunch of dumbassed gunfreaks that take aim on Federal Authorities doing their sworn duty is domestic terrorism.

Understand now?


Enjoy your stay.

scarletwoman

(31,893 posts)
31. Bullshit. Bundy's rights were not infringed on, he was abusing OUR land.
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 10:03 PM
Apr 2014

Federal land is OUR land, our collective heritage, our Commons - it's the land that's been set aside to belong to ALL of us.

His cattle ranch is the "corporation" in this scenario. He wants to usurp OUR land for his private use without paying for it.

You have it totally backwards.

DiverDave

(4,886 posts)
33. Where were the undercover feds egging them on to
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 10:28 PM
Apr 2014

commit worse violence?
It seems that every peaceful protest has people screaming to pick up rocks, make bombs ( that they provide the ingredients for)
and basically incite violence so they can arrest peaceful, lawful protesters.

Where were they?

Generic Brad

(14,274 posts)
35. Cliven Bundy is wealthy. Occupiers were not
Fri Apr 18, 2014, 10:39 PM
Apr 2014

Our government bends over backwards to appease those with perceived wealth. Those without money get rubber bullets, tear gas and plastic handcuffs.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
37. The Bundy people were heavily armed.
Sat Apr 19, 2014, 02:35 PM
Apr 2014

The occupiers were not. In the case of Bundy. the government was trying to avoid a situation where people would be killed. The terrorists had lots of women and children to use as shields.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Rancher and American T...