Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,166 posts)
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 08:45 PM Jul 2014

what is to stop big blue states such as Illinois, New York, and California

from having their medicaid expand to cover the uninsured in other states for the three years that the feds are paying the whole freight? Surely if a citizen of say, California is traveling to see his family in say Texas and gets ill then Medical would pay for emergency treatment. This would simply expand that.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
what is to stop big blue states such as Illinois, New York, and California (Original Post) dsc Jul 2014 OP
nothing AngryAmish Jul 2014 #1
I am not saying the usual medicaid dsc Jul 2014 #2
Medicaid is administered by the states, individually. SheilaT Jul 2014 #3
under normal circumstances, no they wouldn't dsc Jul 2014 #4
I honestly don't know much about Medicaid, SheilaT Jul 2014 #5
I'd rather see states like AR who expanded Medicaid improve the infrastructure. moriah Jul 2014 #6
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
1. nothing
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 08:49 PM
Jul 2014

I, as a resident of Illinois, who is two years behind in Medicaide bills since we have no money, demand that we take on the indigent healthcare of Indiana, Wisconsin and Michigan, since it is the right thing to do. It is my obligation because I said so.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
2. I am not saying the usual medicaid
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 08:57 PM
Jul 2014

which states do pay some of the cost of, but the expansion which is entirely federally funded for the next two years.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
3. Medicaid is administered by the states, individually.
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 09:44 PM
Jul 2014

No state has a responsibility for the medical benefits of people in another state.

In other words, each state decides what and how much it's going to do with their Medicaid, and one state isn't going to cover, another state's residents.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
4. under normal circumstances, no they wouldn't
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 09:47 PM
Jul 2014

but say Andrew Cuomo or Marin O Malley want to make a huge impression on the primary electorate, that would make a huge impression on the primary electorate.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
5. I honestly don't know much about Medicaid,
Thu Jul 24, 2014, 11:29 PM
Jul 2014

but I rather doubt one state could use its Medicaid funds to pay for the health care of those from another state. And it's not as though Medicaid covers everyone who deserves it in the first place.

Plus, as a practical consideration, how would New York, in your example, figure out which citizens from which states to cover? Would they need to be treated in NYS?

moriah

(8,311 posts)
6. I'd rather see states like AR who expanded Medicaid improve the infrastructure.
Fri Jul 25, 2014, 01:07 AM
Jul 2014

The healthy poor uninsured got insurance policies through the Exchange, the sick ones got regular Medicaid. However, it's nearly impossible to find a doctor accepting new adult Medicaid patients in many counties in Arkansas. A friend of mine has coverage, but she's limited to ER visits for emergencies until she can find a PCP in her county. She called them all on the list.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»what is to stop big blue ...