Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Republican Official Censors Student Newspaper Because It Covered A Democratic Senator’s Campaign
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/10/22/3582703/republican-official-censors-student-newspaper-because-it-covered-a-democratic-senators-campaign/A Republican official in the county that includes Colorado State University reportedly threatened to confiscate copies of a student newspaper that were available in newspaper racks at the university’s student center because she claimed that they violate a state law prohibiting “electioneering . . . within one hundred feet of any building in which a polling location is located.” Larimer County Clerk and Recorder Angela Myers objected to the newspapers because of their front page coverage of Sen. Mark Udall’s (D-CO) visit to the university’s campus....
Myers’ attempt to censor the Rocky Mountain Collegian occurred on Tuesday morning. On Tuesday afternoon, after she received a cease an desist letter from an attorney representing the paper, she reversed her decision and permitted the papers to be displayed.
Myers claimed that the papers must be censored because “[w]hen you have a paper that has a candidate on the very front like it does, we will need that to be displayed outside the 100-foot limit,” but this claim is difficult to square with the law she cites to justify removing the paper. Although the law at issue does indeed ban electioneering close to a polling location, it defines the term “electioneering” as “campaigning for or against any candidate who is on the ballot or any ballot issue or ballot question that is on the ballot” or “soliciting signatures for a candidate petition, a recall petition, or a petition to place a ballot issue or ballot question on a subsequent ballot.”
The censored newspaper did neither of these things. It published reporting of a newsworthy event that happened to involve a candidate for public office. Though the paper’s coverage does quote statements Udall make while speaking on campus, it neither expresses a viewpoint for or against his campaign nor does it solicit signatures of any kind.
Myers’ attempt to censor the Rocky Mountain Collegian occurred on Tuesday morning. On Tuesday afternoon, after she received a cease an desist letter from an attorney representing the paper, she reversed her decision and permitted the papers to be displayed.
Myers claimed that the papers must be censored because “[w]hen you have a paper that has a candidate on the very front like it does, we will need that to be displayed outside the 100-foot limit,” but this claim is difficult to square with the law she cites to justify removing the paper. Although the law at issue does indeed ban electioneering close to a polling location, it defines the term “electioneering” as “campaigning for or against any candidate who is on the ballot or any ballot issue or ballot question that is on the ballot” or “soliciting signatures for a candidate petition, a recall petition, or a petition to place a ballot issue or ballot question on a subsequent ballot.”
The censored newspaper did neither of these things. It published reporting of a newsworthy event that happened to involve a candidate for public office. Though the paper’s coverage does quote statements Udall make while speaking on campus, it neither expresses a viewpoint for or against his campaign nor does it solicit signatures of any kind.
Was that enough to sink Udall, along with all the vote suppression?!
