Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:11 PM Jul 2014

Should the Democratic Party directly target income inequality in 2014 and beyond?

If no, what should be targeted instead...and if not, how else can the party get hard-hit people, middle-class, working-class and the jobless, to go to the polls at all?


3 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes, they should target income inequality directly
3 (100%)
They should target income inequality, but only indirectly
0 (0%)
They shouldn't target income inequality at all-other things matter much more(state which other things below)
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should the Democratic Party directly target income inequality in 2014 and beyond? (Original Post) Ken Burch Jul 2014 OP
Not unless they've got a plan leftstreet Jul 2014 #1
Yes! TreasonousBastard Jul 2014 #3
Have to agree. Bullshit walks. TheKentuckian Jul 2014 #4
Yes, income inequality is the disease, a shrinking middle class is just a symptom. Uncle Joe Jul 2014 #2
Not directly, indirectly would broaden the voter support. BillZBubb Jul 2014 #5

leftstreet

(36,108 posts)
1. Not unless they've got a plan
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:13 PM
Jul 2014

If they're just spouting 'we feel your pain' bullshit to get elected, it'll bite them on their arses

People are fed up

Uncle Joe

(58,365 posts)
2. Yes, income inequality is the disease, a shrinking middle class is just a symptom.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:14 PM
Jul 2014

Thanks for the thread, Ken Burch.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
5. Not directly, indirectly would broaden the voter support.
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:44 PM
Jul 2014

Going directly at income inequality would allow the right wing to parry with their standard talking points: income redistribution, class warfare, socialism, penalizing success...the usual claptrap. Unfortunately, those talking points resonate with independents.

We need an indirect approach that looks at policies aimed at helping the middle class and working classes RECOVER. That should be the theme. The poor and jobless would be included in that because they would have opportunities as the middle and working classes grow.

The policies must be BOLD, not the usual milquetoast platitudes. For instance, restore tax rates on those making over $200K to their 1993 (Clinton years) level. The reagan/republican tax scheme has had a disastrous effect on the middle and working classes. The decline began with those cuts. The bush tax cuts made matters even worse. They promised an economic boom, instead we go a near depression and huge debts. The well off need to pay their fair share, not get more and more tax cuts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the Democratic Par...