General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“Why did you draw your gun?” How the law encourages police brutality
This article by Joshua Michtom effectively examines the history of Supreme Court decisions that have resulted in the situation young black men face in America when confronted by police. One conclusion, with which I agree, is that our current problems with police violence are a result of deeply ingrained cultural racial attitudes being mirrored in faulty training doctrine.
http://www.salon.com/2014/10/31/why_did_you_draw_your_gun%E2%80%9D_how_the_law_encourages_police_brutality/
...
Heres the problem: while police work often entails great courage, the assumption that police work is especially dangerous is not necessarily supported by the numbers. On-the-job police fatalities are statistically rare; the profession does not rank among the nations most dangerous in this regard. Despite the notion often voiced by defenders of police accused of using excessive force that cops must be eternally vigilant against assailants who will grab their weapons, that basically never happens.
Of the roughly 780,000 law enforcement officers in the United States, 105 died in the line of duty in 2013, and 30 of those were from hostile gunfire of any kind (including, presumably, incidents involving their own service weapons). A thorough analysis by Professor Stoughton revealed that police interactions with civilians are almost never tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving, as the Supreme Court described them in Graham v. Connor.
In the Tulane Law Review, Stoughton writes, in 2008, officers used or threatened force in less than 2% of approximately forty million civilian interactions. And even the Supreme Courts theory that automobile stops are especially dangerous for cops crumbles under scrutiny: In Robinson and Mimms, the high court relied on a single study that indicated that 30% of incidents where cops were shot began with traffic stops (the NHTSA offers the even higher rate of more than half). As any student of basic statistics will tell you, that figure reveals almost nothing about how dangerous traffic stops are. (There could be three million traffic stops, only three of which resulted in officers being shot, and the statistic would still hold true as long as seven officers were shot in other types of encounters). A 2001 review of ten years of national traffic stop data in the Journal of Criminal Justice estimated the risk of a police fatality during a traffic stop at between 1 in 6.7 million and 1 in 20.1 million.
Why, in the face of these data, does police training continue to tell officers that they are targets? And why do courts continue blithely to ratify this view, holding cops blameless for conduct that would get most of us charged with a felony? The answer is in another set of data: Studies and polls routinely show that white Americans, and the American public in general, perceive black people to be more violent than other groups and more prone to drug abuse, although neither of those assertions is demonstrably true. Americans generally overestimate the percentage of violent crimes attributable to blacks.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)and then later he writes
in 2008, officers used or threatened force in less than 2% of approximately forty million civilian interactions.
so 40,000,000 interactions
less than 2% where force was used or threatened.
2%!!! So clearly we have a huge problem here. Actually less than 2%
But that is still 800,000 instances where force is either used or threatened.
With 400 deaths by police that is still only a 1 in 100,000 chance. Not to mention that almost all of the people killed by the cops probably did something wrong - like shooting at the police first.