General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTim Geithner Criticizes Elizabeth Warren In New Book
Source: Huffington Post
The Huffington Post | by Igor Bobic
Posted: 05/12/2014 11:30 am EDT Updated: 05/12/2014 3:59 pm EDT
Timothy Geithner had some critical words for Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in a new memoir reflecting upon his time as treasury secretary before and after the 2008 financial crisis.
The book, entitled "Stress Test," recounts Geithner's thoughts and interactions with members of the Obama administration as it sought to repair the nation's financial system and subsequently implement the Wall Street reforms commonly referred to as Dodd-Frank.
Warren, at the time a consumer advocate and law professor who ran Congress' TARP oversight panel, was briefly considered the top choice to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Due to concerns that a polarizing, progressive choice would not be able to muster enough Democratic support in the Senate, she was instead given the job of creating the agency under the auspices of Geithner. In her own book, she said she nearly turned the post down because she was worried, in part, about interference from the treasury secretary.
They didnt want to vote for a controversial liberal at a conservative moment, Geithner wrote about Warren. They were also worried about the intense opposition in the business community.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/12/tim-geithner-warren_n_5310503.html
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)and President Obama for selecting him.
laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)Entitled ass.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)He's a wall street guy; so he probably believes that at that moment, Wall Street was chastened by the failure of all the new baffling complex investment vehicles they had invented which had subsequently blown up. They didn't need to be regulated by Elizabeth Warren because they were already in a "conservative" frame of mind, and unlikely to make the same mistakes.
Of course that's a pretty self serving narrative; while it's true that perhaps at that specific moment Wall Street was less inclined towards fanciful investments, in the same sense that everybody is a good driver for a few weeks after they are in an accident, they would return to their reckless ways soon enough. And I'd feel a lot better with Warren overlooking their "innovations."
Bryant
Jefferson23
(30,099 posts)long history of failures. This does not serve him, who the fuck does he think he is fooling any longer?
snip*Her [bailout] oversight hearings often felt more like made-for-YouTube inquisitions than serious inquiries, Geithner wrote about Warren, according to The Hill. She was worried about the right things but she was better at impugning our choices as well as our intentions and our competence than identifying any feasible alternatives.
Omg, just stop it already.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Like a bossy third-grade teacher, I looked at him and said, Put on your seat belt, Mr. Secretary,? Warren writes. Like a naughty kid, he looked back and said, I dont have to.?
They continued arguing the point, and Warren thinks she raised her voice.
He didnt put on his seat belt all the way to the restaurant, she writes. On the way back, after debating the role of government in the financial markets, he did put on his seat belt.
Not wearing a seat belt is really, really dumb.
Liberalynn
(7,549 posts)WhiteTara
(29,718 posts)F You, you sellout.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and finding that they can reach the front page by praising Warren, Gore, and Sanders up the wazoo--"iraqbrother," "peachcoppice"
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)sure doesn't sound critical at all.
Response to Eugene (Original post)
Nye Bevan This message was self-deleted by its author.