General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton won't run for President.
Articles like the one linked to here are just the beginning of the kind of scrutiny Hillary would have to endure if she seeks the presidential nomination of the Democratic Party.
And this kind of discussion will make her success in primaries highly problematic. After the 'Crash of 2008' and the emergence of 'wealth inequality' as a major issue, Mrs. Clinton is simply not able to be the advocate for the stressed and beleaguered working and middle classes.
I don't think Hillary will want to risk becoming a two-time presidential nominee candidate loser.
***
How Did the Clintons Become So Rich?
The real scandal is not that the former president and first lady are so wealthy, but how they got that wealthy.
By Zaid Jilani - Al Jazeera / Alternet.org
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Never can be sure, of course.
spanone
(135,841 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Ok.
awake
(3,226 posts)The republicans want us to focus on 2016 instead of this years election so they can keep control of the House and try to get control of the Senate. Do not get distracted by 2016 while we still have work to do this year!!!
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)If they can take over the Senate, being president will be terrible for any Democrat. Not to mention all the state governments--we need to make gains where we are outnumbered and solidify majorities where we have them.
randome
(34,845 posts)Like her or not (I don't), she will likely be our next President. Just because you feel strongly about an issue doesn't mean the vast electorate will disdain her.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]A ton of bricks, a ton of feathers, it's still gonna hurt.[/center][/font][hr]
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)for making a decision about running. She knows full well that there's not going to be any coronation. You are incorrect in your assessment, in my opinion.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)She is a dicey campaigner who is extraordinarily well connected and super resourced who is working to set up conditions that will make sure there are only "vanity" and "getting to know you" campaigns in a phony primary.
MineralMan
(146,317 posts)Then we have the primaries. That's going to happen down the road. In the meantime, we have mid-term elections.
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)interrupting your unblinking focus on the midterms.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)If Hillary wants to run, she will run. If she runs, she will be very, very difficult to defeat in the primaries.
If you'd prefer someone else, you might want to consider posting things that are favorable to that person, rather than repeating attacks on Hillary Clinton. That's my suggestion to you.
BeyondGeography
(39,374 posts)That's the way the Clintons will see it, and they can be forgiven for trusting their political instincts on this point. In fact, they probably see it as a positive, since the money focus is getting hot-and-heavy early in the game. Last time. Bill's $110 million post-presidential haul came out in 2008. Now she isn't even running and they have a chance to mend their rhetorical stumbles (there have been a couple) out of the way and get their story straight. It won't be difficult.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Thanks for letting me know
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)to "scrutiny" and they cannot endure it? LOL. Were you around in the 1990's?
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)while their were seven million fake ass scandals and focus on bullshit that had nothing to do with official business.
There wasn't near enough scrutiny on NAFTA, deregulation, welfare deform, GATT, most favored nation status for China, or media consolidation just silly buggers going on about real estate deals, blowjobs, who Bubba fucked in Arkansas, how often Bubba ate a Big Mac, Chelsea's appearance, and if Hillary was a ballbuster - aka reality TV shot ahead of it's time and little to nothing about selling us out justified by a couple of soon to burst bubbles and trickle down sold with more high minded sounding rhetoric.
LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)It's as if I woke up in 1992!
TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)She and Bill and been through and withstood much worse scandal mongering.
reddread
(6,896 posts)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
lets not hold out hope for phantoms like common sense or dignity.
we are talking about top echelon money whores.