General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAmerica’s Pseudo-Democracy
from Consortium News:
Americas Pseudo-Democracy
November 15, 2014
U.S. pundits mock countries, like Iran or China, where candidates are screened before they go on the ballot, but America has a similar approach, with candidates needing approval from plutocrats and special interests. But thats just one problem of U.S. democracy, says Lawrence Davidson.
By Lawrence Davidson
Given the dangerous results of the recent election in the United States one that saw the Republicans, a right-wing party increasingly populated with neocon warmongers, reactionaries and plutocrats take control of both houses of Congress it might be time to take a look at a sober look at U.S. democracy.
We can begin be taking note of the generic observation made by Winston Churchill: Democracy is the worse form of government, except for all the other forms that have been tried from time to time. The implication here is that democracy is really not the God-blessed system so many of Americans take it to be.
For instance, the public in a democracy is just as vulnerable to manipulation by various elites and interest groups as are those in non-democratic environments. The difference is that a democracy has a built-in procedure that allows citizens to have second thoughts about past manipulation. Thus they can kick out the bastards they were originally persuaded to kick in even if it is often only to replace them with a new set of bastards.
This repeated procedure results in a time limit on the damage elected leaders can do. It is, of course, possible that democratically elected politicians can come close to ruining a nation (their own as well as others) even given their limited tenure. ...........(more)
The complete piece is at: http://consortiumnews.com/2014/11/15/americas-pseudo-democracy/
enough
(13,270 posts)quote>
There is a recent study by researchers at Princeton University that concludes that the U.S. is no longer a democracy of voting citizens. Rather, it is an oligarchy of rich, well-connected individuals on the political scene [who] now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or even against the will of the majority of voters.
My take on this is only slightly different. Long ago I came to the conclusion that the United States was in fact a democracy of competing interest groups whose parochial goals override the national interest and/or those of ordinary citizens.
The average voter is an important constituent of his congressperson, senator, governor, or even mayor only for that short period of time when he or she must be convinced to cast a ballot. When that time is over, the voter recedes into the background and the real constituents are now powerful interest groups with the money to buy political access and influence. Those who control and represent these interest groups are part of this countrys ruling oligarchy.
Such is the pseudo-democracy most Americans hold so dear. It still has its virtues relative to more authoritarian forms of rule. However, these too may be shrinking. After 9/11 the rule of law and freedom of speech in the U.S. have been compromised. You can still write an essay like this one, but if you work for the government or the mainstream press and divulge the governments criminal excesses, you are likely to end up in jail or exile. These are precarious times and they dont show American democracy in a very good light a sobering picture indeed.
end>