General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLet's get one thing straight about Greenwald
Last edited Thu Oct 30, 2014, 10:15 PM - Edit history (1)
Look people, nobody hates Libertarian traitor Glenn Greenwald more than I do.
Nobody!
But as terrible as Greenwald is, at least in 2002, when any reasonable person knew in their gut that war with Iraq was necessary, a trivial-yet-profitable undertaking, Greenwald stood with reasonable Americans: he was for the thing. He's changed his mind since (which in his case is a sign of weakness while the same action is a sign of strength in better people), but for a brief moment in time, Greenwald stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the best and brightest stars of our Democratic Party.
Now let us turn to another terribly terrible traitor, Ralph Nader. A man who, need I remind you, has money in his bank account. Unlike Greenwald, Nader has NEVER been reasonable, not even once.
Never!
In fact, a movie about him is called An Unreasonable Man! A man so cut off from reason that he was always against the Iraq War, even when it was a good idea.
And so we must conclude that while Greenwald is a most worthy contender, it is Nader that has earned the title of absolute most terrible person on Earth.
QED, baby.
Regards,
Third-Way Manny
merrily
(45,251 posts)just letting it sit on the counter until the butter congeals.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)What's this, Ralph Nader?
BONUS ROUND!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)that Americans have a right to run for public office!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5737922
Has anyone told him that Hitler himself ran for office!
He must be stopped!
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)He made a perfect scapegoat so the conservatives didn't have to take responsibility for losing the presidency. The American people did not want 8 more years of Clinton via Gore, but the Democratic conservatives wouldn't listen. They made a mistake and looked for someone to blame.
Personally, I blame Sandra O'Conner who betrayed our democracy.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)jeepers
(314 posts)You forget socialist, union organizer, four time presidential candidate and convicted felon Eugene Debs. Terrible, terrible fellow he.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Hillary, a Senator and a very important public figure and who had power to change the tide of public opinion on the Iraq invasion, supported that invasion and has never repudiated that support.
Glenn Greenwald, and unknown lawyer at the time, with absolutely zero influential power, supported (with misgivings) the invasion. As did 70% of the U.S. population. Greenwald soundly repudiates his past support by writing an entire book about it.
Yay Hillary.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)the banks gambling with our money. In 2000 the Republicans stole the election and flipped off the Democrats in the process. The Democrats shrugged and collected their paychecks, happy they saved their parking spots. In 2002 Georgie Bush lied thru his teeth and still got the Democrats to kiss his behind and share responsibility for the deaths of many thousands of lives plus twist the knife in the back of our democracy.
In 2004, for the second time in a row, the Republicans stole the presidential election and once again the Democrats shrugged and turned away, I guess thinking it's all in the game.
In 2008 the American people got their hopes up for promised change. But the wealthy continue to grow wealthier while Democrats promote fracking, Free Trade, domestic spying and continuation of the 100 years Middle East War.
Now we are looking at the probability of another Clinton, another friend of Wall Street to rule in 2016.
America can't get a break.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)you really have to wonder - just whose side are they on?
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)They argue and fight among themselves but it's Kabuki Theater. A lot of Americans don't bother to vote because they don't believe it's effective. A recent Princeton study came to the same conclusion.
I still encourage everyone to vote, but we need to look for other avenues.
840high
(17,196 posts)KingCharlemagne
(7,908 posts)dsc
(52,160 posts)In 2000, when running for President he was asked about Dale vs Boy Scouts of America which was a decision which let groups that get government money and benefits discriminate against gays. It was a quite famous case at the time and any person who cared a whit about gay rights knew what it was. Nader, he hadn't heard of it, had not one flipping clue. It was his approach to civil rights issues in a nutshell. They didn't matter to him, he knew nothing about them, and it showed. He literally didn't care what would happen to gays, women, or racial minorities under a Bush Presidency. In point of fact, he figured those issues added up to no difference.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)then other issues will be solved as a natural result. Thus, he has focused on the broader agenda rather than individual issues. I don't think there is enough evidence to back up a claim that he knew "nothing" about those issues, or "literally didn't care" about them.
dsc
(52,160 posts)when there were several trees killed producing newspapers reporting on a person suing the boy scouts for discrimination is evidence of a total lack of knowledge and caring about those issues.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)would be a minority.
JI7
(89,248 posts)right up there with wingnuts who dismiss racism and sexism and claim it's about hard work.
JI7
(89,248 posts)be up to states .
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Putin is the leader of his country, for chrissakes.
He's much more powerful than Nader.
Plus, he has Snowden living in his mother country now, so he has an ace in the hole, so to speak.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)While nobody can deny that the future-Presidential-Freedom-Medal-Winner G.W. Bush is a patriot... um... well, let's just leave it at that.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Even though North Korean President Jong-un has nukes, he doesn't have his finger on the button like Putin does.
But, Jong-un makes the Top 10 list by threatening to put his finger on the button, just the same!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Nader is unsafe at any speed.
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)First Nader got close to half of those who could have voted in that election to stay at home on Election Day.
(Some people believe that many of those would be voters were caught trapped inside their seat belts, which had some Nader-installed back door computer codes, and wouldn't release the occupants until the day AFTER that election. And here all this time, the gullible among you thought Nader wanted seat belts for our safety!)
Then he fixed the vote counts so that Gore did not win, not even in his home state of Tennessee!
He also helped the Republicans who designed the ballots inside the state of Florida to make that ballot so confusing that voters there voted for Honey Boo Boo, when they simply wanted to vote for Pat Buchanan.
And you have no idea of what he has in store for us next Tuesday; I can't tell anyone until Nov 5th!
(or he will hurt my cats!)
zeemike
(18,998 posts)And now we take it global
But don't forget about Kim Jong Ung or what ever his name is in North Korea...and we have not heard much about Assad lately.
So many to hate, so little time.
Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts). . . but, he's feeling better each day!
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)marble falls
(57,080 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Democrats who voted to let Bush start it. At least some of THEM didn't change their minds, they were consistent and still are, in their support, unlike Greenwald who changed his mind just because he found out about a few the lies Bush/Cheney told. That is no reason to stop supporting them, just because they lied. It didn't stop Democrats who kept on voting to fund it, did it?
KauaiK
(544 posts)Nader believes his own PR.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)that election. George Bush's brother manipulated the vote count and the SCOTUS overstepped their authority thus violated the Constitution, and yet people want to blame Nader. Nader, who did nothing illegal and was acting within his civic duty trying to provide the American voters an alternative to the Conservatives running for the major parties. Many Americans were fed up with the New DEmocratic Clinton administration and didn't want to continue it via Gore. And remember Gore didn't need Nader's votes to beat Bush legally. Also there is no guarantee that had Nader not run, those that voted for him would have voted for Gore instead of staying home or voting for Bush. There is no guarantee that had they voted for Gore that the election wouldn't have been stolen.
The Conservative DEmocrats want to use Nader as a scapegoat to distract from their own failings.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)established under the Constitution, to run for the Presidency. How petty.
If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at ME and the rest of us who voted for Nader. I will still call you petty, because the basis for your anger is chimeric. The Democrats don't own our votes, just because we're liberals. The Democrats have to earn our votes, and if they decide to move to the center right they should not expect liberals to abandon our philosophy and follow along.
If Democrats want my vote, then they need to give me something. For example, Jeff Merkeley in Oregon has traditionally tacked left with his actions - so much so that the Oregonian withheld its endorsement because he was "too liberal" and not "bipartisan" enough. Thus, Merkeley earned my vote, because by his actions he has shown me that he is willing to get the job done for liberals.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)could you explain it to me again?
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Seriously.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Last edited Fri Oct 31, 2014, 11:42 AM - Edit history (2)
Every time you think the corporate message machine here can't get more utterly pathetic and embarrassing...
Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)and send him lots of well wishes from our great big hearts that are just so concerned, except when it comes to torture camps, health care for all, perma-war, illegal surveillance, whistle blower protections, prosecuting criminal bankers, etc...
But, but we're just so concerned; LMFAO at the frauds around the "internets".
bemildred
(90,061 posts)But I can't figure out how to pare the list down to manageable size.
LWolf
(46,179 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Thanks for that, TWM.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Autumn
(45,066 posts)These people that are for the thing must be stopped.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I admit it, I was once a part of Nader's Raiders. It was a dark time in my personal history. I campaigned, I gave money, I did anything he wanted. At that time, I was even giving to Greenpeace. I even dated an award winning journalist who was on Greenpeace ships, took photographs of the war in Afghanistan and worse yet, pictures for a book for UNICEF showing what happens to kids in war torn countries. Countries WE helped liberate.
But, you have made me see the light. I renounce all my idiocy of years past. I am no longer a Snowaldian. I stand with you!
Three-Way-Mary
Hatchling
(2,323 posts)To make a three way?
But I'll let Manny explain, if he wants to
In the mean time, can I offer you a drink?
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But I'm open to whatever.
(And if you're volunteering, you'll need to cut those nails first.)
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'm sure the kids in those books were proud... mighty proud!... to have had there lives turned to #%^* by the most moral, decent, and swell country on Earth
marym625
(17,997 posts)First, thank you again for saving me. I pray nightly to Jesus Christ in my cheese sandwich, thanking him for sending you to me.
Just look at how happy these kids are that were saved!
All Marty's photographs are copyrighted and the property of the Lueder's family
If you would like to see more of his photos, the attached link gives a short introduction to him by a prize winning journalists and links to Marty's photos
http://www.franksmyth.com/colleagues-corner/martin-lueders/
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)was "Jerry F." He's the kid at the grocery store who always puts my bread and eggs on the bottom of the bag.
randys1
(16,286 posts)and shutting down the government for maybe months resulting in tremendous harm, maybe death?
?