General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFederal judge: Arguments against gay marriage 'are not those of serious people'
A federal judge on Tuesday struck down Kentucky's ban on gay marriage, and in doing so he issued a scathing rebuke to opponents of same-sex marriage.
In his ruling, District Judge John G. Heyburn II shredded the state's argument that a gay marriage ban was necessary from a biological standpoint because "traditional marriages contribute to a stable birth rate which, in turn, ensures the state's long-term economic stability." Heyburn pulled no punches in labeling that claim "disingenuous."
These arguments are not those of serious people. Though it seems almost unnecessary to explain, here are the reasons why. Even assuming the state has a legitimate interest in promoting procreation, the Court fails to see, and Defendant never explains, how the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage has any effect whatsoever on procreation among heterosexual spouses. Excluding same-sex couples from marriage does not change the number of heterosexual couples who choose to get married, the number who choose to have children, or the number of children they have. [...] The state's attempts to connect the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage to its interest in economic stability and in "ensuring humanity's continued existence" are at best illogical and even bewildering.
http://theweek.com/article/index/264096/speedreads-federal-judge-arguments-against-gay-marriage-are-not-those-of-serious-people
shenmue
(38,506 posts)I'm so happy, I could squee.
giftedgirl77
(4,713 posts)sheshe2
(83,785 posts)The comment from Judge Heyburn
Rock on Kentucky!
Thanks joeybee.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)humanity in positions of power where they do not belong. Fortunately, these federal judges seem human, intelligent and capable of making fair decisions.
sheshe2
(83,785 posts)Thanks RKP.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)William769
(55,147 posts)RKP5637
(67,109 posts)dickthegrouch
(3,174 posts)a few more unhappy mixed marriages where one party is actually homosexual but hiding it (usually from their own family).
While I have known a few mixed marriages that worked, because they were completely open about it and each partner was free to seek sex outside the marriage, those where one or both partners were closeted have in my experience invariably failed.
avebury
(10,952 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)These same old tired arguments, when subjected to a little scrutiny, just sort of fall apart like a tissue at a snot convention. And these aren't the only arguments that happens to from our good friends on the right.
surrealAmerican
(11,361 posts)Thank you, Judge Heyburn.
Logical
(22,457 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,689 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Bigotry, in all its inglorious stupidity, shot down in flames.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Just a bunch of Victorian Hillbillies from one side of the fence or the other sticking their overly long and self-righteous noses where they don't belong.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)And why aren't we arguing that infertile straight couples should have their marriages annulled? Clearly they aren't contributing to a stable birth rate.
indepat
(20,899 posts)of serious people, but rather of deluded and ideologically rigid religious jerk-faces.
lululu
(301 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)that they won't be able to grasp even this level of clarity. Check out some of those comments from these very touched people, thankfully only a few, though those few are super diarrhea mouths enough to pump out the volume of a whole village of idiots.
Perhaps the theocrat is the maximum level of right wing insane. How do they not get that they are the ones trying to use the power of the state to enforce their religion when they howl at the judge for being "activist".