Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Archae

(46,337 posts)
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:11 PM Nov 2014

Wingnut congresscritter defends committee chairs all being white males...

By saying absolutely nothing, of course, with lots of words.

(Politico) House Majority Whip Steve Scalise on Wednesday defended the GOP’s lack of women lawmakers as committee chairs in the new Congress. SCALISE: “Obviously, we have a number of other women that are very talented as part of our conference leadership. But if you look at this new class, especially, such a great, new, diverse group of members, with great backgrounds, too. And they’re going to come and, I think, and give us a really strong boost in the new Congress."

http://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2014/11/house-gop-whip-scalise-defends-all

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wingnut congresscritter defends committee chairs all being white males... (Original Post) Archae Nov 2014 OP
Need to put the brakes on this white-male stigmatization Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #1
. LeftyMom Nov 2014 #3
Or ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #4
Good response, thanks. Scuba Nov 2014 #8
Speaking as a middle-aged straight white male hifiguy Nov 2014 #5
If race- and gender-based attacks are considered acceptable Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #10
How is noting the complete absence of ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #12
The calling-out implies it's a problem to be white and male Man from Pickens Nov 2014 #14
Doesn't that 37% number suggest to you ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #15
there is something wrong when leadership is all white and all male. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2014 #16
High Roads have never moved..... BronxBoy Nov 2014 #18
lol La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2014 #9
Oh, the poor put upon white man.... tenderfoot Nov 2014 #17
Nobody said there was something wrong with being a white male, but you know that already. Rex Nov 2014 #19
Haha... not on this board. LostInAnomie Nov 2014 #21
Wake-up Folks Wellstone ruled Nov 2014 #2
Well, in all fairness, madamesilverspurs Nov 2014 #6
In Republican circles "diverse" means some of the white guys are bald. Scuba Nov 2014 #7
Or, fat ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #13
Give them a break LondonReign2 Nov 2014 #11
I'm confused. k2qb3 Nov 2014 #20
I am not sure that Captain Bourbonaotor's orange hifiguy Nov 2014 #22
 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
1. Need to put the brakes on this white-male stigmatization
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:34 PM
Nov 2014

If you hadn't noticed, the party got absolutely wrecked in the white male demographic, with the trend strongly against us. Pointing out that the chairs are white males sends a message that the Democratic Party specifically doesn't like white males. Makes it a really tough sell trying to overcome these election results.

Nobody had a problem with white male Harry Reid running the Senate. Try this instead: the real problem is that they're all Republicans. And that is not going to change by giving the impression that there is something unfixably wrong with being a white male.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
4. Or ...
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:00 PM
Nov 2014
Pointing out that the chairs are white males sends a message that the Democratic Party specifically doesn't like white males.


The message COULD be interpreted, not as any anti-white male message; but rather, as the republican's out reach to non-white/non-males is failing miserably.

Nobody had a problem with white male Harry Reid running the Senate.


Might that be because, 1) He has some non-white/non-males on his leadership team; but more, 2) because he (and his Party) doesn't have a reputation of being hostile to non-white/non-males.
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. Speaking as a middle-aged straight white male
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 03:23 PM
Nov 2014

who happens to be a Democratic Socialist, I think the real problem is with the cave troll mindset of so many others in the demographic. You sure you're on the right board, Tex?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
10. If race- and gender-based attacks are considered acceptable
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:44 PM
Nov 2014

then maybe not.

The high road is arguments on policy.

The gutter on the low road is arguing about what color and gender people are.

I take only high roads. If you prefer the low one, have a nice trip, send a postcard.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
12. How is noting the complete absence of ...
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:58 PM
Nov 2014

women and PoC on the leadership team of a Party/group that has very publicly expressed a need to do better outreach to women and PoC, an attack on white men?

 

Man from Pickens

(1,713 posts)
14. The calling-out implies it's a problem to be white and male
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 05:50 PM
Nov 2014

After all, if it's not a problem, why call it out?

I can't believe I'm the only one who can see the horrible. offensive, gutter politics involved in these tactics. If it were any other race or gender being called out like this, it would cause an uproar.

But regardless if one sees it or not, the consequences are so very real:
http://politicalwire.com/2014/11/06/white-men-were-the-decisive-vote/

This is a 37% share of the electorate we're talking about. Offending even a small percentage of them with these types of tactics is electoral suicide. And what votes are won by these tactics? None that weren't already on board. It's a political loser, and it does serious damage to the Democratic Party.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
15. Doesn't that 37% number suggest to you ...
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:14 PM
Nov 2014

that your brethren are seeking to maintain the racial/gender status quo that has locked out everyone else? Isn't/shouldn't that be a problem?

But take heart ... In two years, the white males that abandoned the Democratic Party will not have to play on the same team as the Black guy.

BronxBoy

(2,286 posts)
18. High Roads have never moved.....
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:12 PM
Nov 2014

the "angry White male" demographic to do a damn thing to advance racial and sexual progress in this country. The "angry White male" demographic has made a it a practice to take the low road and to demean people on the basis of color and gender.

If you don't understand that, I'm sure there are plenty of folks here who can clue you in

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
19. Nobody said there was something wrong with being a white male, but you know that already.
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:16 PM
Nov 2014

We said there is a problem when ALL the seats are held by white men...nice try, I will give you a sold B for effort.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. Wake-up Folks
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 02:53 PM
Nov 2014

This was the end game of the Rethugs all along. Keep harping about OPTICS. When you deal with a Wonk Social Group or the Old White Guy Group and you want to justify getting reelected this is the end game. The Rethugs learned via focus groups(Frank Luntz)what sells and what does not. Millions have been spent on consultants to prove this as fact and the Thugs are going to continue to focus on Whitie and F---- anyone who isn't white. Payback to Koch Bros,Chamber of Commerce,right wing Media, and of course the Wing Nut Churches. All for the most part are White Male dominated organizations.

madamesilverspurs

(15,805 posts)
6. Well, in all fairness,
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:15 PM
Nov 2014

Scalise did perform a rather spot-on channeling of a distaff Republican as he blathered a word-salad worthy of Ms. Palin herself . . .

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
11. Give them a break
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 04:50 PM
Nov 2014

First, there are only while male members in the Republican House, so they didn't have much choice, did they?

And if there do happen to be womenfolk or people of color around, these guys assume they are the help.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wingnut congresscritter d...