General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEnthusiast
(50,983 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)toby jo
(1,269 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)getting rid of the military industrial complex. Imagine a world where we were not killing 10 children for every 1 terrorist with drones.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)dilby
(2,273 posts)to love their children more than they hate any possible foreign enemy. Because if you truly love your child you will not want them dying in a war that is unneeded and only puts profits into the pockets of corporations.
japple
(9,833 posts)from which group he parted company some years ago. I think he still teaches Sunday School in his home church in Plains, GA.
dilby
(2,273 posts)Well that explains why he did not dismantle the military industrial complex when president, thanks for shattering my image of the guy.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)Herbert Hoover is the other Quaker President. As to Quaker I also retell the story told by Hugh Henry Brackenridge, a lawyer involved in the Whiskey Rebellion of 1794. The Hugh Henry Brackenridge made the comment that the only person convicted of Treason in the Whiskey Rebellion, was convicted do to bad lawyering. The man's attorney opted for an all Quaker Jury. Hugh Henry Brackenridge said Quakers were good to have on juries when it comes to regular crimes, Quakers would tend to want to minimize the sentence BUT AS TO TREASON OR ANY OTHER CRIME INVOLVING REBELLION OR CIVIL UNREST THEY WILL CONVICT QUICKER THEN ANYONE ELSE. Thus Hugh Henry Brackenridge kept Quakers off the juries his client faced, and they all walked, the one man who faced an all Quaker Jury was the only man convicted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Henry_Brackenridge
Quakers tend to opt for ORDER, the Quakers and the Anglicans (Anglicans) were the two "Groups" at the time of the American Revolution that were the most likely to be pro-British for both (at that time period, we are discussing the late 1700s) prefer stability to radical change. Presbyterians and Congregationalists were the most supportive of the Revolution (Through in the Whiskey Rebellion, tended to oppose the Revolt, which came out of the Militia as oppose to the Churches, most secular social groups had not yet developed by the 1790s, thus any movement came out of the Churches prior to the 1790s (The Churches were the one thing most people belonged to, so often people divided on Religious grounds, even on non-religious issues for they support group were the other members of their Church). The Whiskey Rebellion is the first time a movement came out of something other then the Churches (Through some of the earlier Indian conflicts came out of a combination of Churches and Militia for in all Colonial Governments, the Militia formation was tied in with what ever church was in the area).
Just a comment on Quakers of the 1790s, that they prefer ORDER to CIVIL UNREST and to a degree that survives to this day.
japple
(9,833 posts)ETA: Do your homework. Almost anything is available online just for teh google. Don't blame anyone for bustin' your bubble.
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)Nixon was a Quaker. Kind of ironic.
japple
(9,833 posts)LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)Sr. William Marie, told us to tell our parents not to vote for Nixon in 1960 because as a Quaker he wouldn't defend the country.
TygrBright
(20,762 posts)He, himself, never professed, to my knowledge.
informatively,
Bright
whistler162
(11,155 posts)or at least born to Quaker families.
onecaliberal
(32,864 posts)President Carter. I wish you were able to run for office today. We need more like you.
Augiedog
(2,548 posts)Tribalceltic
(1,000 posts)ChazInAz
(2,569 posts)Proud to have voted for him!
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Even me.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)I think he is a fine person
Terra Alta
(5,158 posts)but I do admire what he has accomplished post-Presidency with his humanitarian work. He is a true example of how Christians should be.
flvegan
(64,409 posts)"Christian values" are so lost on far, far too many "Christians" who make it all about them, or something else. ANYthing but the values they pretend to believe in.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, TexasTowelie.
Leith
(7,809 posts)How fundies (like the so-called "Moral Majority" of the time) could say that they wanted a president who was one of them (meaning religious), yet they threw Carter over for a divorced Hollywood insider and former union head who hadn't gone to church in decades. Gore and Clinton were also Baptists.
That just tells me that what they say and what they mean have nothing to do with each other.