Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Wed May 28, 2014, 06:35 AM May 2014

Do Minorities Do Better Under Democrats?

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/05/democrats_are_good_for_minorities_minority_voters_are_making_a_rational.html


President Bill Clinton accepts the Thurgood Marshall Lifetime Achievement Award at an NAACP Legal Defense Fund event in New York City on Nov. 1, 2001.

***SNIP

Specifically, looking at data from 1948 to 2010, Hajnal and Horowitz found that “African Americans tend to experience substantial gains under Democratic presidents whereas they tend to incur significant losses or remain stagnant under Republicans.” On average, under Democratic presidents, blacks gained $895 in annual income, saw a 2.41 point drop in their poverty rate, and a 0.36 point drop in their unemployment rate. By contrast, under Republicans, blacks gained $142 a year, along with a 0.15 point increase in poverty and a 0.39 point increase in unemployment.

What’s more, this was true in relative terms as well. As they write, “[W]hether we look at the gap between blacks and whites or at the ratio of black to white outcomes, the patterns are essentially identical: Republican administrations were, on average, bad for African Americans and Democratic administrations were, on average, good for them, both in absolute and relative terms.”

The cumulative (i.e. year-after-year) differences are huge. Across 16 years of Democratic governance, the black poverty rate, for example, declined by nearly 40 points. Across 35 years of Republican governance, by contrast, it increased by 3 points. Indeed, during most years of Republican presidential leadership, black poverty grew and black unemployment increased.

Of course, this could all be a fluke—the statistical artifact of broad trends that go beyond presidential politics. It’s possible that Democrats had the good fortune of good economic times while Republicans governed during downturns and recessions. Or, alternatively, the findings could be affected by the influence of divided government and congressional action. As such, Hajnal and Horowitz ran another test that controlled for median income, inflation, changes in the economy, and control of Congress. In each case, the results were the same: “All else equal, black family incomes grew over $1,000 faster annually under Democratic leadership than they did under Republican presidents. Likewise, the black poverty rate declined 2.6 points faster under Democrats and the black unemployment rate fell almost one point faster.”
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do Minorities Do Better Under Democrats? (Original Post) xchrom May 2014 OP
We certainly don't do good under republicans thats for sure bigdarryl May 2014 #1
Only one group does well under republicans - THE RICH! liberal N proud May 2014 #2
Well, duh nt Lee-Lee May 2014 #3
Everyone does better under Democrats INCLUDING the rich! VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #4
Not this "Democratic" President. Sadly. KeepItReal May 2014 #5
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
4. Everyone does better under Democrats INCLUDING the rich!
Wed May 28, 2014, 08:17 AM
May 2014

My late Grandmother told me that....and she was a staunch FDR Democrat who actually voted for FDR and my grandfather was in the CCC's!

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
5. Not this "Democratic" President. Sadly.
Wed May 28, 2014, 08:23 AM
May 2014

1st term, Obama's economic policy was: save Wall Street at all costs and appease vanquished GOP by not going FDR on economic stimulus in the form of big infrastructure spending and helping out distressed homeowners.

In the face of the great recession, this government did the max to protect the financial institutions and reduce the deficit, but could not solidify unemployment insurance, spend more on infrastructure (which creates jobs), etc.

Even if Obama's economic theory today flipped to FDR (instead of Alan Greenspan Part 2), the Total Obstruction that is the GOP run House of Representatives would stymie any constructive change. The GOP doesn't want to see any positive economic news on President Obama's watch (I wonder when/if he ever realized this. Would be fascinating see his response.)

Obama didn't have to look out for Blacks specifically (he stated as much — which is ok - he is the President of all of us U.S. Americans), but a jobs bill would have helped EVERYONE.

Quantitative Easing as an economic stimulus ain't helping NOBODY, except the CEO of Bank of America.

On Edit: I shouldn't have to say the "Yes, Afican Americans do worse under the Republicans " because that truth is self evident. Fuck those guys.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do Minorities Do Better U...