General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren: It’s time to work on America’s agenda
There have been terrible, horrible, no good, very bad Election Days for Democrats before and Republicans have had a few of those, too. Such days are always followed by plenty of pronouncements about what just changed and whats going to be different going forward.
But for all the talk of change in Washington and in states where one party is taking over from another, one thing has not changed: The stock market and gross domestic product keep going up, while families are getting squeezed hard by an economy that isnt working for them.
The solution to this isnt a basket of quickly passed laws designed to prove Congress can do something anything. The solution isnt for the president to cut deals any deals just to show he can do business. The solution requires an honest recognition of the kind of changes needed if families are going to get a shot at building a secure future.
Its not about big government or small government. Its not the size of government that worries people; rather its deep-down concern over who government works for. People are ready to work, ready to do their part, ready to fight for their futures and their kids futures, but they see a government that bows and scrapes for big corporations, big banks, big oil companies and big political donors and they know this government does not work for them.
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/elizabeth-warren-its-time-to-work-on-americas-agenda/2014/11/07/984da7b6-669c-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I hope that her incessant aptness never becomes boring.
BTW, welcome back from your hiatus, I missed you! I hope everything is well.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Love how Warren doesn't mince words and gets to the point....
Martin Eden
(12,869 posts)BEFORE the election.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)The Clinton style Dems no doubt despise the ilk of an Elizabeth Warren. In fact, I believe I read somewhere on here or some other blog that the third-way types are gearing up to purge Warren types from the party. OK, I checked before posting...it was Papantonio...here's the link:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017225351
Martin Eden
(12,869 posts)The difference is growing, which is a big reason so many Dem politicians lost.
And that is why the Democratic Party needs to be reformed from the bottom up. The People need more Elizabeth Warrens, not fewer.
sorechasm
(631 posts)But the lobbyists agenda is not Americas agenda. Americans are deeply suspicious of trade deals negotiated in secret, with chief executives invited into the room while the workers whose jobs are on the line are locked outside. They have been burned enough times on tax deals that carefully protect the tender fannies of billionaires and big oil and other big political donors, while working families just get hammered. They are appalled by Wall Street banks that got taxpayer bailouts and now whine that the laws are too tough, even as they rake in billions in profits. If cutting deals means helping big corporations, Wall Street banks and the already-powerful, that isnt a victory for the American people its just another round of the same old rigged game.
On the other hand, Hillary will only drive Republicans to the polls.
olegramps
(8,200 posts)Sen. Sanders summed it up when he said the Democrats are totally in the pay of the corporate interest and will not campaign on the issues that affect working class Americans because the fear the loss of the corporate campaign contributions. These include higher tax on the ultra-wealthy, closing loop hole on corporate taxes, stopping outsourcing, the minimum wage, etc. etc. etc. We all know the issues, we just need Democratic candidates that are willing to address these basic issues then you will see them at the poles. I would go as far as saying the basic working class Republican is an ignoramus that can't even grasp the fact that they are digging their own economic grave, so forget about trying to convert them and just concentrate on the key issues rather than kissing the corporate masters ass to get donations.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)i wonder what percentage of Americans know what she's talking about? Probably single digits because NO ONE in the media talks about TPP.
Now a very high profile politician is talking about it, I wonder how long the media can keep the lid on it?
Notice that by saying this she is running against an Obama policy. Pretty interesting, isn't it? Something the media might highlight? But will they? They seem to be bending over backwards not to talk about already, they'll just bend some more. Here is hoping she pushes the issue.
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)are just the liberal whip cream used to top a cake of Democratic GOP-lite
corporate centrists who are just as beholden to big corporations as the GOP.
It's all about campaign cash. Citizens United tilted the table and made non-corporate
parties, as if there are any, powerless.
Bland moderate clones didn't energize the Democratic base. Using an appearance
by a liberal star may draw a crowd, but it didn't change the candidate or appeal
to registered Democrats who are not active. The appearance probably did more
to alarm the GOP base!
Liberal issues won at the ballot box, the handful of liberal candidates NH CT PA
won.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)baldguy
(36,649 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They believe they are the future because they can raise more from Wall Street.
baldguy
(36,649 posts)That's one of the many reasons she supports Hillary running in 2016.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Someone is going to feel the need to sit her down and explain "how it works".
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)with a stick. Her enemies are the Conservative DEmocrats that work for the Oligarchy.
Wouldn't it be wonderful if all Democrats were working for the people, but they aren't. Some Democrats are working for the 1%.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)A lot of the democrats agenda is being passed at the state level by ballot initiatives w/o it being closely identified with the party.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)even more than the past four years, since they have the Senate, too.
True Blue Door
(2,969 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)confuses me. That said,
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)I think she would make a fine president, if she were to be elected, but no matter how good a person intensions are when getting the job of president, they can do very little by themselves, and without a congress that will support these kind sod ideas, nothing will happen. That has been proven by the current crop of republicans in congress right now. From day one of the Obama administration, they have done nothing to help this country move ahead, they have only obstructed every plan the president has had. Does anyone think that would change just because we put a new democratic president in the WH?
We have to remove the obstacles that are preventing real changes, and that mesa getting rid of the republican control of both the House and the Senate. It also means getting democrats elected that will work with the president also. Until congress changes, nothing else will change.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)Those new Democratic libertarians, and on impeachment Liz will vote with the Republicans.
All this stuff she promotes is safe and will all be eliminated, government student loans, consume finance protections, tax laws.
All safe topics for her because they are all on the kill the policy list.
She talks income inequality but does not push for minimum wage increase. If she promotes earned income credit you must at least that is the Ford Adm. plan where the 99% percent subsidizes the lowest paying employers, like WalMart.
think
(11,641 posts)March 25, 2014
By Sen. Elizabeth Warren
I have 17 million reasons for wanting to increase the minimum wage. Yes, 17 millionthe number of children whose lives would be a little more secure if their moms and dads earned at least $10.10 an hour.
When I was in junior high, my daddy had a heart attack. He was home for a while, the medical bills piled up, and we lost our family station wagon.
So my mother did what she had to do: She went to work answering the phones at Sears. The job paid only minimum wage, but it was enough to make sure we could keep our home.
No one should work full time and live in poverty. In 1968, the minimum wage was high enough to keep a family of three out of poverty. In 1980, the minimum wage was at least high enough to keep a family of two out of poverty. Today, the minimum wage leaves a working parent with one child in poverty. This is fundamentally wrong....
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/17-million-reasons-raise-minimum-wage/story?id=23054905
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)I expect that she would claim, now is not the right time. I find her unbelievable.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)Now it's "Well she pushes but only because it will never come up for a vote"
I find her to be one of maybe 10 politicians that are actually worth a shit.
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)PAProgressive28
(270 posts)You also said there she would vote for impeaching Obama
Todays_Illusion
(1,209 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Get the dark money out of the elections!
Have you signed the petition or checked out the progress and news on Move To Amend?
http://www.MoveToAmend.org
Kath1
(4,309 posts)She speaks the truth.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)That's a ticket I would campaign for in a heartbeat.