Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
"In a private club 54 floors above the convention hall they monitored the party they infiltrated."
That sentence is from an article below about the 2000 Democratic convention, and the power the DLC had over it.
This is just my opinion, but I believe the Tea Party extremists gained power because our side was too busy listening to the calls for "bipartisanship" coming from the policy think tanks. The Republicans didn't fight them because they needed to win and used whatever was needed to do so.
So in effect both sides moved right. The GOP moved right out of conviction. The Democrats moved right for two reasons. They feared the media machine formed by the Republicans, and they took the advice of corporately funded think tanks.
Behind the DLC Takeover
By John Nichols
At the national convention of a major political party, an ideologically rigid sectarian clique secures the ultimate triumph. It inserts two of its own as nominees for the Presidency and the Vice Presidency. Heavily financed by the most powerful corporations in the world, the group's leaders gather in a private club fifty-four floors above the convention hall, apart from the delegates of the party they had infiltrated. There, they carefully monitor the convention's acceptance of a platform the organization had drafted almost in its entirety. Then, with the ticket secured and with the policy course of the party set, they introduce a team of 100 shock troops to deploy across the country to lock up the party's grassroots.
This is not some fantastic political thriller starring Harrison Ford or Sharon Stone. This is the real-life version of Invasion of the Party Snatchers--with the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) burrowing into the pod that is the Democratic Party.
Founded in the mid-1980s with essentially the same purpose as the Christian Coalition--to pull a broad political party dramatically to the right--the DLC has been far more successful than its headline-grabbing Republican counterpart. After Walter Mondale's 1984 defeat at the hands of Ronald Reagan, a group of mostly Southern, conservative Democrats hatched the theory that their party was in trouble because it had grown too sympathetic to the agendas of organized labor, feminists, African Americans, Latinos, gays and lesbians, peace activists, and egalitarians.
....A day is soon coming when "we'll finally be able to proclaim that all Democrats are, indeed, New Democrats," declared DLC President Al From on the eve of this year's Democratic National Convention.
After every success we have as Democrats all kind of op eds appear, saying that we need to be careful as a majority not to leave the other side out of discussions. That's fine and good, but not practical when the other side are extremists.
It used to be the Democratic Leadership Council guiding the steps of our party, but in 2011 Fox Democrat Kirsten Powers let us know that Third Way was taking their place.
From her column at the Daily Beast:
DLC Shut Down: The Democrats’ New Power Base
Reports of the death of centrism in the Democratic Party have been greatly exaggerated.
Monday’s news that the Democratic Leadership Council is folding after three decades was greeted with glee by those on the left who see it as evidence that centrism has gasped its last breath.
.."The truth is, the DLC’s position as the leading centrist Democratic think tank was long ago overtaken by a group called Third Way, which has been growing more influential by the day.
Before joining the White House, Bill Daley, President Obama’s new chief of staff, was a board member of Third Way.
I found an opinion piece written in 1995 by the present head of the Third Way. He was calling on Democrats to privatize Social Security for everyone but the very needy.
Pure gold from 1995. Op ed from Third Way prez Cowan calling to privatize Social Security.
The time has come to reinvent Social Security based on a "cut and privatize" approach that will be fair to all age groups. This reinvention should be based on three principles:
Start immediately to lower boomers' expectations of the returns they will get and encourage them to increase private savings.
Separate out the welfare portion of Social Security and pay out poverty benefits to today's--and tomorrow's--needy seniors from general government revenues.
Idea #3 is to lower the Social Security payroll to 10% (where the heck was it in 1995...isn't it 6.2 now?) and "give workers the option of putting their money into private pension programs that offer far higher returns and sounder prospects than today's Social Security system."
Some quotes from those who have warned the party to include the left and behave like Democrats.
False centrism and the rush to "bipartisanship". They are failing our party. Some quotes.
I still quote Howard Dean now and then. I stopped for a while because I believe he stepped back a while from telling things straight and clear. Hopefully he will again.
From June 2010:
"You did your job," Dean added. "You elected Barack Obama. You elected a Democratic Congress. You elected a Democratic Senate. And now it's time for them to behave like Democrats if they want to get reelected. They have forgotten where they came from -- and they haven't been here that long."
Dean echoed other progressive leaders who opened the conference Monday, expressing dismay, even anger, at the White House and Congress, saying they have been too timid and compromising on issues such as health care, the economy, climate change and banking reform.
Dean said the progressive base is critical to Democrats' electoral successes this fall and beyond. "If Washington understands that they can't do things that demoralize their base," Dean said, "then we'll have a permanent (Democratic) majority."
It proved to be true about needing the progressive base in 2010.
R. J. Eskow's masterpiece just after the 2010 midterms was clear.
After last night's rout, what are these experts advising? You guessed it: more of the same so-called "Centrism." That's an odd word to use for policies that most Americans oppose, like cutting Social Security or allowing bankers to enrich themselves by endangering the economy, but theirs is an Alice-in-Wonderland world.
Real centrists would defend Social Security and do more to rein in Wall Street, since those positions are popular across the political spectrum. It's a good thing the president said today that he wants to spend more time with the American people. Bankers and the Deficit Commission aren't "centrists" where most Americans live.
Robert Reich has a frank and open interview with Speigel Online.
SPIEGEL ONLINE: When you served in the White House, President Bill Clinton began on the left but drifted to the middle after the Democrats lost significant ground in the mid-term elections. Do you see that happening again?
Reich: I was there with Bill Clinton when he tried to so called "triangulate" and please the voters in the middle. But the middle is a fiction. The middle is simply where most voters who respond to surveys say they are. What Clinton did and what Obama may be forced to do is to give up leadership; that is, to simply respond to polls. I think it would be a shame if Obama moved from leadership to opinion polls, but his advisors may feel that that's the only way to guarantee him a re-election.
There are good ideas there at the Third Way in some cases. They are usually geared to the business community. That group often speaks of the left in not so friendly terms.
Simon Rosenberg, a co-founder of the DLC gave away their game and left no doubt. He spoke of why the DLC was founded. The article was in The American Prospect, and the actual link is hard to keep up with. Here is his quote:
"freed... from positions making it difficult for us to win. "...Simon Rosenberg.
"Simon Rosenberg, the former field director for the DLC who directs the New Democrat Network, a spin-off political action committee, says, "We're trying to raise money to help them lessen their reliance on traditional interest groups in the Democratic Party. In that way," he adds, "they are ideologically freed, frankly, from taking positions that make it difficult for Democrats to win."
Now I believe we are looking at the XL pipeline being okayed, the safety nets cut for seniors, schools finally privatized, more troops sent to our wars around the world.
A country is not healthy without an opposition party. We had a chance to be one, and I think we failed too often.
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
ONE. Bernie Sanders.
Makes me want to start drinking in the morning.
Much agree. 
I got your point, but it wasn't funny enough to laugh about. 
nothing wrong with that. 
Poor fella is running on empty now. All he can do is compare DU to Rush now... 
over the years.
but the goals were the same. They did not want to need the left wing of the party.
Yes, it is mostly name only now.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/10/democratic-party-moderates-111770.html
These 2 paragraphs stand out and just about define the whole article.
Thanks for mentioning that article. I consider myself part of the "liberal groupthink" he so insultingly refers to.
These 2 paragraphs stand out and just about define the whole article.
The Muzzled Center.
Unfortunately, such problem-solving pragmatism is currently out of fashion. Actually, it’s worse than that: Politicians who try to break the partisan impasse risk self-immolation. A Republican who reaches out to Democrats on immigration or some other highly charged issue risks being “primaried” and mauled by political goon squads with gobs of money, like the Club for Growth, Americans for Prosperity and Heritage Action. When even powerful GOP leaders like Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor are attacked by the right as squishes, you know the conservative revolution has begun to devour its own.
Pressure to conform is mounting on the other side, too. An array of powerful interest groups, plus self-appointed ideological minders like MoveOn and the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, are quick to pounce on Democrats who deviate from leftish orthodoxy by, say, supporting trade agreements, real accountability in education, changes in entitlements, development of America’s shale-gas windfall and efforts to lower regulatory obstacles to entrepreneurship. The wealthy liberals of the Democracy Alliance aren’t investing in new ideas; they are building a “progressive infrastructure” by lavishing money on think tanks and advocacy groups that think exactly as they do. The result is a liberal groupthink that stands guard over the programmatic status quo and stifles public innovation
Thanks for mentioning that article. I consider myself part of the "liberal groupthink" he so insultingly refers to.
I would
if it weren't so tragic. 
Now I believe we are looking at the XL pipeline being okayed, the safety nets cut for seniors, schools finally privatized, more troops sent to our wars around the world.
The TPP will be fast tracked, it is in BOTH parties 2012 platform and Obama is currently on his way to China to press for it.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/11/07/road-ahead-president-obama-travels-asia-pacific
You would think people starved for information, would be reading this thread to learn more. I guess they all went to lunch or something.
I'll help keep this thread kicked so they don't miss it. 
I was depressed about the mid-terms, then this strange little group of self-appointed nobodies came along and had a major meltdown at the mention of a group of investment bankers...lifted my spirits a little watching them wriggle about in frustration as 99% of DUers laughed them out of the room.
Seem they are really stuck now, nobody bought their 'it's a meaningless term' bullshit, nobody bought their 'doesn't exist must be a conspiracy theory' bullshit, nobody bought their 'I can't use the internet to google something' bullshit.
ALL over the exposure of a group of libertarian investment bankers...which of course they hate, cuz you know they HATE libertarians...ayup.
Thank you for all your kind posts here. They have meant a lot to me through the years.
I just carry on...
Thank you.
you know to keep on just carrying on. I think we forget to tell people good things sometimes. 
Thank you again...
Always helps.
- And unfortunately, it's true.
K&R
A poll taken by the wallstreet journal and the ny times and the christian science monitor, together they showed that 75 percent of the public doesn't believe what they read in the newspapers anymore, the percentage who don't believe what they see on tv news is even higher, it's like 85 percent. We all know the bastards are lying to us and they get away with it because people are used to yes or no, every 4 years to give us the sense that democracy still exists they give us 2 goddamn motherfucking liars, I like shakespearian english, down to earth english that describes what I'm talking about. I don't like prissy little euphemisms, so they give us 2 goddamn motherfucking lying bastards sons of bitches and they say choose between them you are, you can have a choice, which lying bastard do you prefer to the other lying bastard?
Obviously, the faster we process information, the more rich and complex our models or glosses — our reality-tunnels — will become. Resistance to new information, however, has a strong neurological foundation in all animals, as indicated by studies of imprinting and conditioning. Most animals, including most domesticated primates (humans) show a truly staggering ability to "ignore" certain kinds of information — that which does not "fit" their imprinted/conditioned reality-tunnel. We generally call this "conservatism" or "stupidity", but it appears in all parts of the political spectrum, and in learned societies as well as in the Ku Klux Klan.
~Robert Anton Wilson, Quantum Psychology
Obviously, the faster we process information, the more rich and complex our models or glosses — our reality-tunnels — will become. Resistance to new information, however, has a strong neurological foundation in all animals, as indicated by studies of imprinting and conditioning. Most animals, including most domesticated primates (humans) show a truly staggering ability to "ignore" certain kinds of information — that which does not "fit" their imprinted/conditioned reality-tunnel. We generally call this "conservatism" or "stupidity", but it appears in all parts of the political spectrum, and in learned societies as well as in the Ku Klux Klan.
~Robert Anton Wilson, Quantum Psychology
It's sickening to see how some are trying to destroy the core of the Democratic Party and rewrite its time honored values for their own purpose - and gain.
You are a treasure, madfloridian. Thanks for your excellent posts over the years.
K&R
Madfloridian reminds me of an old school Democrat -- the kind with a backbone!! My kind of Democrat.
