Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tea and oranges

(396 posts)
Sun May 25, 2014, 02:35 PM May 2014

"Endorsements Mean Something-- Sometimes They're A Warning From Malevolent Forces"

Howie at Down with Tyranny discusses what an endorsement from the DCCC (sometimes there might be a decent candidate), Blue Dogs or New Dems (wow, bupkis), or the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC:

On the other hand, when I see candidates supported by the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, essentially run by Raul Grijalva, Keith Ellison, Barbara Lee and Alan Grayson, I know they are values-oriented candidates running primarily to serve the interests of working families, not to debut for a future job as a lobbyist, the way the New Dems are doing. This week the Progressive Action PAC announced their first dozen endorsements of the cycle. Half are incumbents facing difficult reelections: Charlie Rangel, Hank Johnson, John Conyers, Mike Honda, Rick Nolan and Steve Cohen. The other 6 are progressive challengers:


See all the new challengers at: [link:http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/|
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Endorsements Mean S...