Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJenny McCarthy’s new war on science: Vaccines, autism and the media’s shame
The vaccine/autism conversation has been abetted by a media determined to pose everything as a conflict
by Elena Conis for salon.com
Jenny McCarthy on "The View" (Credit: ABC)
Autism reporting and mother warriors
The IOM committee took on the feared link between MMR vaccine and autism as its first order of business, convening a meeting in March 2001 and releasing its conclusions a month later. Looking closely at the existing research, the scientists on the panel didnt find much to implicate the MMR vaccine, but they did find much to exonerate it. To begin with, the MMR vaccine was licensed long before prevalence of autism spectrum disorders began to climb. Eight different epidemiological studies showed no association between MMR vaccination and autism. These studies didnt definitively disprove a causal relationship, but at the same time, the single study suggesting a link between vaccines and autismWakefields studyfailed to prove a causal relationship. Epidemiological evidence aside, there was also no good biological model to explain how MMR vaccines could contribute to autism, in either lab animals or humans. The likelihood of a causal relationship, the committee concluded, seemed remote.
In 2004 the IOM committee revisited the connection between vaccines and autism, in order to take into account the most recent research. This time, they reported that they had found no support for a causal relationship between the two. Media reports had adopted a reassuring tone when the IOM released its 2001 report: Parents worried about the potential links between one of the most common [vaccines] and autism can rest easier tonight, said network news anchor Tom Brokaw. But the tone of media reports on the occasion of the IOMs 2004 findings reflected a noteworthy shift. Some reports were defensive. On 60 Minutes, CDC immunization adviser and pediatric infectious disease specialist Paul Offit not only disputed the vaccine-autism link; he emphasized that vaccines were without question, the safest, best-tested thing we put into our bodies. . . . [T]hey have a better safety record than vitamins, a better safety record than cough-and-cold preparations, a better safety record than antibiotics. Still other reports suggested that scientific assurances were now beside the point. While scientists say its clear that vaccines dont cause autism, said NBC news reporter Robert Bazell, for some parents, the doubts will always linger. Scientific conclusions, reassuring in 2001, were now no salve for parental fears. The vaccine-autism story, clearly, would not be put to rest. In fact, it only became more prevalent as the decade progressed. U.S. newspapers mentioned the link four hundred times in 2001 and more than three thousand times in 2009. And there were five times the number of evening news stories on the link in 2010 than there had been in 2001.
http://www.salon.com/2014/11/08/jenny_mccarthys_new_war_on_science_vaccines_autism_and_the_medias_shame/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
by Elena Conis for salon.com
Jenny McCarthy on "The View" (Credit: ABC)
Autism reporting and mother warriors
The IOM committee took on the feared link between MMR vaccine and autism as its first order of business, convening a meeting in March 2001 and releasing its conclusions a month later. Looking closely at the existing research, the scientists on the panel didnt find much to implicate the MMR vaccine, but they did find much to exonerate it. To begin with, the MMR vaccine was licensed long before prevalence of autism spectrum disorders began to climb. Eight different epidemiological studies showed no association between MMR vaccination and autism. These studies didnt definitively disprove a causal relationship, but at the same time, the single study suggesting a link between vaccines and autismWakefields studyfailed to prove a causal relationship. Epidemiological evidence aside, there was also no good biological model to explain how MMR vaccines could contribute to autism, in either lab animals or humans. The likelihood of a causal relationship, the committee concluded, seemed remote.
In 2004 the IOM committee revisited the connection between vaccines and autism, in order to take into account the most recent research. This time, they reported that they had found no support for a causal relationship between the two. Media reports had adopted a reassuring tone when the IOM released its 2001 report: Parents worried about the potential links between one of the most common [vaccines] and autism can rest easier tonight, said network news anchor Tom Brokaw. But the tone of media reports on the occasion of the IOMs 2004 findings reflected a noteworthy shift. Some reports were defensive. On 60 Minutes, CDC immunization adviser and pediatric infectious disease specialist Paul Offit not only disputed the vaccine-autism link; he emphasized that vaccines were without question, the safest, best-tested thing we put into our bodies. . . . [T]hey have a better safety record than vitamins, a better safety record than cough-and-cold preparations, a better safety record than antibiotics. Still other reports suggested that scientific assurances were now beside the point. While scientists say its clear that vaccines dont cause autism, said NBC news reporter Robert Bazell, for some parents, the doubts will always linger. Scientific conclusions, reassuring in 2001, were now no salve for parental fears. The vaccine-autism story, clearly, would not be put to rest. In fact, it only became more prevalent as the decade progressed. U.S. newspapers mentioned the link four hundred times in 2001 and more than three thousand times in 2009. And there were five times the number of evening news stories on the link in 2010 than there had been in 2001.
http://www.salon.com/2014/11/08/jenny_mccarthys_new_war_on_science_vaccines_autism_and_the_medias_shame/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1020 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jenny McCarthy’s new war on science: Vaccines, autism and the media’s shame (Original Post)
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2014
OP
Chemisse
(30,813 posts)1. Interesting article.
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)2. Didn't Jenny McCarthy drop this a few years ago?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)3. She won't ever be allowed to drop it. And that's a good thing. nt
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)4. I hate this woman with every fiber of my being.
spanone
(135,838 posts)5. stupid gets equal billing with science is americaland