Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGaza as Microcosm: A System Dynamics Perspective
This is an article I wrote yesterday as my contribution to the Middle East commentary. It may be too abstract a view for some, but it's how I see the situation.
Here's a short look at Gaza through the lens of system dynamics.
I see the Gaza situation in terms reminiscent of the theory of social evolution proposed by Andrew Schmookler in his 1984 book, The Parable of the Tribes. The bare bones of Schmookler's theory are this:
Now, to a first approximation, all wars are about resources raw materials, energy or land. Those are the basic elements needed to create new social structure. Any society that runs short of resources must find new sources or face dissolution. That applies whether the new sources come at the expense of a previous owner or not.
Societies that control resources that are coveted by an expansionist neighbor will almost always resist. Its the way life works among social animals. The greater the threat, the stronger the resistance.
Israels willingness to use utterly disproportionate force (from the Dahiya Doctrine they are employing in Gaza up to the Samson Option) is the result of similar dynamics. They perceive an existential threat to their social group and are determined not to give it a toehold.
All the historical and moral justifications that are painted onto such conflicts are simply social group-integrity techniques (aka political messaging, aka propaganda). They have nothing to do with the actual roots of the conflicts dynamics, which is generally found in survival issues like resource shortages or external threats.
IMO the rise in oppression and warfare we are seeing around the world right now is the direct result of a buildup of pressures that can be predicted from Schmooklers option 3. The world is now full, and there is no free space left for expansion. Increasing pressure for resources is causing encroachment of all kinds on others, at every level from the individual to the national. Those who are encroached upon have nowhere to flee because the world is full. That leaves resistance as the only option, and the resistance or its possibility creates oppression. In this sense Gaza can be seen as a planetary microcosm - a small-scale version of the global situation, a single element of the fractal system of human civilization.
And speaking of oppression, I see institutions like the NSA as logical and perhaps even inevitable outcomes of the system dynamics of a globalized civilization that is hitting its limits. If we do manage to rein them in, other similar institutions will simply arise to fill the need.
It's all as natural as night following day
I see the Gaza situation in terms reminiscent of the theory of social evolution proposed by Andrew Schmookler in his 1984 book, The Parable of the Tribes. The bare bones of Schmookler's theory are this:
Imagine a group of tribes living within reach of one another. If all choose the way of peace, then all may live in peace. If one tribe becomes expansionist however, a neighboring tribe faces one of four possible outcomes:Unfortunately, option 3 is not open to the Palestinians they have nowhere to flee. They have tried option 4 - armed resistance - but the power balance appears to be too asymmetrical for success. The state of Israel seems determined to force one of the first two outcomes, and my current suspicion is that theyd be happiest with the first.
- It may be attacked and defeated, its people destroyed and its lands seized for the use of the victors.
- It may be defeated and have its people subjugated by the conqueror.
- It may flee from the area into some inaccessible (and undesirable) place, and its former homeland becomes part of the growing empire of the power-seeking tribe.
- It may arm to defend itself. If it is to be successful in this, it will discard its previous pacifism, and adopt many of the traits of the aggressor tribe.
Now, to a first approximation, all wars are about resources raw materials, energy or land. Those are the basic elements needed to create new social structure. Any society that runs short of resources must find new sources or face dissolution. That applies whether the new sources come at the expense of a previous owner or not.
Societies that control resources that are coveted by an expansionist neighbor will almost always resist. Its the way life works among social animals. The greater the threat, the stronger the resistance.
Israels willingness to use utterly disproportionate force (from the Dahiya Doctrine they are employing in Gaza up to the Samson Option) is the result of similar dynamics. They perceive an existential threat to their social group and are determined not to give it a toehold.
All the historical and moral justifications that are painted onto such conflicts are simply social group-integrity techniques (aka political messaging, aka propaganda). They have nothing to do with the actual roots of the conflicts dynamics, which is generally found in survival issues like resource shortages or external threats.
IMO the rise in oppression and warfare we are seeing around the world right now is the direct result of a buildup of pressures that can be predicted from Schmooklers option 3. The world is now full, and there is no free space left for expansion. Increasing pressure for resources is causing encroachment of all kinds on others, at every level from the individual to the national. Those who are encroached upon have nowhere to flee because the world is full. That leaves resistance as the only option, and the resistance or its possibility creates oppression. In this sense Gaza can be seen as a planetary microcosm - a small-scale version of the global situation, a single element of the fractal system of human civilization.
And speaking of oppression, I see institutions like the NSA as logical and perhaps even inevitable outcomes of the system dynamics of a globalized civilization that is hitting its limits. If we do manage to rein them in, other similar institutions will simply arise to fill the need.
It's all as natural as night following day
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 466 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post