Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:37 PM Jul 2014

I am hysterical AND my hair is on fire --

Yes, us wimmen folk just over react.

ALL BIRTH CONTROL. ALL. OF. IT.


"The Supreme Court on Tuesday confirmed that its decision a day earlier extending religious rights to closely held corporations applies broadly to the contraceptive coverage requirement in the new health care law, not just the handful of methods the justices considered in their ruling.

The justices did not comment in leaving in place lower court rulings in favor of businesses that object to covering all 20 methods of government-approved contraception.

Oklahoma-based Hobby Lobby Inc. and a Pennsylvania furniture maker won their court challenges Monday in which they refused to pay for two emergency contraceptive pills and two intrauterine devices.

Tuesday's orders apply to companies owned by Catholics who oppose all contraception. Cases involving Colorado-based Hercules Industries Inc., Illinois-based Korte & Luitjohan Contractors Inc. and Indiana-based Grote Industries Inc. were awaiting action pending resolution of the Hobby Lobby case."


http://news.yahoo.com/justices-act-other-health-law-mandate-cases-133633160--politics.html;_ylt=A0LEV0_Jw7JTfGsAwEJXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTB0aTRxYjk3BHNlYwNzYwRjb2xvA2JmMQR2dGlkA1ZJUDQ2NF8x

50 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am hysterical AND my hair is on fire -- (Original Post) Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2014 OP
Terrifying Rider3 Jul 2014 #1
I hope that those who might have been on the fence boston bean Jul 2014 #2
+1. Add to that the vastly, wilfully, ignorant. nt Hekate Jul 2014 #8
And the corollary to that, boston bean, is - I hope that those who might have been calimary Jul 2014 #25
Hear, hear! genwah Jul 2014 #42
Exactly calimary sheshe2 Jul 2014 #50
Check out my signature line. Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2014 #44
Too bad there's no ACA provision to address this bullshit leftstreet Jul 2014 #3
Actually, the ACA laid out very specifically what insurance needed to contain passiveporcupine Jul 2014 #39
That Guy Fawkes mask of yours Jackpine Radical Jul 2014 #4
i hope not.. iamthebandfanman Jul 2014 #29
The police would open fire in about 2 seconds... Moostache Jul 2014 #32
And that sort of brutality iamthebandfanman Jul 2014 #41
Yes, and it's not that we don't know that that's always a possibility. Here in San Francisco genwah Jul 2014 #43
Why does everyone have to take things so literally? Jackpine Radical Jul 2014 #34
Truth! Thank you Jackpine Radical! LiberalLoner Jul 2014 #35
Everyone upset by this ruling (90+%) need to start pressuring your lawmakers for single payer DJ13 Jul 2014 #5
Yup. Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2014 #6
And VOTE!!!!! calimary Jul 2014 #26
... but, but, but it's just a "woman's" issue (sarcasm) etherealtruth Jul 2014 #7
"The rights of women vs. the rights of people," the "justice" said n/t catrose Jul 2014 #10
Truly mind numbing etherealtruth Jul 2014 #11
I wish I could recommend this twice nilram Jul 2014 #9
Why is health care for women so threatening? littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #12
Don't you know women have abortions as a hobby? Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #20
I wish I could have a littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #22
...try these.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2014 #30
ZOmg! They would make the bitchin' est best littlemissmartypants Jul 2014 #31
I firmly believe albino65 Jul 2014 #13
Me too,,, KarenS Jul 2014 #14
This is no time for hysterics. Trust Buster Jul 2014 #15
What do you suggest? Phentex Jul 2014 #16
Doing nothing, I guess. Because he/she evidently doesn't give a flying fuck. n/t nomorenomore08 Jul 2014 #19
fuckin NPR had comments from a GUY with the libertarian Cato Institute. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2014 #17
Here's a fun fact Clyde Tenson Jul 2014 #18
Welcome to DU, Clyde Tenson! calimary Jul 2014 #28
today, another day later, hopemountain Jul 2014 #21
My knickers are twisted and I have the vapors over this. Gormy Cuss Jul 2014 #23
It's really hard to type ohheckyeah Jul 2014 #24
I posted the SCOTUS picture on Facebook tavernier Jul 2014 #27
I think there are a lot of folks out there TBF Jul 2014 #33
The thing is they are picking the sisters because they think they can get away with it nolabels Jul 2014 #40
This is really important - TBF Jul 2014 #47
Yeah we're mad, get over it gwheezie Jul 2014 #36
+ a billion. LiberalLoner Jul 2014 #37
FOX News saiz, this is a win for women... Helen Borg Jul 2014 #38
Me too cally Jul 2014 #45
Notice it's men who are calling "hair on fire".. smh. Really? 'cause that's who Cha Jul 2014 #46
^^^^ THIS ^^^^ nt TBF Jul 2014 #48
I know whose hair I'd LIKE to see on fire..... Lifelong Protester Jul 2014 #49

boston bean

(36,221 posts)
2. I hope that those who might have been on the fence
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:40 PM
Jul 2014

as to whether there are misogynists and sexists posting here on DU, are now off the fence.

We have them posting amongst us and they post the most offensive comments and anti-women opinions.

If yesterday and today were not enough evidence for you, I don't know what to tell you.

calimary

(81,304 posts)
25. And the corollary to that, boston bean, is - I hope that those who might have been
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:27 PM
Jul 2014

on the fence about VOTING this fall - as in

"Meh, both parties the same."

"There's no difference between the parties..."

"They're all corporate so what's the point..."

"They're all the same..."

"Makes no difference... both sides-both sides-both sides (BRAAAAKKKK! Polly Wanna Cracker!!! AWWWWWKKKK!!!)"

If yesterday and today were not enough evidence for you, I don't know what to tell you.

sheshe2

(83,785 posts)
50. Exactly calimary
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:46 AM
Jul 2014

The fence has collapsed. There is no place left to sit. They need to decide now.

Vote or don't. Make your decision wisely.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
44. Check out my signature line.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:12 PM
Jul 2014

The "uppity woman" was in response to posters right here.

I am very familiar with that particular breed here.

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
3. Too bad there's no ACA provision to address this bullshit
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:40 PM
Jul 2014

The ACA makes sure you can't qualify for the exchanges if your employer offers coverage within a % of your income.

But no provision if your employer offers shit insurance

What a corporate clusterfuck

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
39. Actually, the ACA laid out very specifically what insurance needed to contain
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:29 PM
Jul 2014

The fact that the supreme court has now rendered that law obsolete for religious reasons, should also render the whole "mandatory" part of the ACA obsolete. If you are required to buy insurance, and there are specific things that insurance needs to provide, then, taking away some of those provisions should also obsolete the mandatory nature of that coverage. Basically, what should happen, is that in cases like this, the employee should be able to sign up for an
ACA exchange, rather than be committed to using employer provided coverage.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. That Guy Fawkes mask of yours
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:43 PM
Jul 2014

is going to come in handy one of these days.

I'm digging mine out too.

Ya gotta wonder just how long they have left before the general public just stands up, yells out in unison "We've fuckin' had it!" and starts tearing things down the system with their bare hands.

The oligarchs think they can get away with anything.

Well, the French aristocracy never saw it coming either.

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
29. i hope not..
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:34 PM
Jul 2014

hiding behind masks is so passé :p


people shouldnt be afraid to stand up for what they believe in.. showing your face is much more powerful than that mask...

so instead of people handing out guy fawkes masks (a failed terrorist)..

people should be handing out GAS MASKS to protect them from the chemical warfare that police engage in these days...

can you imagine the shock on police officers faces when everyone on the front lines whips out their gas masks and continues to move forward?

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
32. The police would open fire in about 2 seconds...
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jul 2014

The paramilitary forces that we currently call "police" bear no resemblance to what most of us grew up recognizing as police officers. They are dominated by way too many trigger happy douchebags to think that a protest of people carrying gas masks would NOT be fired upon...

It would make Kent State look like a scratch by comparison to the carnage they would unleash now. And I guarantee the media coverage would slant waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay to the ->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

iamthebandfanman

(8,127 posts)
41. And that sort of brutality
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:39 PM
Jul 2014

almost always invokes change..

if you look back at all the major labour struggles from the 1900s until the 1940s (and then the civil rights movement later)..
youll notice that people got hurt..

that doesn't mean that we have to be the aggressors or the attackers (and lord knows im not advocating that)..
but some folks on our side have to be willing to be injured (and possibly killed) for the causes they believe in..
if not, we'll never get the change we want and NEED....

I dunno if you had noticed, but weve tried this 'get sprayed in the face and taken to jail' tactic for the last 25-30 years.. hasn't really been working out for anyone (except the police getting lots of money thru fines)..

genwah

(574 posts)
43. Yes, and it's not that we don't know that that's always a possibility. Here in San Francisco
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:04 PM
Jul 2014

not so great of a possibility. But every action is different, every city and town present their own unique personalities. I remember a story from Dick Gregory's autobiography. [not a quote; what I remember. Mr. Gregory is in jail after being arrested at a protest] '..and there was this kid, and I asked him how old he was. He said "seven". I asked him if he knew why he was in jail> He said "Teedom". Ain't that something. A seven year old kid in jail for a word he doesn't know how to say."

I can easily see, soon, needing a new gas mask. I can't buy replacement filters for my old one. Do gas masks even need filters now? Did something new happen besides pepper spray?

When we're out, we may be out for "teedom", we may not understand the ramifications of confronting your 'trigger happy douchebags', we may not be pledging, "our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor", but here's the thing. We're out there.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
34. Why does everyone have to take things so literally?
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:07 PM
Jul 2014

The fact is that the continuation of the oligarchy is dependent on the acquiescence of the downtrodden. There are many ways to bring a system down, and they all come to the surface when the cost of acquiescence becomes greater than the cost of noncompliance.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
5. Everyone upset by this ruling (90+%) need to start pressuring your lawmakers for single payer
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:49 PM
Jul 2014

Removing employers from healthcare is the only way to stop this.

calimary

(81,304 posts)
26. And VOTE!!!!!
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:28 PM
Jul 2014

Get your ass to the polls in November! If you don't, we all have YOU to blame, you know.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
7. ... but, but, but it's just a "woman's" issue (sarcasm)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 04:52 PM
Jul 2014

(It is a human issue, but that is beside the point) ... this ruling has the potential to reach far beyond birth control (and the limits placed on birth control coverage are horrid enough) ... Scientologists are fervent in their belief that psychiatry (and all psychiatric medications) is unfounded and a great evil, Jehova's Witnesses have prohibitions against blood transfusions ... right wing nut job Christians are against all sex outside of marriage ... should they be able to prohibit coverage for STDs (our high court seems to think they just might have that right).

nilram

(2,888 posts)
9. I wish I could recommend this twice
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:18 PM
Jul 2014

Even though, as a software guy, I stand to profit from the machinations the insurance industry has to take as they develop policies, rates, & enrollment procedures for each of the coverage combinations of the 20 different methods of contraception. That's 20! policies, 2,432,902,008,176,640,000 combinations -- though, I suppose in practice it'll reduce down to an either/or value.

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
12. Why is health care for women so threatening?
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jul 2014

Thankfully this time they have screwed themselves into a corner.

Love, Peace and Shelter. littlemissmartypants

littlemissmartypants

(22,691 posts)
31. ZOmg! They would make the bitchin' est best
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:44 PM
Jul 2014

MARDI GRAS CAKE BABIES! LMAO!
Where is the laugh till you cry smilie???

 

albino65

(484 posts)
13. I firmly believe
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:43 PM
Jul 2014

that there are a lot of women, both conservative and liberal, who use contraceptives for both birth control and other medical reasons that are married to conservative men. They should cut them off now!

KarenS

(4,079 posts)
14. Me too,,,
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 05:50 PM
Jul 2014

I have been and remain outraged over this.

I cannot shake it and I don't even want to shake it.

Hysterical and hair on fire ~ absolutely!

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
17. fuckin NPR had comments from a GUY with the libertarian Cato Institute.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:16 PM
Jul 2014

He sounded quite calm. According to him, this is not actually a very big deal, sounds more worrisome than it is. The government will simply offer non-employer-dependent coverage for women's special health needs.
So simple. (I thought libertarians were against gov't involvement.... but I guess he's not worried. Wonder how many women work at Cato, other than clerical "assistants" and "sanitation specialists" ?)

I trust PBO to work towards that. I don't trust the congresspukes to allow it.

calimary

(81,304 posts)
28. Welcome to DU, Clyde Tenson!
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:32 PM
Jul 2014

Glad you're here! Well, THIS woman is Catholic, and about as pro-choice as it's possible for one human to be. They can be whatever religion they want to be, but this is not a theocracy, much as they try to forget. And I am not interested in some sort of Catholic or "Judeo-Christian" Sharia law being imposed, especially by a bunch of old men. They neither speak for me nor represent me.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
23. My knickers are twisted and I have the vapors over this.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:25 PM
Jul 2014

Last edited Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:23 PM - Edit history (1)

It's amazing to me how many are trying to downplay the significance of this ruling in spite of the wall-to-wall coverage of Ginsburg's strongly worded dissent.

TBF

(32,062 posts)
33. I think there are a lot of folks out there
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:53 PM
Jul 2014

who are going to realize they'd better pay attention when

(a) a one-night stand turns into a pregnancy they have no interest in supporting - but we've got great DNA technology now so support it they will (whether they are single or married to someone else etc)

(b) not to mention women who are otherwise "conservative" realize they've screwed themselves over when they can't get a BC prescription even for medical reasons (cramping etc)

(c) people in general start realizing they are not all members of the Catholic Church and maybe do not share those same extreme views ...

the list is endless really. This was a really really bad decision on the part of 5 old bigoted white men.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
40. The thing is they are picking the sisters because they think they can get away with it
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:36 PM
Jul 2014

Oh Yea, all the outrage is more than warranted but i do see something that might be worse if they do get away with it. It's the idea they can rule anyway they want at anytime and nobody or any kind of group will be able to do anything about it. They have pretty much done that before and of late, but now seems like a kind of throw away with nothing to really lose except a small amount of positioning for them.

The payoff is great but the amount they gamble is small, just like a bunch of crooked stock brokers

It's a ruling that says business's needs are more important than the individuals and the only reasoning the business has to give is that is what the business has decided.

TBF

(32,062 posts)
47. This is really important -
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:59 PM
Jul 2014

" It's the idea they can rule anyway they want at anytime and nobody or any kind of group will be able to do anything about it." - I think you are right that they feel like they can just do whatever they want and get away with it. So far they have. I wonder what it will take to get people mad enough to fight back.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
36. Yeah we're mad, get over it
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:11 PM
Jul 2014

Why is someone who is not angry explaining why we're angry? Why is someone trying to spin this to somehow this is because of Obama?
Now we have people explaining our anger and it's too much anger. Apparently there's some fucking anger meter that is acceptable. Well get over it. This is just getting started.

Helen Borg

(3,963 posts)
38. FOX News saiz, this is a win for women...
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:26 PM
Jul 2014

'Cuz now the employer is not involved in women's business. In other words, now you are free to buy your own birth control pills. Ain't that progress?

cally

(21,594 posts)
45. Me too
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:29 PM
Jul 2014

I am infuriated and worried. I don't understand how any woman or moderate votes for the crazies.

How are you? Good to know you are still around.

Cha

(297,275 posts)
46. Notice it's men who are calling "hair on fire".. smh. Really? 'cause that's who
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:33 PM
Jul 2014

Undermined our Choices in the first place..


Gratefully there are many men who do understand

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
49. I know whose hair I'd LIKE to see on fire.....
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 11:48 PM
Jul 2014

besides mine.


And I'm hysterical.

And POed, mightily.

And I vote, always have, always will.

And NOT going to GET over it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am hysterical AND my ha...