General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama on Alito during his confirmation.
"But when you look at his record - when it comes to his understanding of the Constitution, I have found that in almost every case, he consistently sides on behalf of the powerful against the powerless; on behalf of a strong government or corporation against upholding American's individual rights.
If there is a case involving an employer and an employee and the Supreme Court has not given clear direction, he'll rule in favor of the employer. If there's a claim between prosecutors and defendants, if the Supreme Court has not provided a clear rule of decision, then he'll rule in favor of the state. He's rejected countless claims of employer discrimination, even refusing to give some plaintiffs a hearing for their case. He's refused to hold corporations accountable numerous times for dumping toxic chemicals into water supplies, even against the decisions of the EPA. He's overturned a jury verdict that found a company liable for being a monopoly when it had over 90% of the market share at the time.
It's not just his decisions in these individual cases that give me pause - it's that decisions like these are the rule for Samuel Alito, not the exception."
Sound like he was right about this asshole.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)At the conclusion of the confirmation hearings, January 12, the threat of a filibuster appeared to grow more remote as Durbin called a filibuster attempt "unlikely". Judiciary Committee member Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said, "I do not see a likelihood of a filibuster. This might be a man I disagree with, but it doesn't mean he shouldn't be on the court."[13] She changed her position on January 27, saying that she would vote no for cloture.[3] Fellow Judiciary Committee member Joe Biden (D-DE) said, "I think he is going to be confirmed." Other Democrats such as Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Daniel Akaka (D-HI), and Byron Dorgan (D-ND), however, said they would not support a filibuster, though they all voted against confirmation.[14][15] In addition, Senators Mark Pryor (D-AR), Kent Conrad (D-ND), and Joe Biden (D-DE) indicated that they did not support a filibuster.[4][5] Later, however, Joe Biden announced on the 29th that he would vote no for cloture.
On January 26, while vacationing in Switzerland, Senator John Kerry (D-MA) called for a filibuster to block Alito's nomination.[16] Despite the support of his fellow Massachusetts Senator, Ted Kennedy (D-MA), Senator Hillary Clinton (D-NY)[6][7][8] and Harry Reid (D-NV), the top Democrat in the Senate, other Democrats were afraid the measure would backfire and were cautious to support it. Just one day after Kerry's call for a filibuster, Reid further stated that the Democrats did not have the votes needed to sustain a filibuster to block the confirmation of Alito. "We're going to have a vote Tuesday morning," Reid said. "Everyone knows there are not enough votes to support a filibuster."[17][18]
The Democratic Senators from Massachusetts, John Kerry and Ted Kennedy, attempted to gain support for a filibuster of the nominee, however they gained little support even within their own party. The Senate voted for cloture on the nomination 72-25. Three senators didn't vote, including Democrat Tom Harkin and Republican John Ensign, who had been injured in a car accident earlier that day. All of the members of the Gang of Fourteen voted for cloture with the majority.
Senators who voted for a filibuster[9]
Evan Bayh (D-IN)
Joe Biden (D-DE)
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY)
Mark Dayton (D-MN)
Chris Dodd (D-CT)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Russ Feingold (D-WI)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Jim Jeffords (I-VT)
Ted Kennedy (D-MA)
John Kerry (D-MA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Patrick Leahy (D-VT)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Bob Menendez (D-NJ)
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Barack Obama (D-IL)
Jack Reed (D-RI)
Harry Reid (D-NV)
Paul Sarbanes (D-MD)
Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
Debbie Stabenow (D-MI)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Full Senate
The Senate voted 58-42 on Tuesday, January 31, to confirm Alito as the 110th Justice of the Supreme Court. All but one of the 55 Senate Republicans voted to confirm Alito, as well as four Democrats: Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE), Senator Robert Byrd (D-WV), Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD), and Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND). Forty-two Senators voted against Alito's confirmation (40 Democrats, Lincoln Chafee (R-RI), and Jim Jeffords (I-VT)).[10]
from wikipedia
corkhead
(6,119 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)pretend they "might" filibuster Alito.
Meanwhile, Republicans would filibuster a birthday card to their own mother's if Obama proposed it.
dsc
(52,162 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Don't know, just speculating.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)sacrificing "moderates" republicans would shoot down, then nominating someone further left instead as Bush did to the right when he put up Scalito after Myers withdrew.
mopinko
(70,112 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)who they are hoping will hire them too.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)riqster
(13,986 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)What he forgot was that he did not have to lead one, all he had to do was to put his force behind Kerry and Kennedy. Instead, people alligned with him, mocked Kerry for "leading from the Alps". He was attending Davos and speaking on foreign relations. He returned early to give an incredibly compelling speech on the floor of the Senate -- followed by another the day of the vote.
Both Kerry and Kennedy actually enlisted support here and on Daily Kos - the first time I saw major politicians do so.
MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)at wrote to Feinstein asking her to vote no on the confirmation (and again later when she voted yes).
Her basic answer each time was "Back off, Sonny! I'm a Senator and know more than you do."
I'm glad to now live in a state with two real Democratic Senators.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)and only four Democrats voted for him and she wasn't one of them
PMcDee
(43 posts)and I wrote a letter to Senator Feinstein at the time thanking her for her vote in favor of the filibuster and her NO vote on Alito's confirmation.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)So would Hillary. A lot has changed.
redqueen
(115,103 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Mr. Obama's words have proven true.
What does it take to impeach a Supreme? My pet project is Justice Thomas. We could put him in the hot seat for his indiscretions, let him try to defend his recorded comments, actions and biased decisions which disqualify him for this high office. Just a thought for 2015
warrant46
(2,205 posts)Climb the mountain.. (just saying)
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)warrant46
(2,205 posts)I never said you were ------the Nomination was a disgrace
http://www.nytimes.com/1991/10/16/us/thomas-confirmation-senate-confirms-thomas-52-48-ending-week-bitter-battle-time.html
I was pointing out that Biden who chaired the Judiciary committee allowed this pervert to move on to the DEMOCRATICALLY controlled Senate who anointed this scum.
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)of the senate.
so yeah.. that wont be happening anytime soon.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)Someone who is so brazenly partisan and so brazenly lazy and off put by actually having to do his job ...
If not in actuality, there would be WIDESPREAD talk in this country of impeaching him ...
fasttense
(17,301 posts)"Thomas routinely checked a box titled "none" on his annual financial disclosure forms, indicating that his wife had received no income. But in reality, the letter states, she earned nearly $700,000 from the Heritage Foundation from 2003 to 2007 alone.He failed for decades to report."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/29/democratic-lawmakers-call-for-investiation-into-clarence-thomas-finances_n_987934.html
He violated the law, lied about it and pretended he didn't understand the form. He should be prosecuted and impeached.
indepat
(20,899 posts)character of those individuals.
Kablooie
(18,634 posts)hawaii73
(13 posts)All one has to do is look at how the voting went by the Senate. With no Republican objecting to his nomination it should be an indication of what kind of Justice he would be. I am sick of the whole Supreme Court thing. I lean liberal, but people like Alito, Thomas, Scalia and Roberts are never ever going to side with the little guy. I've said it before and I'll say it again, when you have Clarence Thomas' wife working hand-in-hand with groups trying to get rid of Pres. Obama's healthcare plan, you know he'd never vote in favor of anything and would do all he could at every chance to undermine it. The SCOTUS if a joke!
Cosmocat
(14,564 posts)and it has become the failsafe last resort that republicans have been trying to make it since the late 80s/early 90s ...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Now that he is on the SCOTUS, he is proving that even when the SCOTUS has given clear direction through precedent, Alito is proving that
Moostache
(9,895 posts)12 years would put them beyond the usual electoral politics of the House and the Presidency and would cover 2 Senatorial terms as well. The founders did not envision an activist, ideologue bench rewriting the law as they see politically palpable; they intended the exact opposite of what we have perverted the SCOTUS into...
I remember the Supreme Court becoming a tit-for-tat circus around the time of the Bork nomination attempt and ever since then it has seemed to become more and more politicized every year.
calimary
(81,297 posts)Glad you're here! Interesting finding. Sounds like he WAS right about this asshole. Good find! Thanks for posting here - especially for the benefit of some out there who tend to want to jump down President Obama's throat every hour on the hour and kick his ass from here to next week because he's less than absolutely perfect.
lark
(23,102 posts)A pox on the head of any so-called Dem who voted to confim his nomination.
Bickle
(109 posts)Sniff out his criminal behavior, his taking if bribes, I'm sure he's got pile of them just like Scalia and Thimas
impeach, arrest, try, lots of jail time
No future nominees who are not liberal atheists. And definitely no more Catholics. Here's a hint. Those beholden to a foreign power they delusionaliy believe decides if they will be tormented for.all of eternity should not be making choices that said man in. A dress has opinions on
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)control of the House and the Senate.
Let's get Democrats into the House and Senate.
The birth rate in the US is 1.8 per woman. That means that most American women use some form of birth control, and there should be no exceptions to requiring that insurance companies insure every American for birth control.
After all, every American is insured for vaginal, uterine, breast and ovarian cancer as well as prostrate cancer. Insurance covers erectile dysfunction. Why shouldn't it cover birth control?
What is so wrong about birth control? Women having sex because they want to? Why is that wrong? We need to talk about this because you can hardly watch TV without sexual innuendo.
What world does this Hobby Lobby guy live in? Certainly isn't the same world I live in.
Puglover
(16,380 posts)you can see the snake in his eyes. Alito has always given me the shudders.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)DFW
(54,397 posts)I don't think any of them had any illusions, but Alito was EXACTLY what Cheney and Rove wanted, and was everything Obama was against.
Note, after all, who it was at the SOTU speech mouthing "That's not true" when Obama made a comment about a SCOTUS decision. Of course what Obama said WAS true, but Alito says and does what his benefactors want and rules as his benefactors wish.
Woe betide you if you are wrongly accused of anything as an individual, or have a legitimate complaint against the state or a powerful wealthy entity. For while Samuel Alito has never met a corporation he didn't like, he has rarely met an individual that he did like.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)something or other. I can't remember. I'm sure it was pretty damn important to not block this jackhole's appointment.
supercats
(429 posts)He needs to be removed "somehow"...
Strat0
(34 posts)somehow I doubt Obama will appear as prescient in the next paragraph of this speech.
When it comes to how checks and balances in our system are supposed to operate - the balance of power between the Executive Branch, Congress, and the Judiciary, Judge Alito consistently sides with the notion that a President should not be constrained by either Congressional acts or the check of the Judiciary. He believes in the overarching power of the President to engage in whatever the President deems to be appropriate policy. As a consequence of this, I'm extraordinarily worried about how Judge Alito might approach issues like wiretapping, monitoring of emails, or other privacy concerns that we've seen surface over the last several months.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)red dog 1
(27,816 posts)President Obama should speak out like this more often.
IMO. Alito and Clarence Thomas should both be impeached!
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)TacoD
(581 posts)OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Alito would "roll back decades of progress and roll over when confronted with an administration too willing to flaunt the rules and looking for a rubber stamp."
Cha
(297,272 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)Thanks for the thread, LexVegas.
EEO
(1,620 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)See Iraq. See Alito. See Syria.
If only we could have a hundred Obamas in the Senate...
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)There is no love loss between those two. I'd pay big buck to be a fly on the wall listening to the two of them talk.