Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:43 PM Nov 2014

Income Inequality versus Income Inequity ...

the "AL" makes a big difference to successfully framing the message. (and it is driving me nuts)

Income Inequality, literally, means everyone doesn't have/get the same (in terms of income); whereas, Income Inequity, means there is an unfairness in the way income is distributed.

Here's an experiment that you can try to discover this point:

Find the most illiterate, stupid person you can know and ask them: should the founder, or a high powered Executive, of {Insert Company Name here} be paid the same amount as the {Insert their job title}? You know the answer you will receive ... very few will answer in the affirmative. Then, ask them should the employee that spends their day looking for any and every way to avoid doing the work they were hired to do, when they even bother to show up for work, be paid the same as the hardest worker in the company?

Now ... ask that same person should the founder, or a high powered Executive, of {Insert Company Name here} be paid 1,000 time (or, 500 times, or even 100 times) what the {Insert their job title} is paid?

Everyone/most people understand there will/should be differences in pay/income, based on one's efforts, contributions, education, etc.; but, even in those difference, everyone/most recognizes that there should be some balance/relationship in pay.

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Income Inequality versus Income Inequity ... (Original Post) 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 OP
That used to bother me, too daredtowork Nov 2014 #1
The rubes who vote Repub don't know... Wounded Bear Nov 2014 #2
using income maldistribution would unobfuscate the issue. Agony Nov 2014 #3
Unfair pay rates? Jackpine Radical Nov 2014 #4

daredtowork

(3,732 posts)
1. That used to bother me, too
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:54 PM
Nov 2014

When people started throwing around the term "inequality" a few years ago - what, around the time of the Occupy movement? - it did bother me because I thought this would be swiftly dismissed as socialism - or worse - communism. What could be more utopian communist than the image of giving everyone an "equal" share.

However, no one seems to have raised a big "socialist" fuss about "inequality". In fact people seem to be a lot more comfortable with the term "inequality" than "socialism". Perhaps because "equality" evokes the natural rights of man in Declaration of Independence and our Constitutional equalities. Anyway - pundits have been using "Income Inequality" for a number of years now and the term has stuck. You had better get used to it.

You have about as much chance of making "Income Inequity" happen as Gretchen making "fetch" happen in Mean Girls.

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)
2. The rubes who vote Repub don't know...
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 06:55 PM
Nov 2014

the difference between empathy and sympathy. You think they'll get this?

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
4. Unfair pay rates?
Wed Nov 19, 2014, 07:11 PM
Nov 2014

I well take your point, & am looking for simpler or more visualizable ways of saying "inequity."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Income Inequality versus ...