General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen Who Make Virginity Pledges Struggle with Sex Once Married
http://www.livescience.com/47431-virginity-pledging-men-sexually-confused.html?1408449233
SAN FRANCISCO Men who make virginity pledges get strong social support to abstain from sex before the wedding night, but that backing disappears soon after they tie the knot, new research suggests.
These men are also taught to think of sex outside of marriage as animalistic and foul, but sacred within a marriage, according to a new study presented Aug. 17, here at the 109th American Sociological Association meeting.
As a result, male virginity pledgers can be somewhat confused and lost when it comes to sex after marriage, said study researcher Sarah Diefendorf, a sociology doctoral candidate at the University of Washington in Seattle. [The 10 Most Surprising Sex Statistics]
"They spend the first 20-something years of their lives being told that sex is wrong," Diefendorf told Live Science. "They're expected to make this transition from the beastly to the sacred, but they don't really have the tools to be able to do that effectively."
ck4829
(35,077 posts)These virginity pledges might as well be called Madonna-Whore Complex pledges.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna%E2%80%93whore_complex
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)and Guess what = I don't owe anyone My Status.
Nor do I really care to hear about anyone Else's sex life status.
If they want to share it, fine. That is their prerogative but damn, If I am going around asking about it.
What a big bunch of baloney.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)of the screwed-up thinking underlying this mindset.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)The fundie hatred of sex (even within marriage, they're not happy with it) is going to fuck people up. The human sex drive is incredibly powerful and fundies poison that so bad that the sex drive is going to get fucked up.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)The Duggar girl and new hubby are pregnant already after a short time. Lots of sex? Maybe.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)They seem happy from the outside looking in.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)In my experience, it takes practice to get good.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)be ashamed of having those thoughts. That will guarantee that they'll be randy, insatiable motherfuckers.
madokie
(51,076 posts)I grew up in the age before many girls were on the pill so we had to use other methods of BC. What the hell is the purpose of fucking these people up by indoctrinating them into believing that teen sex is bad or wrong.
No way would I be a party to any of this virginity pledges. Its not like you can wear the sex parts out or anything like that. LOL
My wife and I both had many sexual partners before we were a two some and it bothers me not one bit, nor does it bother her.
It's all about religion I get that and that my friends is a part of the reason I am NON religious today.
And good morning!
madokie
(51,076 posts)you made my day, thanks
Go have a good one, friend!
3catwoman3
(24,005 posts)...potential that presents itself in the last sentence of the OP - "...but they don't really have the tools."
My mother was unusually forward thinking for her/our time when it came to discussing sex. She told us everything about the physical "mechanics" of it (sometimes more than I wanted to know), and some about the emotions involved. She was also quite honest that it was not just for reproduction, and I remember her saying that newlyweds "...might decide 10 times a day - 'Let's go to bed.' ".
She felt it was definitely a girl's responsibility to keep things from going too far, as boys just could just not help themselves once aroused, and it was cruel to cause arousal and not follow through, if you will. Sex was also only right within marriage. I remember asking her once how you were supposed to make the transition from "No, don't, don't, don't!!!" to "Go for it!" I do not remember there being a good answer for that.
She also once said that she supposed there might come a time, if a woman remained unmarked long enough, that sex outside marriage might be understandable. I wanted to ask her how old I would have to be for that to be Ok for me, but I didn't, because I knew the answer would be about 104 -
Mom is 92 now, and her lookout has softened somewhat. Our 24 yr old son and his serious girlfriend recently spent about a week with her at a small cottage our family is fortunate enough to own in the Finger Lakes in NY. Prior to their arrival, she asked me to please tell them they we're welcome to use the master bedroom while they were there!
treestar
(82,383 posts)Humanity survived up to the sexual revolution.
And why would men be different from women ?
Some people get that it is not just a transaction
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)trying out new things together. Exploring sexuality does not need a wedding ring but, those who choose to wait should have a lot of fun catching up.
This is just another way to shame people for the choices they make in life.
In other words, I call BullShit, too.
Steaming, heaping piles of it.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)emotionally complex for some of the folks having problems. The same values that taught them to remain virginal tell them that sex is supposed to be part of religious faith and that it is supposed to serve God's purpose. Sex can become less about desire, love, and lust and more about living a religiously pure life. How do you have sex when your lessons are that you should remain prayerful all the time? Some people can't see how to cope.
And what if there is latent hostility over the choices one's parents made for the teenage boy and pushed him into? I can recall an old boyfriend, at age 30, going almost into a rage because he had been taught to abstain from masturbation. He was angry with his parents for teaching him not to relieve sexual frustration harmlessly.
I doubt the point was to push guilt over lifestyle choices. I do wonder if it is to open the topic about healthy discussion of teen male sexuality.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)relevant to their needs.
The ways that religion uses all this as a means of controlling people is gross and, scary to me.
treestar
(82,383 posts)But I don't think merely being raised as say a Christian is going to harm your attitude towards sex. Because a person thinks they should only do it if married doesn't mean they think it's bad when married too.
You aren't necessarily told it is bad. Just that it is "bad" to do it outside of marriage.
These people are trying to prove, I don't know, that's it's unhealthy to wait? Or not do it at all, married or not? Seems they are just as against choice as any fundie.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)as a youth or parent. I tend to think it's the extremists that lay on guilt guilt about sex, saying it's the dirtiest thing in the world and you'll go to Hell for it, but you should save it for the sanctity of marriage and the one you love.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)Many (though of course not all) Christians find value in abstaining (or trying to) until marriage, but most Christians don't take virginity pledges. That's a trait characteristic of a subset of Christianity, not the whole. I don't see the justification for treating a study about that practice as indicting Christianity or even the decision to wait.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)It's no ones business anyway.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)rules, of the books and priests of the patriarchal sky gods are not part of "humanity"?
Many of us who believe we are human, who are not controlled by the books and rules of the priests of the sky gods, are quite sure that the rules of the sky god priests concerning sex are wrong for us. Up until 500 yrs ago, the majority of people on 5 continents were unaware of the rules of the priests and books of the patriarchal sky gods.
As a matter of fact, at this very moment, many of those who claim to worship the sky gods are the ones fighting desperately to prevent some of us from getting married, and apparently believe that not letting us marry is the number one rule of their sky god.
treestar
(82,383 posts)will enjoy it to. OP subject is just intolerance the other way.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)you know, but yeah, this is BS and ultimately a "who cares?" question.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)But you do nothing to address any of the evidence in the study. Did you even bother reading it before arbitrarily rejecting it?
I call BS on you.
treestar
(82,383 posts)on subjects like this.
Like I said, people had to wait till marriage for most of history, and not everyone was messed up because of it.
Note they are assuming they've been "taught sex is wrong." Being taught it is wrong outside of marriage does not mean it is wrong in itself.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)All the evidence suggests that you are wrong. Produce something to support your assertions or everyone will disregard them because there is no reason to believe they are anything but garbage.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)have stood the world in fine stead for rather a long while now. They may not be perfect but they have gone a long way towards taking humanity out of the dark ages and into an era of rationality that has benefited the entire human race.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Oh, yeah...climate-change denialists!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)A fair while back there was the usual calm, reasoned debate here about the validity of evolutionary psychology, which at this stage is merely an interesting theory being bounced around by a few academics. I suggested that the question be given over to investigation by reputable academics using the scientific method, with their results then being subject to peer review - let the chips fall where they may. I was repeatedly told that 1) the scientific method is suspect and sometimes untrustworthy (oh really?); and 2) there are certain questions that one is never allowed to ask, period, shut up, end of discussion, except to say you are a pig for proposing such a thing even be studied seriously.
I realized how sad it all was after I stopped laughing. That attitude was the main thing that led to my taking an extended break from DU.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)poke holes in it. It becomes a very competitive situation. Some scientists love to take down attempts at research by other scientists.
If your research methodology or results don't stand up to scrutiny, the criticisms made about it are pointed and very public.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Fortunately for most people, being told they were not supposed to do something often didn't translate into them not actually doing it.
People fucked before, and outside of, marriage, a LOT before the sexual revolution. Maybe people are just more honest and less hung up about it now.
But personally, I can't imagine making what is supposed to be a lifetime commitment to and with someone else, unless we were both VERY sure we were compatible in many ways, including sexually.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)It implies the virginity pledges are the problem; but when we finally get the description of the problem, it's:
The problem is they can't talk to their wives about sexuality, and the pre-marriage men's support group has broken up. Sounds like they needed to be told it's OK, usually necessary, to talk about sex with their wives, as well as have it.
Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)I am acquainted with a 40-year-old guy who was raised as a fundamentalist and married a woman whose dad was a minister. They were married a couple of years and then divorced. He said that she had vaginismus and they only actually had sex once in those two years.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)well I seem to remember some studies in the early part of the last century on race and intelligence that where likely per reviewed . You are telling us that they where correct!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)NickB79
(19,246 posts)For most of human civilization, people were NOT the Victorian prudes we imagine them to be.
In most parts of the world, and until recently, women were typically married off as soon as they were sexually mature. Prostitution was rampant, and men were not stygmatized in the same fashion as women for sex outside of marriage. In some cultures (India, for example), young men were even encouraged to engage in homosexual relationships until they married a wife.
Puritan Christians wearing chastity belts were a small, small subset of human sexuality, not a standard.
LeftyMom
(49,212 posts)Histories from the Middle Ages are full of married people taking pledges of chastity. The church was also really uncomfortable with breastfeeding at the time, even in the absence of safe alternatives.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)No matter what some peoples' grannies may have told them.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)I wouldn't want one of those guys in bed with me.
Everyone has to learn sometime, but some things I don't have the patience to teach.
Teaching my kids how to tie their shoes was hard enough.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)It's a recipe for a life full of cognitive dissonance and double-binds. The results can range from a simple fear of sex to abusive acting-out of all kinds.
I know a man who was a victim of this kind of upbringing - his marriage was a sexual disaster zone.
I so wish the hippies had won the culture war.
valerief
(53,235 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Well done!
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)already have a problem with sex. Men who don't have problems with sex wouldn't dream about making a virginity pledge.
kath
(10,565 posts)Do they already have a problem with sex?
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)which she broke once she felt that she fell in love and thought she was ready for sex. It gives women an acceptable reason not to have sex in a society where social pressures almost demand her to do so. The pledge absolves her of negative judgment and instead can be held as a badge of honor.
Does this mean they have a problem about sex? There's a possibility but not as probable as for men since historically women's sexual liberation is relatively young and still ingrained in our social fabric.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)jmowreader
(50,559 posts)Their parents call them in and tell them, "put on your Sunday suit, we're going to a social event at the church!" When they get there, their parents, all their friends and THEIR parents, and the entire church hierarchy is standing there demanding that they swear an oath, right now, that they won't have sex until their wedding night. Let's be real: how many kids who are facing the loss of all their friends in one fell swoop - believe with all your heart that all those people would turn their backs on you if you said you weren't going to take this pledge - would say they'd rather try to have sex before marriage? When it comes to indoctrinating the young, Warsaw Pact youth groups like the Komsomol and the Free German Youth didn't have shit on American fundamentalist churches.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)...and keeps on hurting people.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)God is watching judgmentally at all times. And what about Grandma & Grandpa, who are angels watching me?
Maybe God disapproves of the fantasies running through my mind during sex? Etc., etc., which means I'll just "close my eyes and think of England"
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The warped attitudes of Xtianity towards human sexuality have poisoned two millennia.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)With a kitchen knife and then sew her back up with just a tiny hole for urine and menstruation. That's another religion...
Rape is also seen as justified in those very same cultures.
Google Image "infibulation FGM" if you want to see what a healed FGM crotch looks like. Nobody does, but I think it looks like what a female Grey Alien might look like.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Those responsible for these physical mutilations should be jailed for the rest of their days and deprogrammed back into sanity. That is unvarnished barbarism.
And that they don't do this is one of the pitifully small number of nice things you can say about the fundies.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)not interested.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)sendero
(28,552 posts)..... a son asks his dad "is sex dirty?" the father answers "only if it's done right!".
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)with the authority of Sky Daddy behind it has long term negative effects? Who could have imagined that happening?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)it is what else they were taught/believed to be true.
Atheists can choose to be celibate, if they want.
A vow of celibacy does not have to last a lifetime.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)they are told over and over that sex is bad and dirty. Then the wedding night comes along and they are filled with conflicting messages.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)BainsBane
(53,034 posts)A mercantilist view of sex.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)Tone it down, before you get Tipper Gore putting a warning label on your "joke".
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Baby gonna dress you in fancy bits of plastic
My shticky is farkin wam-dam-fam-tastic
And yo, my supply is what you would call inelastic
Wocka-wocka-wocka-PING!
Yeah Baby, i do like it sordid
Blackbeard says, prepare to be boarded
Maps of treasure, that ought to be hoarded
I gotta get it before the shit wrecks
wild turkey by twelve business days of fitz necks
Aye, matey, I gotta mercantile view of sex
Wocka-wocka-wocka-PING!
....thats all I got, so far. i dont know how pac-man and pirates got in there
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)In the 'good old days' people married young, frequently in their teens and died somewhere in their forties, or earlier. The age of first marriage keeps going up, especially with an uncertain economy.
By the way, I can relate to the OP. My grandmother tried to raise me in a fundamentalist, pentecostal church. Sadly, I took all this hell-fire-and-brimstone stuff seriously. Fortunately, I escaped in my teens (Long story!) Sadly again, much of the damage had been done.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Yeah I can see why that would cause confusion
Triple_Threat
(18 posts)locdlib
(176 posts)the woman's perspective. Even the name "virginity pledge" sounds ridiculous. http://www.yourtango.com/2014222549/i-was-virgin-until-i-got-married-and-i-regret-it
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Blue Owl
(50,393 posts)xchrom
(108,903 posts)War Horse
(931 posts)Manifestor_of_Light
(21,046 posts)I did not go to a fundamentalist church. I went to a liberal Protestant church, where you did not talk about religion outside of church. There were no sex ed classes at church.
We watched a movie in public high school with Ann Landers flapping her gums, about how "boys only want one thing" and "once they get that thing, they'll discard you like a kleenex" and valuing the girl's virginity over her personhood. Girls were not supposed to want sex or be horny. That was bad and meant you were a slut. Her advice for what to do on dates was "anything but making out." She was extremely uptight & that movie was quite harmful, but it's the standard societal bullshit we were fed at that time.
My mother ranted about how "bad things" happened to girls that were "boy crazy" without saying anything specific. I think I finally got sick of her ranting and said, "Oh, so you want me to look at girls?? Is that it??" ...crickets....
I thought, "Oh well, I'm going to hell anyway so I might as well enjoy myself." Basically, I was telling myself that those were unrealistic standards. Expecting virginity until you get a State-Approved Screwing License (A marriage certificate, not just a license) was completely unrealistic. All the old people saying that acted like they had never had a sex drive when they were young, or they had forgotten what it was like to be young and wanting sex all the time. You were supposed to wait till marriage, and then do it with one person for the rest of your life, and if you were a rich housewife like Ann Landers, you could feel smug and superior.
The whole society was into making a fetish out of virginity for the girl. If you did it before you were married, that was BAD with a capital B. There was a conspiracy of silence about sex. Nobody would tell me the facts of life. I had no idea what the boy had to do to the girl to get her pregnant. In fourth grade, we saw the movie about menstruation, but it told us nothing about men or what part they play in making a baby. They said "you're a woman now and you can have babies" with NO further explanation.
They only told us enough information to use pads so we would not leave bloody trails in the halls. We didn't have sticky back pads. We had to use those horrible elastic belts to hold the pads, and they'd bunch up. It was horrible. All that and garter belts and hose and panties (we didn't have pantyhose yet) could get complicated.
The sex ed we got in high school was misleading and non-factual. We saw a movie that implied that two virgins could get VD (now called Sexually Transmitted Disease), feel horribly guilty for 'doing it', and they implied that if you had VD, you could sneeze on somebody and they could get it, which is completely wrong. This was in 11th or 12th grade. I still don't know if the kids now in that school district get comprehensive and factual sex ed. Probably not.
There were no books that were factual sex education books that I could find in either the high school library or the public library.
The first book I read that was factual was "Everything you wanted to know about sex". It was by a psychiatrist and it was not completely factual, but it was at least some factual information. I was in the 12th grade then. I got it from my big sister's husband.
If you touched yourself, oh Lord, that was bad and you were going to hell. Sex just was not talked about. My older sister was born in '48 and she didn't know the mechanics of it until she was in high school, is what she told me.
When I was little I asked my mother why some chicken eggs turn into chickens and some don't, since we eat the ones that are not chickens. She said "I don't know." At some level I knew she was lying, that something had to happen to those chicken eggs, and I never asked her anything about sex again, because she was lying and my parents absolutely would not tell me anything and I didn't ask them.
They also lost their shit over bad words like "shit" and "fuck". You didn't DARE use those words or they would freak out.
My mom would act like a prude, like sex was dirty, and then brag about how many guys she dated in college. I suspect she was a total hypocrite about sex.
I'd say that idea that sex is dirty, and then once you get married, you're supposed to do it and enjoy it, just doesn't work. A fetishized piece of paper, that they seem to think has magic powers, is not going to change who you are on the inside.
I couldn't see why we should believe anything our parents told us because they lied about sex and lied about drugs. My parents said nothing. I'm talking about society as a whole at that time.
niyad
(113,323 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I dont know about you, but if I'd married the first person I had sex with, it would have been a clusterfuck. And not in a good way.
Oh, she's a fine human being- we're still FB friends and all, but we had little in common beyond being mutually horny teenagers.
I'm sure she feels the same, about me.
Promoting Abstinence before marriage as a moral standard that works for most people is a recipe for rushed, bad, and ultimately failed marriages.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)that people fall over to accept.
Richard Dawson said it best, "Survey Says!"
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,057 posts)Seems to me the aricle is talking about the effect of the religiosity driven initiatives, not of the pledge of virginity itself.
Hence the pledge is a symptom not the disease. The disease may be negatively impacting intimacy for some of these guys.
BTW: Even the article says that some of these programs have much higher success rates, so again, it's seems like the delivery. And the more grandstanding and religiosity based, the less likely it will work as intended.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)this and other studies are leading uo to.
"peer reviewed science articles and the gullibility of netizens. Or You can fool some of the people some of the time but if you put it on the Internet you can fool a whole lot more of them all of the time."