General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion: If someone were to refer to President Obama as a "butchering hypocrite"....
....in the context of responding to an ordinary, run-of-the-mill presidential speech, what would be your reaction as a DUer?
And let's say the same person once referred to American liberals as "unprincipled fucktards."
Would you want such a person welcome on this board? (Not Discussionist, but DU).
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)You'd need to specify what sorts of deaths you're counting, and even then raw number is probably far from the whole story.
Compare deaths under Obama to under FDR, for example. By number alone, the latter is far more "butchery" than just about any other US president (except maybe Lincoln or Wilson, I guess, although I'm not sure).
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)we could have got japan to surrender by dropping an a-bomb in an unpopulated area.
The killing of innocents in an illegal war of aggression could count as butchery.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)Journeyman
(15,036 posts)before I could possibly give answer to such a speculative question.
But then, that'd be my reaction as a thinking adult.
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)You seem reluctant to give context here.
Is he talking about drone slaughters? Is he talking about lecturing other countries about behavior the US engages in with impunity?
I think you would be better off addressing the substance of the argument (if there is one) than trying to eliminate words you don't like.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)So what's your point?
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)"piece of shit used care salesman" and why one statement should be tolerated and supported and other should not?
Tough crowd here.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Might need to think about it for a bit
pampango
(24,692 posts)How about Bush or Assad or Gaddafi?
If someone is a pure pacifist and refers to any political leader in any country who uses the military a "butchering hypocrite" that would be acceptable to me. If, OTOH, they used the term on Obama, but not on Assad, Bush or FDR, then they are not a pacifist. That would be a symptom of ODS or perhaps just political opportunism.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)or just life in general?
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)ancianita
(36,109 posts)I suppose the context of those words matters...
But I want to read -- and hopefully offer -- progressive ideas and practical solutions to the party's and country's problems.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)And before commenting, I have never heard of the phrase "butchering hypocrite". Is there any historical significance to that phrase or is it just what the individual decided to type at that moment?
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)Just curious how someone's off-DU statements might jive with on-DU perceptions.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)It should be "enough is enough" time for that crew.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)But it's nice to know the Third Way isn't even pretending to be liberal, or to have anything but contempt for actual liberals, anymore.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)is wing-nuttery. You Better Believe it!
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)War is Peace.
Freedom is Surveillance.
Liberal is wing-nuttery.
The first time a Third Way poster here accused me of being a "Right Winger" because I posted an article criticizing Obama for continuing BUSH policies, I nearly passed out from laughing.
What a sad, desperate joke that schtick has become.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I hope you realize that this isn't just a game. You are choosing the wrong side of history. The Democratic Party can't work for the people when there is active defense of its infiltration by corporatists pushing the same policies as Republicans.
I could not participate in that sort of marketing, or repetition of marketing, for policies are destroying a democratic government and pushing millions into poverty and despair. My conscience would not allow it.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)but as we all know now, nearly all Liberal authors, journalists, web sites are considered 'wing nuttery' by the Third Way.
They are and always were considered the same thing by the Right and still are. That is enough to give them the credibility they have earned in this Liberal's opinion.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)vile, hateful Russian ethnonationalist who hates the US but poses as a progressive USer.
The kind of person who gets their news from Russia Today as the Cliven Bundy crowd gets their news from Hannity.
FSogol
(45,491 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)some well meaning and reasonable people, and then there are the ideologically-driven partisans, only they're partisan against the 99% of the country who don't share their views
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)rt.com spews out and generally hates the United States.
This site would definitely be better off without such a person.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)abakan
(1,819 posts)Post it and see what you get....Otherwise it's unsubstantiated hearsay and of little value to anyone but you.