Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
Sun May 25, 2014, 12:34 PM May 2014

In Chambers Order Dismiss Haas v Romney Racketeering Case!

Source: Los Angeles Federal Court PACER Records

Having reviewed the numerous documents filed by plaintiff {Laser Haas} over the course of the past seven months since this case was initiated, including four different versions of the massive and disjointed complaint, the Court concludes that the currently operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) must be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a), 9(b), and 12(b)(6) for the reasons stated in the motions to dismiss filed by defendants Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs.

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) All pending motions are suitable for determination without oral argument, and the hearings
previously scheduled for June 2, 2014, and June 9, 2014 are therefore VACATED.

(2) Plaintiff’s motions to amend the complaint {26, 67} and motion for reconsideration of the
order dismissing the MNAT defendants {77} are DENIED.

(3) Defendants motions to dismiss this case {59, 60, 61, 82} are GRANTED.

(4) The First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

(5) Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court {69} is DENIED AS MOOT.

(6) The Clerk shall close the case.

Read more: http://petters-fraud.com/clocked_di_96_judges_order_dismissing_case_haas_v_romney_may22_2014.pdf
[br][hr][br]


[br]

We have more than one-hundred felony violations by the named defendants in the "Haas v Romney" for civil Racketeering case. But that appears to be unimportant to any federal agent, agency and/or court even in this USAG Holder age of "No One is Too Big to Jail". (See HuffPo, Reuters and other articles {here} on United States Attorney General Eric Holder's remarks that the Department of Justice will pursue actions - no matter where it leads).

You can see the background of the case at our new website "Romney the Racketeer" for information about the particular case crimes. And our very detailed much years in the making (cause Romney's RICO gang has done much) "Petters-Fraud/DOJ_Cover_Up" web pages.

I started a petition at MoveOn.org, concerning USAG Holder's remarks (here); but there's a much more active item at MoveOn.org titled "Attorney General Holder: You Said no bank is 'too big to jail'. Prove It, starting with Wells Fargo".

Here's a story at Addicting Info titled: "Romney Slapped with Racketeering"

Also, here's the story from Ann Werner at Liberals United "Romney Sued for RICO".

Then there's Rmuse at PoliticusUSA.com who did nearly a dozen stories
(Ron is great with pictures, as is the CORE pic below).
Rmuse has many stories including "Meet the Man Battling Romney & Bain 12 years".

Don't worry any; because we're NOT giving up.



I'm going to sue Eric Holder on his empty promise.


-------------------------------------------------------------------


Just remember - it ain't over - until I quit!

But - for now - Romney is smiling and saying;





19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Chambers Order Dismiss Haas v Romney Racketeering Case! (Original Post) laserhaas May 2014 OP
Every lawyer on DU who chose to comment predicted this. former9thward May 2014 #1
Yes. Yes we did. Jberryhill's analysis has been stellar, funny, and dead on. nt msanthrope May 2014 #2
You don't tell the truth. I had an expert read them (Law firm Local Rules Compliance officer) laserhaas May 2014 #3
It's amazing how the people who were 100% correct are being labeled "bogus" Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #14
Correct in what? That a corrupt system would let white collar fraudster go 'Scot Free' laserhaas May 2014 #16
Got it. Jerrybill, misanthorpe and former9thward - all in concurence laserhaas May 2014 #4
I'm in with other attorneys. I, too, read the complaint and knew it would be dismissed. Shrike47 May 2014 #5
Add my vote to yours, JBerrhill's and Misanthrope's. nt COLGATE4 May 2014 #6
"four different versions of the massive and disjointed complaint" FSogol May 2014 #7
You couldn't stick with facts specific - if ye browned nostrals depended on it. laserhaas May 2014 #9
Laughably delusional. You Rock, Laser Tatiz. FSogol May 2014 #10
they deluded think because they kill the conversation laserhaas May 2014 #11
I understand that it is easy to join the mob and turn thumbs down to slay the fallen. laserhaas May 2014 #8
I'll simply have to indict them - one crime at a time. laserhaas May 2014 #12
You need to seek mental help from a licensed therapist JJChambers May 2014 #13
No joke. There's actually dead bodies around this guy's cohorts. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #15
we have the illusion of justice in America laserhaas May 2014 #17
Here's a smiley that demonstrates the anxiety of those who hate tyranny & corruption - prevailing laserhaas May 2014 #18
Here's the right ani-pic for those who worship fraudsters and enjoy bullying victims laserhaas May 2014 #19

former9thward

(32,016 posts)
1. Every lawyer on DU who chose to comment predicted this.
Sun May 25, 2014, 12:42 PM
May 2014

I know you think we are all corrupt and part of the conspiracy. But the legal papers were a jumble of nonsense and the court finally had enough. Your suit against Holder will have the same result. I have no idea if there is anything of merit in your case but if there was I suspect a competent lawyer would have taken it. Good luck.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
3. You don't tell the truth. I had an expert read them (Law firm Local Rules Compliance officer)
Sun May 25, 2014, 01:03 PM
May 2014

You are so bogus on so many levels of incongruity.

No 1. Several lawyers took my case on contingency; and then abandoned me - AFTER - opponents confessed Perjury.

In what realm of reality would you hold steadfast that there's no merits to confessions?

No. 2 United States Trustee made a Motion to Disgorge Paul Traub's TBF for $1.6 million and concluded deliberate fraud

In what realm of reality do you hold steadfast the UST is a conspiracy nut?

No. 3 There are many lawyers who speak to me and encourage me; because they know I have a case.

Including a current federal judge who educated me on 18 U.S.C. 3057(a) complaint I filed with Corruption Task Force.

No 4. My contracts guarantee legal fees (drafted by MNAT - who was my court ordered counsel)

Does the fact that I learned MNAT is both Romney & Goldman Sachs counsel mean anything to you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Here's my 2 best works to date (after receiving instruction on how to do better). If you would take the time to read them and then attempt to tell me (with a straight face) that it has no merit and makes no sense.

Then we should TALK about that....

http://petters-fraud.com/3rd_amended_complaint_v10.pdf

http://petters-fraud.com/plaintiff_may23_response_objection_to_goldmansachs_di_82_final_draft.pdf


[br][hr][br]

Finally, Paul Traub (who worked for Romney's Jumbo Sports and Stage Stores), was partners with Marc Dreier, Tom Petters and Okun 1031 Tax Group. Dreier doing 20 years, Petters doing 50 years and Okun doing 100.

Less than 25 feet away from me - during eToys works - sat Larry (Reservitz) Reynolds (who confessed laundering $12 billion dollars while living in Vegas, as partner of Petters and also in WISTEC {Witness Protection Program}).

The problem is not - whether or not - I have merits

It is that I've got TOO MUCH merits!

Against some of the most powerful persons and corporations on the planet.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
14. It's amazing how the people who were 100% correct are being labeled "bogus"
Mon May 26, 2014, 10:18 AM
May 2014

Perhaps your legal expert, isn't.

Keep us posted on your suit against Holder.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
16. Correct in what? That a corrupt system would let white collar fraudster go 'Scot Free'
Mon May 26, 2014, 11:40 AM
May 2014

And you think that is Kosher!

Instead of bogus?

And I'm the one you guys label off kilter!

Sheeeessshhhh......

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
9. You couldn't stick with facts specific - if ye browned nostrals depended on it.
Sun May 25, 2014, 05:11 PM
May 2014

That's okay.

always understood which side of the coin you were upon here.

Just wondering though;
how does it feel to help WSJ Robber Baron's

for free?

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
11. they deluded think because they kill the conversation
Sun May 25, 2014, 08:21 PM
May 2014

That everyone else doesnt see what is really going in here.

Good people simply are smart enough not to argue with stalwatrs hell bent to bully a victim and be on bended knee to Wall Street rogues

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
8. I understand that it is easy to join the mob and turn thumbs down to slay the fallen.
Sun May 25, 2014, 05:09 PM
May 2014

After all - someone has to go with the flow - so that guys like me stand out more.

Difference is - the facts are on my side;
and your beating me up for the fun of it.

While claiming to be brilliant legal professionals;
who are siding with a law firm that betrayed 3 clients thus far.

Looks real good for the resume (if such were to come out who ye are).

Good thing this forum is anonymous.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
12. I'll simply have to indict them - one crime at a time.
Mon May 26, 2014, 10:01 AM
May 2014

That's the only way to get the job done.
(so it would seem).

 

JJChambers

(1,115 posts)
13. You need to seek mental help from a licensed therapist
Mon May 26, 2014, 10:14 AM
May 2014

You're delusional. Seriously. This is not an attack on you; I am worried about you.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
15. No joke. There's actually dead bodies around this guy's cohorts.
Mon May 26, 2014, 10:20 AM
May 2014

Nothing nefarious but the delusional killing each other.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
17. we have the illusion of justice in America
Tue May 27, 2014, 08:41 AM
May 2014

Be that as it may great leaders instruct U.S.

That the truth is paramounat
And
Justice is an inalienable right.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Chambers Order Dismiss...