Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:00 AM May 2014

The Pick-Up Artist Community’s Predictable, Horrible Response to a Mass Murder

By Amanda Hess

On Friday night, a gunman killed six people in Santa Barbara, and the killer himself was found dead with a gunshot wound to his head. Soon after police began investigating the crime, 22-year-old student Elliot Rodger emerged as the main suspect. Like many modern mass murders, this one left a robust digital trail, including a video Rodger recently posted to YouTube where he parks his BMW in front of a bank of palm trees and describes his plan to seek retribution from the women who have rejected him. Rodger calls himself the “perfect guy” and a “supreme gentleman” who’s been overlooked by women who prefer “obnoxious brutes.” Then he lays out his plans to “enter the hottest sorority house of [the University of California, Santa Barbara], and … slaughter every single spoiled, stuck-up blonde slut I see inside there.” To “all those girls I’ve desired so much,” he says, “you will finally see that I am the superior one, the true alpha male.”

Rodger’s language is familiar to anyone who’s spent time exploring the Pick-Up Artist or Men’s Rights Activist communities. Rodger was a “Nice Guy,” a man who feels he is entitled to sex based on positive personality traits known only to him. (“I've wanted love, affection, adoration. You think I’m unworthy of it. That's a crime that can never be forgiven,” he said). He aspired to be an “Alpha," the most attractive, dominant man in his group, but felt he’s been wrongly dismissed as an inferior “Beta.” Pick-Up Artists, by the way, refer to women they would like to have sex with as their “targets.”

Rodger was also allegedly a member of PUAHate.com, a website for men who feel they’ve been tricked by the Pick-Up Artist pyramid scheme, which takes men’s money and promises to teach them how to have sex with women. (And not just any woman, but one who scores at least a 7 on the PUA decimal rating scale of female attractiveness.) PUA Hate is a community devoted to criticizing the Pick-Up Artist movement and “the scams, deception, and misleading marketing techniques used by dating gurus and the seduction community to deceive men and profit from them." It is not, however, interested in putting an end to the PUA community’s objectification of women; it simply complains that the tips and tricks don’t work.


~snip~

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/05/24/elliot_rodger_the_pick_up_artist_community_s_predictable_horrible_response.html
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pick-Up Artist Community’s Predictable, Horrible Response to a Mass Murder (Original Post) ZombieHorde May 2014 OP
... shenmue May 2014 #1
"It is not, however, interested in putting an end to the PUA community’s objectification of women; redqueen May 2014 #2
I think PUA's and MRA's are a symptom of the problem and not necessarily the source. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #3
I didn't 'simply state it was a product of misogyny' redqueen May 2014 #5
I think we're actually in agreement. Apologies for the confusion. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #6
i personally see it seabeyond May 2014 #8
I agree - take someone that is already a narcissist Aerows May 2014 #7
agree Katashi_itto May 2014 #23
+1 cui bono May 2014 #4
To be fair, while there is overlap, they're distinct. joshcryer May 2014 #9
I've just read the redpill stuff and see where's there is 30% truth and 70% BS to justify degrading uponit7771 May 2014 #12
I looked at red pill yesterday, and have seen some of the same crap there posted at DU bettyellen May 2014 #19
No MRA ideas have any appeal, especially not a logical one. They are all ignorant as shit redqueen May 2014 #22
It wasn't the sole factor, but IMO his involvement with MRA's and their attitudes . . . Triana May 2014 #10
That's nothing, from his manifesto (trigger warnings): joshcryer May 2014 #11
I had no sympathy for him standingtall May 2014 #13
Ditto. +1 LiberalLoner May 2014 #15
Holy Moly! nt Mojorabbit May 2014 #16
Much like the eugenicists of (not-so-)old, he has a grade-schooler's understanding of genetics. nomorenomore08 May 2014 #20
How much do MRA attitudes as expressed by Elliot Rodger affect legislation today? Triana May 2014 #21
I had never heard of standingtall May 2014 #14
Blame everyone except the one's truely responsible 951-Riverside May 2014 #17
Isn't the one "truly responsible" the one who pulled the trigger? JJChambers May 2014 #18

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
2. "It is not, however, interested in putting an end to the PUA community’s objectification of women;
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:17 AM
May 2014

it simply complains that the tips and tricks don’t work."

Exactly. People here complaining that it's wrong to link PUA and MRA communities, and using the fact that he was aligned with a forum called "PUAHate.com" to try to claim he disliked PUA bullshit, and was therefore not an MRA (or something) are completely failing to comprehend what these groups are about.

Sexual objectification is part and parcel of this entitlement that so many men feel toward women's bodies.

It goes hand in hand with misogyny and iIt's time to stop pretending it's some fuzzy, ill-defined, confusing concept - and start treating it like the serious issue it is.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
3. I think PUA's and MRA's are a symptom of the problem and not necessarily the source.
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:27 AM
May 2014

Although it all ultimately co-mingles. What I'm saying, however, is that groups like pick-up artists and men's rights advocates seem to have distinct dysfunction, like narcissistic personality disorder, that interacts with misogyny to create these inevitable outcomes.

I don't think this latest spree killer is the product of the PUA movement. I don't think the PUA movement generates narcissists. It attracts them and helps their narcissism grow, if that makes sense.

We have to treat movements like the PUA as a legitimate social illness which creates an atmosphere of false-victimization and then uses misogyny to make women the enemy. Rather than simply stating it's all a product of misogyny.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
5. I didn't 'simply state it was a product of misogyny'
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:37 AM
May 2014

not sure what your point is.

Society itself is deeply misogynist. It is woven into the fabric of patriarchal society. Its messages permeate almost all forms of communication.

All this shit is connected, and simply treating the symptoms will not cure the disease.

Gravitycollapse

(8,155 posts)
6. I think we're actually in agreement. Apologies for the confusion.
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:43 AM
May 2014

I see two distinct issues here. Misogyny and, in the case of this person and the PUA movement, narcissistic personality disorder. We have to treat both if we want to do away with either.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
8. i personally see it
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:48 AM
May 2014

as an obsession with male sexuality to such an extent that all of us learn, and especially boys, how extraordinarily special and awesome male sexuality is. i do not know how any man can grow up in htis society without an extent of entitlement and womens purpose is use.... even the best of guys.

it is so pervasive and all consuming, all the time, from day one. women presented to men, for use, one way or another.

i think that is the bottom line addressing needs to be done. admitted, recognized and addressed.

the pua and mra of the world merely feeds on this to the point of unhealthy when there will be one to do damage like this. on line allows people to connect in opinion and ideas that validate.

like with the evo psych... ow that flourishes, only to reinforce this belief and behavior that it is innately males right.

i am not even suggesting that all men are to the extreme levels, but i am saying, that all of us, men women, boys girls, are conditioned with the ever obsessive focus on male sexuality.

we cannot even say that it is women, with al the naked women put out there, cause that is solely the purpose of being used.... for male sexuality. nothing to do with a womans sexuality.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
7. I agree - take someone that is already a narcissist
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:48 AM
May 2014

and has entitlement issues, then introduce them to a community that allows both of those to flourish along with their misogyny, and it is a recipe for disaster.

Then add in that such things like PUA and the MRA that believe that *they* are the true victims (nevermind whatever they did to harm or drive women away in the first place) and it exposes a deep, societal sickness.

That societal sickness must be addressed, though, to be honest, as mentally ill as Rodgers was, I'm pretty sure he would have ended up in one conflagration or another anyway, no matter how much help, support and counseling he got.

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
9. To be fair, while there is overlap, they're distinct.
Sun May 25, 2014, 02:53 AM
May 2014

The vast majority of PUA/RedPill people think women need to be treated as subservient pigs and the only way to deal with them properly is to be alpha males, etc.

Counter to MRAs who want to treat women equally as men and find areas where they think there is an equality gap (for example, Male Abortion; this is a real thing; the desire of a male to recuse himself from having to facilitate the raising of a child). These MRAs would advocate women getting 100% pay for 100% work, really, they would. They're consistent in that view.

There is a subgroup, however, of MRAs who are PUA/RedPill people, who actually think that it requires certain behaviors to interact with women and that if they don't treat women ostensibly as shit, then they aren't being alpha enough. In general this subgroup is rejected by the larger MRA movement as a whole because they obviously see it as a distraction. Here's a post where a PUA/RedPill person got "downvoted" on Reddit (it's like being "unrec'd&quot .

Note: I am not an MRA though I can see some appeal in some of the arguments (if only from a logical perspective), I think it's a misguided approach. Importantly, I think, while I disagree with almost all of DUers MRA advocates here (some of whom are some of my least liked posters on this forum), I think the arguments are coherent. PUA/RedPill advocates, however, are pretty much scum, there is nothing they have of value to contribute to anything.

uponit7771

(90,339 posts)
12. I've just read the redpill stuff and see where's there is 30% truth and 70% BS to justify degrading
Sun May 25, 2014, 05:35 AM
May 2014

... or objectifying women. It's like some have to hold women in context to justify the redpill logic

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
19. I looked at red pill yesterday, and have seen some of the same crap there posted at DU
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:24 AM
May 2014

so maybe that's the reason the MRAers are here are so unpopular.

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
22. No MRA ideas have any appeal, especially not a logical one. They are all ignorant as shit
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:48 AM
May 2014

and they are all rooted in either outright misogyny or a sad failure (or childish, stubborn unwillingness) to recognize that their problem is with patriarchal ideas - not women and certainly not feminists.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
10. It wasn't the sole factor, but IMO his involvement with MRA's and their attitudes . . .
Sun May 25, 2014, 03:17 AM
May 2014

. . . are a contributing one. Case in point:



This is from that PUAHate site, which has since taken his posts down, but they're supposedly (I haven't looked) archived here: http://archive.today/oV0ck

joshcryer

(62,270 posts)
11. That's nothing, from his manifesto (trigger warnings):
Sun May 25, 2014, 03:55 AM
May 2014




There's a lot more but this was the worst that I saw. I know people will not like this but I feel sorry for him, he's beyond pathetic. This is the part that just made me sickened by his utter failure as a human being:



This is all around fucked up and pitiful.

standingtall

(2,785 posts)
13. I had no sympathy for him
Sun May 25, 2014, 06:02 AM
May 2014

And after reading that I have even less if possible. He thought he was like a god. I already knew he thought that way. That just confirmed my opinion of him. 'Put all the women in concentration camps and starve most of them to death and gleefully watch them die.' Sick! 'Artificially inseminate the rest for reproductive purposes in a secret lab.' Absurd. Not to mention the paraphrase of the classic if I can't have you no one can line that just about every stalker/slash rape murderer uses at some point.

nomorenomore08

(13,324 posts)
20. Much like the eugenicists of (not-so-)old, he has a grade-schooler's understanding of genetics.
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:33 AM
May 2014

Among many other things, obviously.

*Edit: "Sexuality will completely cease to exist"? "Love will cease to exist"? Sure as hell doesn't sound like a world worth living in...

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
21. How much do MRA attitudes as expressed by Elliot Rodger affect legislation today?
Sun May 25, 2014, 10:36 AM
May 2014

in Re: women's repro rights. I think a LOT. (War on Women)

Yet this misogyny, this hatred of and desire for total control of women and their repro rights, is totally ignored by the media.

Isn't it interesting that conservatives also think women should have no say about their repro rights or who they 'breed' with?

How do I know what they "think"? We can see what they DO in the form of legislation, which takes all choice from women in these same areas. It's no coincidence.

Misogyny isn't the only issue in the Elliot Rodger massacre. But it will be the most ignored one.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Pick-Up Artist Commun...