Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 09:07 AM Jul 2014

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Still an antivaccine crank after all these years

Only really long time readers will remember this, but back in the day (June 2005, to be exact), I discovered Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and his antivaccine nuttery when he published his epically bad piece of antivaccine conspiracy mongering, Deadly Immunity, both in Salon.com ( link here: https://web.archive.org/web/20050618015256/http://salon.com/news/feature/2005/06/16/thimerosal/index_np.html ) and Rolling Stone (the latter of which doubled down on it a few years later by reposting it). My deconstruction of the logical fallacies, errors of science and fact, and just general silliness of Kennedy’s article was one of the first times I was ever really “noticed” in the blogosphere. Since then, every so often, or so it seems, I’m drawn back to RFK, Jr., just because he can’t seem to stop the conspiracy mongering over the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal in vaccines and his obsession with its link to autism. It’s a link that’s long been disproven by clinical trials, but that hasn’t stopped him from trying to use various cases to “prove” a link between vaccines and autism, insinuate that the CDC is covering up a thimerosal-autism link, out-crank another vaccine-autism crank Sharyl Attkisson, use the case of Poul Thorsen to distract from inconvenient science, and link his environmental activism to his antivaccine activism, thus tarnishing the environmentalist movement as long as the Kennedy name.

When last we visited him, RFK Jr. had been threatening to…write a book! And write a book he had done, a book entitled Thimerosal: Let the Science Speak: Mercury Toxicity in Vaccines and the Political, Regulatory, and Media Failures That Continue to Threaten Public Health. With the book’s imminent release in early August, media attention has been less than stellar, but the attention of the antivaccine crankosphere has been a bit more intense. Indeed, I had considered letting this cup pass because, well, I’m sick and tired of RFK, Jr., and I’m not sure that there’s much that I want to say about him right now. Still, as I say, there are some topics that inevitably drag me in, even as I resist and procrastinate for a couple of days, and RFK Jr.’s antivaccine quackery appears to be such a topic. Also, there has been a bit of mainstream media attention in the form of an article by Keith Kloor in The Washington Post a few days ago entitled Robert Kennedy Jr.’s belief in autism-vaccine connection, and its political peril. There are a few juicy tidbits that I learned in the article, although the article seems a bit more sympathetic to RFK, Jr. than I would like. The article also says little about RFK Jr.’s partner in this endeavor, Dr. Mark Hyman, who has been an intermittent topic on this blog and has been known to http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2009/09/08/dr-mark-hyman-mangles-autism-science-on/

The good things I learned is that, increasingly, RFK, Jr. is being viewed by mainstream politicians and media as the crank that he is. (And, make no mistake, on the subject of thimerosal in vaccines, RFK, Jr. is a crank par excellence.) Remember Senator Barbara Mikulski, for example? She co-sponsored a resolution that declared one week during last October to be Naturopathic Medicine Week, or, as I called it, Quackery Week. She also co-chaired a meeting with the creator of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), where Harkin complained that NCCAM had “fallen short” because it hadn’t “validated” enough CAM, completely misunderstanding how science works and supported an amendment to the Affordable Care Act to have it cover CAM practitioners. It goes on and on; she appeared at the anniversary of the integrative medicine center at the University of Maryland and has even appeared on Dr. Oz’s radio show to promote “integrative medicine.” She is among the most woo-friendly legislators out there.

And even she didn’t take RFK, Jr. seriously:

Sen. Barbara Mikulski listened impassively as Robert Kennedy Jr. made his case. He had to talk over the din in the marbled hallway just outside the Senate chambers, where he was huddled with Mikulski, two of her aides and three allies of his who had come to Washington for this April meeting.

Kennedy, a longtime environmental activist and an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, had thought Mikulski would be receptive to an issue that has consumed him for a decade, even as friends and associates have told him repeatedly that it’s a lost cause. But she grew visibly impatient the longer he talked.


Snip

According to Kloor, Mikulski’s reaction was less than enthusiastic. Basically, she just referred RFK, Jr. to Sen. Bernie Sanders, because he “cares about brain health” and oversees a related subcommittee. Sanders’ reaction was at best noncommittal, perhaps because RFK, Jr. basically made threats if he doesn’t get what he want. His threat? To publish his book! However, his threat was highly disingenuous, coupled as it was with the usual claim from antivaccinationists that they’re really and truly “not anti-vaccine”:

The normally voluble, white-haired senator was convivial, then, as Kennedy got going, fell silent. “We don’t want to publish this book,” Kennedy told him, holding up a copy of his manuscript. “We are very pro-vaccine.” He motioned to Hyman across the table. “Vaccines save lives. We don’t want to alarm the public by showing them the science. We have a publisher lined up, ready to publish it. But we said no.”


Much, much more at the link.
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2014/07/22/robert-f-kennedy-jr-still-an-antivaccine-crank-after-all-these-years/

David Gorski - Orac at Scienceblogs - has been writing about pseudoscience for more than a decade, but in the last few years has concentrated almost exclusively on medical woo. From his wiki page:

David H. Gorski is an American surgical oncologist, Professor of surgery at Wayne State University,[1] and a surgical oncologist at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, specializing in breast cancer surgery.[2] He is a critic of alternative medicine and the anti-vaccination movement. He is the author of a blog, Respectful Insolence,[3] and is the managing editor of the website, Science-Based Medicine.[4][5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gorski

Orac knows his shit, and has Kennedy absolutely pegged for the anti-vax asshat that he is.

Sid
76 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: Still an antivaccine crank after all these years (Original Post) SidDithers Jul 2014 OP
Nice smear. Octafish Jul 2014 #1
Maybe the BFEE made Kennedy the anti-vax asshat that he's become...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #2
That is character assassination. Octafish Jul 2014 #5
No, it's hysteria. Archae Jul 2014 #21
You said writing about JFK assassination was ''beating a dead horse.'' Octafish Jul 2014 #27
I know, that was 8th St here in Sheboygan. Archae Jul 2014 #40
Character assassination is quoting someone accurately? REP Jul 2014 #30
!!! zappaman Jul 2014 #34
Calling him an ''Asshat'' is. Octafish Jul 2014 #35
Calling him an asshat is not "character assassination" REP Jul 2014 #37
I'll remember this. Octafish Jul 2014 #42
Good. REP Jul 2014 #51
Sorry to read that. Octafish Jul 2014 #53
Why? He's been dead twenty years and a week. REP Jul 2014 #66
So do suggestions that posters are paid shills. NuclearDem Jul 2014 #50
You must be right. Here's why I feel that way. Octafish Jul 2014 #52
They could be paid shills... NuclearDem Jul 2014 #54
"tug at your forelock" may be my new favourite phrase... SidDithers Jul 2014 #60
Aww, thanks! REP Jul 2014 #72
+1 HuckleB Jul 2014 #76
Don't want to be portrayed as an anti-vax nut, NuclearDem Jul 2014 #8
Yup... Ellbee Jul 2014 #38
For something to be a smear, the allegation need to be false. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #13
Mercury isn't a healthy additive. Octafish Jul 2014 #23
Your response demonstrates your lack of understanding cleanhippie Jul 2014 #28
So why bother to reply? Octafish Jul 2014 #29
I did inform you. You chose to ignore that. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #31
I've read your posts and learned nothing. Octafish Jul 2014 #32
Do you still disagree that the post in question is a "smear"? cleanhippie Jul 2014 #33
Of course it's a smear. Octafish Jul 2014 #36
For something to be a smear, the allegation need to be false cleanhippie Jul 2014 #39
Calling him an ''Asshat.'' Octafish Jul 2014 #41
On this issue, he is an "asshat". cleanhippie Jul 2014 #44
Immunologically, yes. Octafish Jul 2014 #45
No, I don't understand why you would object to any anti-vaxx wing-nut being called anything. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #47
+1 HuckleB Jul 2014 #65
+1...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #74
As suspected, you are arguing nothing of substance. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #55
Sodium isn't healthy. Chlorine isn't healthy. Archae Jul 2014 #43
Gee. What's it called when you make up stuff about someone else? Octafish Jul 2014 #46
What does that mean? HuckleB Jul 2014 #67
The poster said I wrote something I didn't. Octafish Jul 2014 #73
You seem to require this.... Humanist_Activist Jul 2014 #49
Uhm. Orac and Sid are correct. The science does not lie. longship Jul 2014 #14
well, at least you were first snooper2 Jul 2014 #17
Yeah. Like the time you kindly recommended I go to Duquesne. Octafish Jul 2014 #18
How is it a smear? zappaman Jul 2014 #20
''Asshat.'' Octafish Jul 2014 #22
On this ridiculous stance, he is indeed an "asshat" zappaman Jul 2014 #24
he deserves this smear. he needs to shut the fuck up on this vaccination issue. m-lekktor Jul 2014 #70
SBM is a great site for debunking woo bullshit- anti-vaxxers, "neuropathy", acupuncture. n/t X_Digger Jul 2014 #3
I couldn't agree more... SidDithers Jul 2014 #4
Is he the Kennedy goober who's on the keep marijuana illegal!' kick? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #6
Not sure. I've never noticed or researched his position on pot... SidDithers Jul 2014 #7
I just went and googled. Anti-MJ is Patrick Kennedy. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2014 #9
Thanks for the info... SidDithers Jul 2014 #10
His anti-vaccine stance does not outweigh the good he has done for the environment. Punkingal Jul 2014 #16
I disagree. zappaman Jul 2014 #19
The entire anti-vaxx movement has blood on its hands. And he is as responsible as Jenny McCarthy. cleanhippie Jul 2014 #48
Well yeah, to his credibility being questionable now... Punkingal Jul 2014 #56
then there's always this gossip.....Kennedy Jr. accused of cheating on actress-fiancée Cheryl Hines. a kennedy Jul 2014 #11
Irrelevent... SidDithers Jul 2014 #12
Cheating notwithstanding, my opinion of Cheryl Hines just went down a couple notches. progressoid Jul 2014 #25
k&r tammywammy Jul 2014 #15
But, but, but I thought it was Dr. Jenny!!!! HockeyMom Jul 2014 #26
FWIW: Thimerosal has been removed from the majority of vaccines for children under 6 or think Jul 2014 #57
Posting science and facts? RobertEarl Jul 2014 #58
kick! zappaman Jul 2014 #59
I am sorry to hear that he believes that. I have always found what he had to say very Douglas Carpenter Jul 2014 #61
Recommended! HuckleB Jul 2014 #62
Gorski is an authority on RFK Jr's anti-vax activities... SidDithers Jul 2014 #64
Do you ever have anything positive to say/express? closeupready Jul 2014 #63
I agree and am glad he posted RFK jr's nonsense for all to see as well! zappaman Jul 2014 #68
Pointing out dangerous mis-information is VERY POSITIVE etherealtruth Jul 2014 #69
+1 HuckleB Jul 2014 #75
... SidDithers Jul 2014 #71

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
5. That is character assassination.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 09:36 AM
Jul 2014

For those interested why it matters on DU:

Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy believed President Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy.

That's what his son and daughter, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Rory Kennedy, reported in an interview with Charlie Rose last weekend in Dallas.



It's also what author and Salon founder David Talbot reported, when he called Robert F. Kennedy the "first conspiracy theorist" in 2007.

Here's why the news from Robert and Rory is so important:

The important issue is that he and his sister reported their father -- the president's principal counselor and the nation's chief law enforcement officer -- privately thought a conspiracy was behind the assassination of President Kennedy.

RFK called the Warren Commission report "shoddy workmanship."

Attorney General Kennedy knew about the Ruby-Mafia connections immediately, which is vital when considering the Mafia were hired by Allen Dulles and the CIA during Eisenhower's administration to murder Fidel Castro -- an operation which the CIA failed to inform the president and attorney general.

The interview with Charlie Rose marked the first time members of the immediate Kennedy family have voiced the attorney general's doubts about the Warren Commission and its lone gunman theory.


Those are the facts we learned Friday, Jan. 11, 2013. It's called history.

Original Post: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022194573

Archae

(46,300 posts)
21. No, it's hysteria.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 12:01 PM
Jul 2014

Second hand stories from an anti-vaccine nutcase.

I do realize that it's just IM-POSSIBLE for just one guy to have shot JFK in your view, and I realize you probably still worship anti-Semites like Oliver Stone and vicious anti-gays like Jim Garrison.

But in the 50+ years since JFK was killed, all the credible (as opposed to wild speculation) evidence points to one radical grandstanding murderer.
Lee Harvey Oswald.

The "magic bullet" is a lie.

The "grassy knoll" is a lie.

And RFK Jr's credibility is a lie.

REP

(21,691 posts)
30. Character assassination is quoting someone accurately?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:26 PM
Jul 2014

America is not a monarchy and the Kennedys are not royalty. We owe them no fealty. You may tug at your forelock at the mention of the rum-runner's kin, but don't act so offended when others do not.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
34. !!!
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:41 PM
Jul 2014

"you may tug at your forelock at the mention of the rum-runner's kin, but don't act so offended when others do not."

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
35. Calling him an ''Asshat'' is.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jul 2014

Labels change the way we think about a person.

As for "tugging my forelock": I am an American. I bow to no one.

Respect? That's another thing. I've seen relatively few men who deserve it. RFK, Jr., is one who does.

REP

(21,691 posts)
37. Calling him an asshat is not "character assassination"
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:52 PM
Jul 2014

Detailing his extramarital affairs might be, but calling him a name based on his incredibly stupid and discredited opinions isn't assassinating his character. I'm sure you have some sort of macro that spits out "assassination" whenever "Kennedy" is keyed in, but really, this is a bit much for even you.

You don't think you grovel at the feet of all things Kennedy, because it is hard to recognize one's own behavior for what it is. You do not bow; you prostrate yourself and have no idea how ridiculous you look to those outside the cult of the criminal's family.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
42. I'll remember this.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:16 PM
Jul 2014

REP: "You don't think you grovel at the feet of all things Kennedy, because it is hard to recognize one's own behavior for what it is. You do not bow; you prostrate yourself and have no idea how ridiculous you look to those outside the cult of the criminal's family."

REP

(21,691 posts)
66. Why? He's been dead twenty years and a week.
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 04:35 PM
Jul 2014

And he did have a good memory for petty things of no consequence and no mind at all for practical matters.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
52. You must be right. Here's why I feel that way.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 05:01 PM
Jul 2014
GCHQ describes the purpose of JTRIG in starkly clear terms:

“using online techniques to make something happen in the real or cyber world,” including “information ops (influence or disruption).”



Source: https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

The same NSA that unconstitutionally spies on Americans also gets to propagandize Americans.

So, yeah. It can't get more Orwell paid shill than that.
 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
54. They could be paid shills...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 05:16 PM
Jul 2014

Or they could be people with working understandings of science who find the anti-vax/Fukushima hysteria ridiculous and consequently have reasonable doubts about the opinions of any poster that buys into the aforementioned hysteria.

You're right, though, it's probably zebras.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
60. "tug at your forelock" may be my new favourite phrase...
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jul 2014

that's poetic brilliance, my friend.



Sid

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
13. For something to be a smear, the allegation need to be false.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:55 AM
Jul 2014

Speaking strictly about this issue, his anti-vax wing-nuttery is well documented, substantiated, and proven factual.

What is it, exactly, that you seem to take issue with?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
23. Mercury isn't a healthy additive.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 12:10 PM
Jul 2014

Don't you think?

It seems like RFK, Jr. prefers to err on the side of caution.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
28. Your response demonstrates your lack of understanding
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jul 2014

Of both what a smear is and what mercury was doing in vaccines.

Nonetheless, I don't wish to argue proven science with you, but if you would like to further discuss why the post we're discussing ISN'T a smear, you can start by trying to refute what I actually responded to you with.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. So why bother to reply?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jul 2014

Rather than insults, try to inform. It's the democratic thing to do.

So, how are you an expert?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
31. I did inform you. You chose to ignore that.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:30 PM
Jul 2014

Then you tried to change the subject.

Why do YOU bother to reply? You don't seem to care about facts, science, or the actual definition of words.

Your accusations of insult only further demonstrate your unwillingness to address the issue at hand as you know you are simply wrong on all accounts.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
32. I've read your posts and learned nothing.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:35 PM
Jul 2014

Unless you add a link, I doubt there's really much there, "doctor."

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
33. Do you still disagree that the post in question is a "smear"?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:39 PM
Jul 2014

That is what prompted my reply, yet you have not even addressed that at all.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
39. For something to be a smear, the allegation need to be false
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 02:56 PM
Jul 2014

Speaking strictly about this issue, his anti-vax wing-nuttery is well documented, substantiated, and proven factual.

What is it, exactly, that you seem to take issue with?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
41. Calling him an ''Asshat.''
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:15 PM
Jul 2014

So, what are your qualifications to back up what was in the OP and to denigrate me above?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
44. On this issue, he is an "asshat".
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:21 PM
Jul 2014

Perhaps you don't like the author's choice of word, but that does not negate his anti-vaxx wing-nuttery.

So far, all you have done here is not like a word used that, while some may find iffensive, is accurate.

Is there anything of substance, other than your dislike of the word "asshat" that refutes this not being a smear?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
45. Immunologically, yes.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:56 PM
Jul 2014

All it takes for the human body to go out of whack is one tiny particle. Take a person with an allergy. A few years back, a neighbor's wife -- a kindergarten teacher -- accidently ingested a sesame seed. She went into shock and almost died. While she came back to work a year later, her health never was the same.

There is a similar concern regarding many chemicals and elements like mercury having an impact on human health. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine has done pioneering work on mercury's impact.

Now do you understand why I don't think a "Democrat" should be calling RFK, Jr. an "Asshat"?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
47. No, I don't understand why you would object to any anti-vaxx wing-nut being called anything.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 04:01 PM
Jul 2014

Anti-vaxx wing-nuttery is wholeheartedly deserving of every disparaging comment it recieves, regardless of political persuasion.

Those who espouse anti-vaxx wing-nuttery should be ashamed of themselves and are to be marginalized at every opportunity.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
55. As suspected, you are arguing nothing of substance.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 05:57 PM
Jul 2014

If "asshat" is your only objection, as it seems to be, I'll bid you a good day.

Archae

(46,300 posts)
43. Sodium isn't healthy. Chlorine isn't healthy.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 03:18 PM
Jul 2014

In fact both can easily kill you.

But a compound, sodium chloride is needed for survival.
Salt.

Thus, mercury COMPOUNDS are not "poison."

Now get your nose out of "Natural News," "Age Of Autism" and Alex Jones, and try reading some actual science for a change, not hysteria.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
73. The poster said I wrote something I didn't.
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 10:15 PM
Jul 2014

"Now get your nose out of "Natural News," "Age Of Autism" and Alex Jones, and try reading some actual science for a change, not hysteria."

longship

(40,416 posts)
14. Uhm. Orac and Sid are correct. The science does not lie.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 11:08 AM
Jul 2014

Vaccines are very safe. RFK Jr.'s pronouncements about vaccines are not safe. He's a kook on the topic.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
20. How is it a smear?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 11:55 AM
Jul 2014

You agree with his anti-vax views that are completely UNSUPPORTED by science?

BTW, I don't expect an answer to that question, so go ahead and divert away!

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
24. On this ridiculous stance, he is indeed an "asshat"
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 12:13 PM
Jul 2014

Which is too bad since he is right on when it comes to the environment.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
70. he deserves this smear. he needs to shut the fuck up on this vaccination issue.
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 06:45 PM
Jul 2014

he is promoting a harmful cause.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
4. I couldn't agree more...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 09:22 AM
Jul 2014

I first started reading Gorski at ScienceBlogs, and loved Steve Novella at SBM.

It was pretty cool to find out that Gorski at SBM was the same Orac at ScienceBlogs that I was such a fan of.



Sid

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
6. Is he the Kennedy goober who's on the keep marijuana illegal!' kick?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:03 AM
Jul 2014

Because he was a slacker as a kid, and did marijuana, therefore it's marijuana's fault he was a slacker?

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
7. Not sure. I've never noticed or researched his position on pot...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jul 2014

He's been an anti-vaccine dumbass since his (now retracted) article appeared in Salon in 2005. I've been following his 'mercury in vaccines causes autism' crusade since then.

I'm glad to see that he's becoming more and more marginalized on that topic as the years go by.

Sid

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
10. Thanks for the info...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:17 AM
Jul 2014


I know that RFK Jr has been an pretty well respected environmentalist.

But, IMO, his 'vaccines cause autism' bullshit has more than outweighed any good he's done on the environmental front.

Sid

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
16. His anti-vaccine stance does not outweigh the good he has done for the environment.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 11:13 AM
Jul 2014

How could it? He is having zero effect with his anti-vaccine stance. He has done good things for environmental causes.

zappaman

(20,606 posts)
19. I disagree.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 11:53 AM
Jul 2014

Yeah, he was great with his environmental stance, no doubt.
But being an anti-vaxxer AND having the ability to reach many people with that ridiculous, bullshit message can do quite a bit of harm.
It's a shame really.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
48. The entire anti-vaxx movement has blood on its hands. And he is as responsible as Jenny McCarthy.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 04:35 PM
Jul 2014

People are dying because of anti-vaccine wing nuts. Childhood diseases not seen in years are making a comeback because some choose to believe the nonsense he and his ilk espouse.

It doesn't negate his work in other areas, but it does ruin his credibility.

Punkingal

(9,522 posts)
56. Well yeah, to his credibility being questionable now...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 06:29 PM
Jul 2014

But what he has done for the environment in the past still stands. That's all I'm saying.

a kennedy

(29,612 posts)
11. then there's always this gossip.....Kennedy Jr. accused of cheating on actress-fiancée Cheryl Hines.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:17 AM
Jul 2014

This could curb Cheryl Hines’ enthusiasm to marry Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Kennedy may have been cheating on his fetching fiancée with Chelsea Chapman Kirwan, a Connecticut socialite and the wife of a prominent plastic surgeon, according to two published reports.

Citing sources close to the allegedly cuckolded husband Laurence Kirwan, The Daily Mail reported the two began stepping out before he and his wife separated in July 2012.

That’s eight months after Kennedy and Hines began dating — and two months after Kennedy’s troubled second wife, Mary Richardson, hanged herself in a barn.

Kirwan, 62, who is based mostly in London but also maintains a Manhattan and Norwalk, Conn. practice, claims his 42-year-old wife and Kennedy met at a Connecticut gym.

The allegedly duped doctor claims it was Chelsea’s “game plan” to “trade up to RFK Jr.,” according to the British paper.

Court records show the Kirwans, who live in Greenwich, Conn., are in the midst of the divorce.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/rfk-jr-cheating-actress-fiancee-hines-report-article-1.1842281

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
12. Irrelevent...
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 10:22 AM
Jul 2014

I don't really care who he is or isn't sleeping with.

He's a nutter because of he thinks thimerosal causes autism.

Sid

progressoid

(49,934 posts)
25. Cheating notwithstanding, my opinion of Cheryl Hines just went down a couple notches.
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 12:29 PM
Jul 2014

She's marrying him?

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
26. But, but, but I thought it was Dr. Jenny!!!!
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 01:09 PM
Jul 2014
RFK, Jr. has been a Naturalist for as long as I can remember. That he was against vax a very long time ago is not surprising at all to anyone who has listened to him over the years.
 

think

(11,641 posts)
57. FWIW: Thimerosal has been removed from the majority of vaccines for children under 6 or
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 06:30 PM
Jul 2014

reduced to trace amounts.

Bold added for emphesis.

Thimerosal in Vaccines

~Snip~

Introduction

Thimerosal is a mercury-containing organic compound (an organomercurial). Since the 1930s, it has been widely used as a preservative in a number of biological and drug products, including many vaccines, to help prevent potentially life threatening contamination with harmful microbes. Over the past several years, because of an increasing awareness of the theoretical potential for neurotoxicity of even low levels of organomercurials and because of the increased number of thimerosal containing vaccines that had been added to the infant immunization schedule, concerns about the use of thimerosal in vaccines and other products have been raised. Indeed, because of these concerns, the Food and Drug Administration has worked with, and continues to work with, vaccine manufacturers to reduce or eliminate thimerosal from vaccines.
Thimerosal has been removed from or reduced to trace amounts in all vaccines routinely recommended for children 6 years of age and younger, with the exception of inactivated influenza vaccine (see Table 1). A preservative-free version of the inactivated influenza vaccine (contains trace amounts of thimerosal) is available in limited supply at this time for use in infants, children and pregnant women. Some vaccines such as Td, which is indicated for older children (? 7 years of age) and adults, are also now available in formulations that are free of thimerosal or contain only trace amounts. Vaccines with trace amounts of thimerosal contain 1 microgram or less of mercury per dose.

In the following pages, a discussion of preservatives, the use of thimerosal as a preservative, guidelines on exposure to organomercurials (primarily methylmercury), thimerosal toxicity, recent and future FDA actions, and the conclusions of the Institute of Medicine's most recent review of thimerosal in vaccines are presented. This narrative on thimerosal contains references to the literature and links to other sites for readers who wish additional information; for quick reference, a number of frequently asked questions (FAQs) and answers are provided....

http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
58. Posting science and facts?
Wed Jul 23, 2014, 08:21 PM
Jul 2014

In a thread just meant to slam a good person who has shown his only care is for the children? Good on you.

Imagine that if it was discovered that thimerosal did cause injury. The liabilities would be huge. You can then imagine that the companies faced with such liabilities would do everything they could to suppress the science.

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
61. I am sorry to hear that he believes that. I have always found what he had to say very
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 03:26 PM
Jul 2014

smart and interesting. If he is propagating this nonsense - that is very sad.

SidDithers

(44,228 posts)
64. Gorski is an authority on RFK Jr's anti-vax activities...
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 03:35 PM
Jul 2014

Whenever Kennedy is in the news, pushing his bullshit, you can count on Gorski / Orac to put up a post reminding everyone why Kennedy should be marginalized on the issue.

I'm sure there will be more as we get closer to the release of the Kennedy's book.

Oh, and if you want a free copy of the book, dumbass anti-vaxxer Jake Crosby is hosting it at his dumbass anti-vaxxer website autisminvestigated. Crosby thinks that Kennedy isn't enough of an anti-vax crank, and is accusing him of being part of the mercury-autism cover-up.

Truth really is stranger than fiction.

Sid

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
63. Do you ever have anything positive to say/express?
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 03:32 PM
Jul 2014

Or do you just slam and smear people? Is this board your personal dumping ground for all your ridiculous negative juju? I didn't get that memo.

There's a reason people dislike you, and a big part of that is you poison the forums with this sourness.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
69. Pointing out dangerous mis-information is VERY POSITIVE
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jul 2014

If one person takes this as an opportunity to inform themselves the thread will have served an important role.

Nothing untruthful was posted in the OP, no smears, no mis-information .... encouraging folk to act against their health and safety (as in railing against vaccination) is ridiculous (and dangerous ... especially when you have the publics respect and attention)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.: S...