Are Human Rights Activists Today's Warmongers?

[newthinking]

Published on Wednesday, May 28, 2014 by The Boston Globe
Are Human Rights Activists Today's Warmongers?
by Stephen Kinzer

Almost everyone likes the idea of human rights. The phrase itself is freighted with goodness. Supporting human rights is like supporting world peace.


Samantha Power testifies at her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Wednesday, July 17, 2013. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

The modern human rights movement began as a band of outsiders, fighting governments on behalf of the faceless and voiceless. President Jimmy Carter brought it into the American foreign policy establishment by naming an outspoken assistant secretary of state for human rights. This meant that concern for the poor, the brutalized, and the imprisoned would be heard in the highest councils of government.

Now, several decades after the human rights movement traded its outsider status for influence in Washington, it is clear that this has produced negative as well as positive results. The movement has become a global behemoth. Sometimes it functions as a handmaiden to the power it was once dedicated to combating.

The most appalling result of this process in the United States is that some human rights activists now regularly call for using force to resolve the world’s problems. At one time, “human rights” implied opposition to war. Now some of the most outspoken warmongers in Washington are self-proclaimed human rights advocates.

Continued: https://www.commondreams.org/view/2014/05/28

[GeorgeGist]

1. The US fought a Civil War for human rights.

[Donald Ian Rankin]

2. A silly and one-sided article. Sometimes going to war really is the lesser evil. N.T.