Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(85,996 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:54 PM Jul 2014

Pentagon: No Iraq mission creep. We just need 'FLEXIBILITY' . . . oh, and yeah, maybe more troops

from the Guardian:


Pentagon says growing US forces in Iraq need 'flexibility' for mission
Spokesman says there is 'no mission creep' to US's increased involvement while Iraqi ambassador renews plea for air strikes

____ A day after the Pentagon announced an additional 300 US troops arrived in Iraq to secure the embassy, its press secretary, Rear Admiral John Kirby, contended that Obama needs "flexibility" in assessing how many army special forces, marines and other uniformed personnel are sufficient for the missions he wants executed.

Unofficially, the Pentagon is indicating that the number of troops in Iraq is likely to continue the incremental expansion that President Barack Obama launched last month after Islamic State forces overran Sunni areas of the country.

"There's no mission creep. The missions haven't changed. Some of the numbers have been added in the security assistance realm," Kirby said Tuesday.

"The commander-in-chief and the military leadership here in the building, I think, expect and should have a certain measure of flexibility here in how we manage the resources available."


That "flexibility", critics say, is taking the form of a slowly deepening military involvement. According to statistics Kirby clarified on Tuesday, 120 of the 300 army special forces "advisers" authorized to plot the defense of Baghdad have yet to arrive. Among their jobs is to tell the Pentagon later this month what the follow-on role of the United States ought to be, in response to what Kirby described as a continued threat to Baghdad.

Already the skies above Iraq are dotted with US aircraft . . .


read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/01/iraq-us-forces-involvement-mission-obama-isis

related:

President Obama Orders New U.S. Troop Escalation in Iraq - Drones, Helicopters, Security Forces
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025172838
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pentagon: No Iraq mission creep. We just need 'FLEXIBILITY' . . . oh, and yeah, maybe more troops (Original Post) bigtree Jul 2014 OP
To be fair, our military is just figuring out the situation and needs to be TwilightGardener Jul 2014 #1

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
1. To be fair, our military is just figuring out the situation and needs to be
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:46 PM
Jul 2014

able to have enough personnel to protect itself and fly in and out--adjusting the numbers doesn't bother me for that reason. Don't need another Alamo or Blackhawk Down incident. Now, if they announce some sort of plan to insert troops to hold Baghdad or some other area, then we're getting in farther than I'm comfortable with.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon: No Iraq mission...