John Crawford's Civil Rights Were VIOLATED under the Second Amendment to the Constitution.
The cops who shot down John Crawford did so with less than ONE SECOND consideration upon encountering him.
The cops who shot down John Crawford did so under the assumption that John Crawford was armed with a loaded assault style weapon (c.f 911 call).
The cops who shot down John Crawford did so in a state where the law clearly states that anybody who may own a weapon may openly carry that weapon in public.
Second Amendment open carry activism CONSISTENTLY targets large department stores such as Wal Mart for open carry activism. These cases result in many calls to 911 that somebody is brandishing a loaded assault weapon.
John Crawford, a young black man, was not afforded the same consideration that he was simply exercising his second amendment rights as is consistently given to white open carry activists by law enforcement (I can link to hundreds of videos about such consideration, many in Ohio).
This is an open and shut civil rights case under the second amendment.
If the DOJ is smart, they'll make this a case that the NRA CANNOT ignore and MUST support. The fact that John Crawford was carrying a toy was considered to be irrelevant by the grand jury because the cops thought he had a loaded weapon. It MUST be considered irrelevant by a federal grand jury in considering the same case as a civil right violation case. The federal grand jury must approach this case as if John Crawford had a loaded AK47 in the Wal Mart that day when considering whether or not the cops violated his civil rights under the second amendment.
Take that, racist ammosexuals.
= new reply since forum marked as read
