Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PAProgressive28

(270 posts)
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 02:00 PM Nov 2014

Warren: Solution isn’t for the President to cut deals, any deals, just to show he can do business

Warren's op-ed in the Washington Post today:

There have been terrible, horrible, no good, very bad Election Days for Democrats before -- and Republicans have had a few of those, too. Such days are always followed by plenty of pronouncements about what just changed and what’s going to be different going forward.

But for all the talk of change in Washington and in states where one party is taking over from another, one thing has not changed: The stock market and gross domestic product keep going up, while families are getting squeezed hard by an economy that isn’t working for them.

The solution to this isn’t a basket of quickly passed laws designed to prove Congress can do something -- anything. The solution isn’t for the president to cut deals -- any deals -- just to show he can do business. The solution requires an honest recognition of the kind of changes needed if families are going to get a shot at building a secure future.

It’s not about big government or small government. It’s not the size of government that worries people; rather it’s deep-down concern over who government works for. People are ready to work, ready to do their part, ready to fight for their futures and their kids’ futures, but they see a government that bows and scrapes for big corporations, big banks, big oil companies and big political donors -- and they know this government does not work for them.

The American people want a fighting chance to build better lives for their families. They want a government that will stand up to the big banks when they break the law. A government that helps out students who are getting crushed by debt. A government that will protect and expand Social Security for our seniors and raise the minimum wage.

Americans understand that building a prosperous future isn’t free. They want us to invest carefully and prudently, sharply aware that Congress spends the people’s money. They want us to make investments that will pay off in their lives, investments in the roads and power grids that make it easier for businesses to create good jobs here in America, investments in medical and scientific research that spur new discoveries and economic growth, and investments in educating our children so they can build a future for themselves and their children.

Before leaders in Congress and the president get caught up in proving they can pass some new laws, everyone should take a skeptical look at whom those new laws will serve. At this very minute, lobbyists and lawyers are lining up by the thousands to push for new laws -- laws that will help their rich and powerful clients get richer and more powerful. Hoping to catch a wave of dealmaking, these lobbyists and lawyers -- and their well-heeled clients -- are looking for the chance to rig the game just a little more.

But the lobbyists’ agenda is not America’s agenda. Americans are deeply suspicious of trade deals negotiated in secret, with chief executives invited into the room while the workers whose jobs are on the line are locked outside. They have been burned enough times on tax deals that carefully protect the tender fannies of billionaires and big oil and other big political donors, while working families just get hammered. They are appalled by Wall Street banks that got taxpayer bailouts and now whine that the laws are too tough, even as they rake in billions in profits. If cutting deals means helping big corporations, Wall Street banks and the already-powerful, that isn’t a victory for the American people -- it’s just another round of the same old rigged game.

Yes, we need action. But action must be focused in the right place: on ending tax laws riddled with loopholes that favor giant corporations, on breaking up the financial institutions that continue to threaten our economy, and on giving people struggling with high-interest student loans the same chance to refinance their debt that every Wall Street corporation enjoys. There’s no shortage of work that Congress can do, but the agenda shouldn’t be drawn up by a bunch of corporate lobbyists and lawyers.

Change is hard, especially when the playing field is already tilted so far in favor of those with money and influence. But this government belongs to the American people, and it’s time to work on America’s agenda. America is ready -- and Congress should be ready, too.

Thank you for being a part of this,

Elizabeth

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/elizabeth-warren-its-time-to-work-on-americas-agenda/2014/11/07/984da7b6-669c-11e4-9fdc-d43b053ecb4d_story.html

Hits the nail on the head as usual
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren: Solution isn’t for the President to cut deals, any deals, just to show he can do business (Original Post) PAProgressive28 Nov 2014 OP
It is now and always has been simple. Half-Century Man Nov 2014 #1
The emphasis should always be on the "General Welfare". Enthusiast Nov 2014 #2
Not strong enough. Half-Century Man Nov 2014 #5
5 stars BlancheSplanchnik Nov 2014 #3
She's been in town for all of 2 weeks, yet now she knows what is wrong with the bus schedules. Major Hogwash Nov 2014 #4
Your sarcasm comes across as hateful, kind of like a Republican. Maineman Nov 2014 #11
Then why is he working so hard... awoke_in_2003 Nov 2014 #13
- crickets - grahamhgreen Nov 2014 #15
Because Obama WANTS the TPP, and Keystone XL Pipeline, and turning SS over to Wall Street, and blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #17
Why are you Dem-bashing? nt Union Scribe Nov 2014 #21
"He can veto anything they send to him..." CrispyQ Nov 2014 #32
Senator Warren cuts to the chase. 99Forever Nov 2014 #6
Yay, "bi-partisanship"!!! 11 Dimensional Chess!!! Rope-a-dope!!! blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #18
LIZ FOR PRESIDENT!!! Odin2005 Nov 2014 #7
It’s not the size of government that worries people; it’s who government works for. Beartracks Nov 2014 #8
Warren for President, 2016! (nt) NYC_SKP Nov 2014 #9
Amen! Wonderful op-ed! RufusTFirefly Nov 2014 #10
kick, kick, kick, kick... scarletwoman Nov 2014 #12
I agree with her on that... kentuck Nov 2014 #14
I can only hope she runs for President. blackspade Nov 2014 #16
The Third Way/DLC crowd will NEVER have any of that. No way, no how. blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #19
The Third Way is mostly investment bankers, fake Democrats. Maineman Nov 2014 #22
k/r +320 million nationalize the fed Nov 2014 #20
VERY well said. LuvNewcastle Nov 2014 #23
This is Presidential material Wella Nov 2014 #24
How is blaming Obama going to help her? ucrdem Nov 2014 #25
Those like Alison Grimes ran against Obama for not being Republican™ enough. That's the difference. Electric Monk Nov 2014 #26
I read it as a pot shot. ucrdem Nov 2014 #27
I think your over reading her statement. blackspade Nov 2014 #29
Tell it Sister! From the Halls of Congress to the PEOPLE all over this land. WARREN 2016. appalachiablue Nov 2014 #28
K & R ctsnowman Nov 2014 #30
PLEASE run for president!!!! Takket Nov 2014 #31
When you hear about Americans fed up with their politicians, this is what it means: LuckyLib Nov 2014 #33

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
1. It is now and always has been simple.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 02:37 PM
Nov 2014

The wants of the few should never outweigh the needs of the many.
We band together to provide the best existence of the most of us as possible, or say it briefly; Civilization.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
2. The emphasis should always be on the "General Welfare".
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:09 PM
Nov 2014

Not on the welfare of the wealthy, powerful, connected.

Half-Century Man

(5,279 posts)
5. Not strong enough.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:45 PM
Nov 2014

No one NEEDS a billion dollars, but you can get it by taking from a huge mass of others, thus removing their ability to buy food.

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
4. She's been in town for all of 2 weeks, yet now she knows what is wrong with the bus schedules.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:44 PM
Nov 2014

The President isn't going to make any deals that he doesn't think will work for the betterment of this country.
If Warren has a problem with that, she can whine to Obama about it.

President Obama doesn't have to sign any bills that the Republicans send to him from Capitol Hill.
He can veto them and then say, "we can do better than this."
He can veto anything they send to him and then say they don't meet his standard.
He can be a perfectionist, and if the bill doesn't meet all of his criteria, every little thing, he can veto the bill, and say, "naw, this isn't exactly what I want."
He can do that until someone else is in the White House.




 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
17. Because Obama WANTS the TPP, and Keystone XL Pipeline, and turning SS over to Wall Street, and
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:41 AM
Nov 2014

destroying Workers Unions, and destroying our Public Schools, and increasing the reach and force of the Surveillance Police State, and paying mere Lip Service to the Party Platform, and ...

CrispyQ

(36,470 posts)
32. "He can veto anything they send to him..."
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:08 PM
Nov 2014

This president?



The next two years, we are going to find out just what kind of democrat Barack Obama is.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
6. Senator Warren cuts to the chase.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:51 PM
Nov 2014

Unfortunately, I doubt Obama will take her sage advice. We are about to have a massive load of ugly shoved down our throats.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
18. Yay, "bi-partisanship"!!! 11 Dimensional Chess!!! Rope-a-dope!!!
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:42 AM
Nov 2014
Obama's got the Republicans right where he wants them ... in full CONtrol of CONgress.

Beartracks

(12,814 posts)
8. It’s not the size of government that worries people; it’s who government works for.
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 03:57 PM
Nov 2014

Right on, Ms. Warren!

Republicans claim the size of government can be "too big" but even THEY aren't interested in making government smaller in total; rather, they're only interested in blatantly shrinking those parts of the government that don't serve corporate interests.

===========================

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
10. Amen! Wonderful op-ed!
Sat Nov 8, 2014, 04:46 PM
Nov 2014

I love the way the messages that Warren conveys are always thoughtful and intelligent yet still manage to be simple and inspiring.


"We have to run people who love money too much out of politics, they’re a danger in politics… People who love money should dedicate themselves to industry, to commerce, to multiply wealth. But politics is the struggle for the happiness of all.” -- Uruguayan President José Mujica

Maineman

(854 posts)
22. The Third Way is mostly investment bankers, fake Democrats.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 01:14 AM
Nov 2014

One prong of a two pronged approach to support right wing agenda.

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
20. k/r +320 million
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 12:50 AM
Nov 2014


Yes, we need action. But action must be focused in the right place: on ending tax laws riddled with loopholes that favor giant corporations, on breaking up the financial institutions that continue to threaten our economy, and on giving people struggling with high-interest student loans the same chance to refinance their debt that every Wall Street corporation enjoys. There’s no shortage of work that Congress can do, but the agenda shouldn’t be drawn up by a bunch of corporate lobbyists and lawyers.

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
26. Those like Alison Grimes ran against Obama for not being Republican™ enough. That's the difference.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 02:16 AM
Nov 2014

Run like a real Dem™, like Alan Greyson, Keith Boykin, Al Franken, or Liz Warren, and it's been shown voters (in states that aren't completely crazy) will vote for the real Dem when given a real choice, instead of choosing Republican Lite.

That's the difference. That's the lesson to be learned here, imho.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
27. I read it as a pot shot.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 02:22 AM
Nov 2014
"The solution isn’t for the president to cut deals -- any deals -- just to show he can do business."

That's a total misreading of Obama's post-election news conference, which I listened to. Obama made no such promises, predictions, or suggestions. He simply said he was going to listen to what the country's newly elected government has to say. For Warren to score points in this way, which is about all I ever read about her doing on DU, strikes me as poor strategy if she's running for national office, as this op-ed strongly suggests she is.

JMHO, YMMV.

LuckyLib

(6,819 posts)
33. When you hear about Americans fed up with their politicians, this is what it means:
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 01:49 PM
Nov 2014

"People are ready to work, ready to do their part, ready to fight for their futures and their kids’ futures, but they see a government that bows and scrapes for big corporations, big banks, big oil companies and big political donors -- and they know this government does not work for them."

You tell it, sister!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren: Solution isn’t fo...