Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

deminks

(11,014 posts)
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:10 PM Nov 2014

Breitbart's Attack On Obama Attorney General Nominee Goes After The Wrong Loretta Lynch

Members of the conservative media are attempting to scandalize President Obama's Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch by suggesting she was involved in the Whitewater investigations of the 1990s. However, the Loretta Lynch that played a bit role in Whitewater -- an investigation into fraudulent real estate deals that did not include any wrongdoing by the Clintons -- is a different person than Obama's attorney general nominee.

According to a November 8 Breitbart.com article by Warner Todd Huston, "few are talking about" the fact nominee Lynch "was part of Bill Clinton's Whitewater probe defense team in 1992." Huston pointed to a March 1992 New York Times article that "reported that Lynch was one of the Clintons' Whitewater defense attorneys as well as a 'campaign aide.'" And in a November 9 article Huston's colleague, Breitbart.com Senior Editor-at Large Joel Pollak wrote, "The connection to Whitewater ought to provide additional fodder for Republicans during Lynch's confirmation hearings":

The connection to Whitewater ought to provide additional fodder for Republicans during Lynch's confirmation hearings. It is odd that Obama chose someone so close to the Clintons--or perhaps not, given the prominent role played by Clinton insider John Podesta in the second term of the Obama White House. Lynch has been rewarded throughout her career for her political loyalty--not an unusual path up the career ladder for federal prosecutors, but certainly one that will allow the GOP, as well as Obama, to raise the political stakes.

(snip)

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/11/09/breitbarts-attack-on-obama-attorney-general-nom/201511



OOOpsie. Too bad the leader of the right wing noise machine can't seem to rachet it up a step.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breitbart's Attack On Obama Attorney General Nominee Goes After The Wrong Loretta Lynch (Original Post) deminks Nov 2014 OP
Wouldn't want to confuse them with mere FACTS! elleng Nov 2014 #1
I'm absolutely astounded. Truly. It's amazing. PDJane Nov 2014 #2
Bottom line,most of the Nut Jobs will say it's true. Wellstone ruled Nov 2014 #3
there goes Breitbart's reputation Enrique Nov 2014 #4
I was expecting them to go after Loretta Lynn. Ampersand Unicode Nov 2014 #5
Little Green Footballs blog right on top of this. madfloridian Nov 2014 #6
What difference does it make? gratuitous Nov 2014 #7
OMG. They are even stupider than we thought!! LOL OregonBlue Nov 2014 #8
Funny, they just assumed something and didn't do one once of research. Rex Nov 2014 #9
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. Bottom line,most of the Nut Jobs will say it's true.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 04:56 PM
Nov 2014

Watch this will be a Faux Noise and CNN piece.By night fall it will appear on NBC and ABC. Typical.

Ampersand Unicode

(503 posts)
5. I was expecting them to go after Loretta Lynn.
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:06 PM
Nov 2014

Breitbart headline (the Onion as source, of course):

"Obama Appoints Coal Miner's Daughter to Go After Actual Coal Miners and Take Their Guns"



I mean, it's not like they've ever let facts -- or correct names -- get in the way of a good rage spiral.

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
7. What difference does it make?
Sun Nov 9, 2014, 05:20 PM
Nov 2014

Now that it's "out there," the popular media now have no choice but to report what Breitbart's Lord of the Flies Kindergarten and Coprophage Center has said. So, what does the Obama administration have to say about this? Darrell Issa will call some hearings and we'll get to the bottom of this! Why isn't the President addressing this scandal? Is it too soon to talk impeachment? Oh, and since someone said the secret word (Whitewater), we should pre-emptively impeach Hillary Clinton.

Yeah, I can totally see it happening.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breitbart's Attack On Oba...