General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you benefit from white privilege
you'll never be told to get over it.
Benefitting from white privilege means you can walk the Earth unaware of your color.
ananda
(28,867 posts)How to heal racism and level the playing field is the only real issue.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)victims POV. They must derail with being the word police (privilege is the wrong word). I'm telling you, after a while, you may begin to think it's not really about the words being used, it's a mindset.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Thought I'd give you some kudos for that, before I leave this thread.
vi5
(13,305 posts)I'm as white as they come. My dad grew up poor and worked his ass off to rise out of that and become a successful business man. It doesn't diminish his hard work at all, but despite being fairly liberal folks they don't see that because his hard work and success came in the 60's and 70's that it was still legal and acceptable for companies and colleges and everything else to discriminate against people of color and women. He thinks that pointing this out is saying he didn't work hard or had things handed to him, which he didn't. But he definitely still had a massive advantage being a white male.
They also get mad when I point out that a lot of my own success was because I had/have the opportunity of being a white male born into a financial successful white family who could afford tutors, who could afford college, who could afford to support me while I took unpaid internships, etc.
The problem is that the people who benefit from this privelige thinks that it negates the work they did put in or their own skills or intelligence, which it doesn't. It's just a matter of asking people to understand and appreciate the opportunities and privilges that they did have and not pretend that everyone has those same opportunities.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)that for others, for reasons based on race and sex, it is harder to reach those goals or get those same opportunities, would go a long way toward healing and moving forward.
vi5
(13,305 posts)When I talk it through with them they get it and they agree. But if nobody is their keeping them in check about it they tend to go off on the "Well nobody handed me anything..." shtick. Which again, is true but I try to keep them remembering that not only didn't people of color and women not get handed anything either, they were actively prohibited or kept out of many of the same opportunities even if they put in the same amount of work.
Response to boston bean (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Problem solved now, you can pat yourself on the back.
Feel better now?
Response to bravenak (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You poor guy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Starting to feel pity for them now, all the terrible things they are forced to read and reply to on the internet that oppresses them.
boston bean
(36,222 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)It's still early though.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Love it.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)right? It seems that if all that enjoy the privileges and entitlements that this society offers it's citizens, unencumbered by race, sex or sexual orientation, demand and make sure that all are entitled to the same privileges and entitlements, that would go a loooonnnnggg way toward leveling ALL playing fields. Am I wrong or is there not such a thing as 'white privilege' in this country? Stop being oppressed and make sure none are oppressed.
Response to bravenak (Reply #7)
heaven05 This message was self-deleted by its author.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)my mistake, reading posts too fast meant for someone else
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I figured.
Somebody got a pizza this morning.
The comments were so bad i saved them so i can read them again later.
Poor thing needed some attention.
randys1
(16,286 posts)period
bigotry is a personal act
the word racism EXISTS to distinguish from bigotry as it was practiced by societal groups and governments
When the so called liberals grow up and accept this fact, and are willing to deal with racism, then and only then do we get somewhere, surely you cant expect righwingers to do it if liberals cant
so sad
Response to randys1 (Reply #11)
Name removed Message auto-removed
randys1
(16,286 posts)I wont argue with alleged grownups anymore, who by denying the meaning of racism are DENYING their privilege...
Response to randys1 (Reply #16)
Name removed Message auto-removed
randys1
(16,286 posts)You deny what racism and white privilege is, I dont...that is about it
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Think about it.
Try to figure out what that means smarty mcmarty.
randys1
(16,286 posts)it is sickening how so many of them arent progressive or liberal AT ALL
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Thats what this is.
You're seeing this shit right? Proof that i don't make this shit up. Everyday it's something different.
Either here a home i have white dudes telling me they want the country for blacks and whites only, because get this, " things were better for ALL of us when it was just us whites and blacks"
This was after he told me to go watch Roots, learn to shut up and stay in a womans place, tried to force his 100 pound girl friend to hit me, mooned me, called himself a viking,then he thinks i would want to live in a country alone with him.
Or i get the same damn question everyday and a dumbass websters dictionary definition.
There must be something about me that forces people to be asses.
Oh, woe is me!! Help!!!
randys1
(16,286 posts)The help these idiots need can be found in Obamacare, section IV, Mental Health...
Response to bravenak (Reply #22)
Name removed Message auto-removed
boston bean
(36,222 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Barely just met you just like now, ok?
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Goodness, you do realize that this same argument has been had before and you guys lose everytime?
Like everyday someone new comes with their dictionary definition.
And everyday we do not care about your dictionary.
We are going to keep using the sociologists definition no matter how many times somebody comes in with a dictionary.
This is so funny.
Its like how creationists use the dictionary definition of theory to disprove evolution, because its just a 'theory' to them. They refuse to open a science book and read the scientists definition for theory.
Because what their dictionary says is what they're sticking to. No matter how many times they are told what the word theory really means.
randys1
(16,286 posts)a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
white privilege racists have managed to add meanings to the word to justify their horrid existence
bravenak
(34,648 posts)After all the crap during the Zimmerman trial, i knew what time it was.
randys1
(16,286 posts)I assume 100% of DU members who claim to be Democrats agree that both are guilty of murder?
I remember OJ, and thinking that he was probably guilty, but to watch the anger of the white community over the fact that maybe once out of millions of times that a Black guy might just get away with something, it was astounding.
Millions of times that Black people have been found guilty, whether they were or not.
And then I ask myself, "why do you think he is guilty?"
I have a friend who is a lawyer who works to help people who have been brutalized by police, who told me that the evidence was so obviously and badly tampered with that a guilty verdict would be total injustice.
On Friday night fights on Sirius Mark Thompson/Mapfumo Matsimela on channel 127 he always turns the music up too loud...
and laughs about it, as I do with him
Would love to park outside the prison cell that pile of filth Dunn is at and turn the music up
bravenak
(34,648 posts)They made me cry i got so upset. I forced myself to forget the names so that i wouldn't take it out on them later.
People also like to call US the racist ones. And white dudes can use the n word but i myself have to literally say n-word. They can use the real word, but if i do, i get the alert.
If somebody writes a racist op, you will get your post hidden for saying the op was racist, even though the author admits to being racially 'insensitive', you saying something and hurting their feelings is much worse. They will bring in somebody of authority to give you a lecture.
I stay amused.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)C'mon man, this isn't hard to understand. Not at all. Especially not for liberals.
If a person of, say, Thai or Saudi heritage says that he thinks that all black people are gangsters, or that all Latinos are drug addicts, or that all Native Americans are idiotic drunkards, or that all white people are greedy selfish know-it-alls.....then yes, that person is a personal racist. So too if they believe that their race is superior to all others(example: Louis Farrakhan); even if it isn't necessarily supported *institutionally*, in their case. Intolerance of a collective group, one of the most common forms of racism, is not limited to any one ethnic group or any one country. For example, in Israel, Palestinians may be a minority, and an oft maltreated minority, but a Palestinian who believes that all Jews are money-grubbing parasites, or part of a secret cabal to destroy the Muslim world, is also a racist, even if the "institution", as it were, may be stacked against them. So if we can acknowledge that a few Palestinians are anti-Semitic racists, then why can we not also knowledge that a few of minority groups are racist themselves, while also keeping the realities of structural racism in mind? It's honestly not that hard.
I hope this gives you some food for thought, if nothing else.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over.
Yet you still have that smug attitude while you talk down to people as if your intellect is just so very superior to theirs, and you act as if you are doing a person a favor by 'explaining' it to them every day. The exaspeation you must feel when nobody takes your advise, forcing you to jump back in there every day and fight the good fight.
I know you don't believe in WP. But you do resemble it in the forceful way you demand that people define term on your terms. And you seem quite offended that nobody listens. I mean, why don't we recognize the favor you are doing us by framing the narrative.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4945891
Funniest post ever?!
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)
I mean, why don't we recognize the favor you are doing us by framing the narrative.
I truly don't like to say this, but do you realize the irony in that? Do you? All I've done here is just pointed out what is pretty much universally accepted, including by most liberals, of both genders and many different ethnic groups. I honestly don't see why you take such umbrage towards this, no matter how opinionated I myself may be(which I'll admit is true).
But honestly, I'm not sure what I can point out that I haven't already. You and I are probably on the same page on perhaps 80% of the issues, including those involving ethnic issues.....but it's that 20% that seems to really bother you. Whatever exasperation on my part has been largely because of overreactions and, unfortunately, even some mudslinging thrown in my direction.
I didn't come here to start any fights but to chip in and offer some legitimate conversation. But perhaps it'd be better to bow out because nothing good will come out of it. Take it as you may.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)You are quite vocal and arrogant when speaking on racial matters and it appears to me that you think you know more about racism than those affected by racism. And you don't.
Instead of listening to what we have to say, you argue all the live long day about what words mean and then you tell us ' you don't BELIEVE in white privilege, therefore it does not exist.
Heres what i think about that:http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4945891
Then you talk down to us in a better than thou manner and wonder why there is friction there.
Why would black people be mad that a young white male takes it upon himself to 'school' them on racism without realizing how that makes him look?
Do you understand how bad it looks for a young white male to be lecturing black people on racism day after day in a very agressive manner, while insulting their intelligence at the same time?
It looks bad, dear. You should stop trying to always have the last word and please stop trying to define words for us. Especially me. Never ever have i needed a young white make to explain what words mean to me and the fact that you continue doing it on a daily basis leaves me wondering what your intentions are.
You are speaking with generally well read and educated black people who have earned the right to speak for themselves without you playing word nanny.
Do you get it now?
randys1
(16,286 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)you have not a clue. Very clever how all that you said was slowly moving away from THE FACT that those white males that are aware of their racial privilege, by and large, take advantage of those privileges while denying that those particular privileges are denied to others based on race usually, and/or sex and sexual orientation. Race is the key in this discussion. The amerikkkan way of denying white privilege, that you are using, is a prime example of american denial. The food is in front of you, eat some or continue starving.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)boston bean
(36,222 posts)They just don't have the guts to say what they mean outright.
Response to boston bean (Reply #25)
Name removed Message auto-removed
boston bean
(36,222 posts)or else!
Response to boston bean (Reply #36)
Name removed Message auto-removed
boston bean
(36,222 posts)equal racism.
Reverse racism arguments, use to be looked down upon here... Now I'm not so sure, so you just might be ok.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Like get over it,seriously. No. You got your answer, whatever it is you want, no. Just no.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)So things like red-lining by banks are racism.
People who have ill feelings toward others they perceive to be of a certain race is prejudice. Many people can be prejudiced but few have the power to practice racism directly.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Because all that's required for personal racism is a hate, distrust, etc., of a collective group, or the belief that one is superior to said group......whereas institutional racism is pretty much this, mostly, but practiced by people in power.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)but for Pete's sake, the difference in usage has been explained here at least a thousand times. Ditto what "privilege" means in a similar context.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)For example, a recent immigrant from Mexico who may have had some nasty run-ins with, say, a Klansman or a neo-Nazi in Texas, Arizona or Mississippi, may not be terribly willing to trust Southern whites all that much. And so that *is* prejudice. But if he does not transfer that mistrust & fear to whites as whole, then he does not become a racist. But if he does, then he may, depending on the exact prejudices.
Similarly, perhaps a Vietnamese American born in California runs into a problem with some gang members in Oakland or Compton, who happen to be black. Now, he may feel uneasy around black folks from the West Coast, but, if he moves to, say, Brick Township, N.J., and he does not transfer those prejudices, he does not cross the line into outright racism, even if he does remain prejudiced against SOME blacks. But if he DOES transfer that hatred & distrust to ALL blacks, then he may also become a racist.
Of course, this is only a thought experiment, but I hope you can understand where I'm coming from.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)no matter how much you or anyone else wants to believe they are.
Racism does not -- and cannot - go both ways. That would only be possible if the world were vastly different than it is.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Or imply that. I would kindly suggest you read my post again, because I made it clear that they were *not* necessarily the exact same thing.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)It is cringe-inducing stuff.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)These are the consequences we must face. ( i wish it would stop)
I am seriously cracking up right now, i just can't.
Performance Art?!
How can you ask the same questions everyday and never remember the answer?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)I hope. Please.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)than I do this place.
Which I guess is a good thing.
The world will leave DU behind.
Kind of weird to think what was once the greatest, biggest progressive, liberal, Democratic website will have to be dragged kicking and screaming into a better world.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Does it everyday, no fail.
This here is a joke. Somebody is laughing their asses off somewhere at my earnest replies.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)bless you for trying and, for doing it with tact and class.
You have patience, kindness and good will in you heart.
You are a treasure.
Also, you are pretty damn smart, too
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I try not to take certain people seriously anymore.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)The DU angst of the month
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)If you don't wish to participate in a discussion (however, here you are!), you can simply go to your account, click on your trash can and add words/phrases. Voila! Done! No more hurting.
I currently have:
Pope
Duggar
Woody Allen
2016
Added to mine. Try it. You'll like it.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Thanks!
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Or is complaining just too irresistible?
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Right. I forgot it's your mission to shut up people who don't seek your permission before posting something. How dare she--you know--be a liberal.
Katashi_itto
(10,175 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)boston bean
(36,222 posts)tells us so much more about you than you could ever know.
Thanks for being so transparent.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Thank you for everything that you do here.
pintobean
(18,101 posts)that Nye probably watched Sesame Street as a child.
stage left
(2,962 posts)the ship depicted would be the Lusitania, and not the Titanic. The Titanic struck an iceberg.
UtahLib
(3,179 posts)"The ones I like." With the slightest introspection, that should have some people squirming.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)rrneck
(17,671 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)I think.
That's an awful cartoon though.
I mean suppose I had a black friend (a huge assumption right there - that I would have a friend) and he was called a thug by somebody and came to me for emotional support. And I went off on a rant on how it is not my purpose in life to ensure black people that they aren't thugs.
I mean, I kinda thought we were friends, not that I was "white people".
And who says "get over it"?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Judge Judy
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)but presumably not talking about slavery when she says it.