General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere Are No More Honest Conservatives, So Stop Looking For One
Source: The Nation
The mainstream and liberal presss quixotic search for a good conservative merely reinforces the soft bigotry of low expectations.
Last November I received a friendly request from an editor at a political publication. A liberal himself, surrounded by liberal colleagues, he wanted to make sure that the journalists he was hiring were not drawn exclusively from the left. He wondered if I might help him out with a list of conservative reporters, writers and commentators whom I admired most. Who on the right does the best job of covering politics or the economy or anything else, for that matter, in a thoughtful, fair and accurate way?
Maybe if I had a time machine and could travel back to the 1970s or 1980s, I could name names. Now, though, I cant think of a single one.
Sure, the right in previous decades was jam-packed with the same sorts of haters, hustlers, hacks and conspiratorial lunatics that are familiar to us now. But there were lively exceptions. George Nash, a still-active independent historian, celebrated The Conservative Intellectual Tradition in America in a classic book published in 1976, when that tradition was very much still alive and kicking. James J. Kilpatrick, editor of the Richmond News Leader, may have been an intellectual architect of the Souths massive resistance against integration in the 1950s, but he also wrote columns that were literary, politically independent and often wise. Kevin Phillips was an idiosyncratic conservative then who wrote brilliantly prescient articles with the same critical acumen and empirical ruthlessness he demonstrates nowadays as an idiosyncratic liberal. He published a piece in Harpers in 1973 predicting that the Republican Party would cement its coalition by creating a new managerial and communications establishment that merchandises the values that Middle Americans hold dear and that the liberal establishment of the Sixties will begin to wither. A liberal columnist responded by calling Phillipss argument the most ludicrous political analysis of our time. Knee-jerk inanities like that were one of the reasons it was so important to read conservatives back in 1973.
George Will, National Reviews Washington editor, won his Washington Post column that same year as part of a wave of contributors that evinced the success of an organized and underhanded campaign in the Nixon White House to scare mainstream (liberal) publications into hiring conservatives. From that privileged perch, however, he proved positively scathing as a principled critic of a White House that, during 1972, both believed virtually every possible Democratic candidate was a garish sham who would destroy the country but that they couldnt trust the American people to choose that way in a fair fight. Thus they ended up destroying themselves via Watergateand that theres solid thinking.
Read more: http://www.thenation.com/article/180049/there-are-no-more-honest-conservatives-so-stop-looking-one
Zambero
(8,964 posts)For the American right, it's all about creating false perceptions that are potent enough to obscure facts in the real world. This is where a separation from mere politics takes place and is replaced by a cult that readily identifies with false equivalencies, a them vs. us mentality, and absolutism that is devoid of any nuance or possibility of finding middle ground. Heck, when the 1% philosophical difference between Tea Party and "Establishment" becomes a basis for ideological warfare, one senses that these people are beyond help.