Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrat BUSTS REPUBLICANS For Trying To BURY Benghazi Report That DEBUNKS THEIR LIES
WE should be banging the Benghazi drum now AFTER reTHUGS wasted tax-payer monies on tin-foil-hat conspiracies......
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) busted House Republicans for trying to bury their own Benghazi report by releasing on the Friday night before the Thanksgiving holiday.
Transcript via CNN:
REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D), CALIFORNIA: Well, I have great respect for Lindsey.
But it reminds me of a lawyers maxim that, if the law is not on your side, emphasize the facts. If the facts arent on your side, bang on the table. I think we heard Lindsey banging on the table quite a bit this morning.
This was a two-year exhaustive investigation. It was released by the Republican chairman of the Intelligence Committee and had the support of all the Republicans and Democrats on the committee. Its designed to be the definitive word on what happened from the intelligence communitys point of view.
And nothing I think Lindsey said at all contradicts what is in that report. And calling it crap doesnt change the fact that it was an exhaustive and objective review. So, I think we have had really the final word on many of these conspiracy theories, on the fact there was no stand-down order, there was no political interference, there was no effort to politically spin the talking points.
In fact, as the report points out, there were 21 intelligence assessments at the time that it began as a protest. Those turned out to be wrong, but there was no malice in getting it wrong.
BORGER: So, do you think the
SCHIFF: And I hope that this will guide the select committee.
BORGER: Well, do you think the the
SCHIFF: And, you know, I think the yes.
BORGER: the administration is exonerated here?
SCHIFF: I think it is exonerated, certainly not the in the sense that it shows there was adequate security at the diplomatic facility. There wasnt. Theres been no contesting that. But in terms of whether there was an effort to cover up or spin
or illegal trafficking of arms by the CIA or any of those conspiracies
BORGER: Well
SCHIFF: they have been completely vindicated.
And I hope really, the only interesting question here, but it answers itself, is, why is this report being released on the Friday before Thanksgiving? Why is it being released in between major developments on immigration and Iran?
BORGER: So, you think it was kind of a dump? So you think it was a dump, so no one would pay attention to it?
SCHIFF: Oh, absolutely, absolutely. Exactly.
BORGER: We are.
SCHIFF: When you spend two years doing the definitive report, you want to trumpet it to the high heavens. You dont want to bury it on the Friday before Thanksgiving.
BORGER: But let me
SCHIFF: But I will tell you this. If the yes. If the select committee comes up with a similar conclusion, it will release its report on Christmas Eve.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1411/23/sotu.01.html
House Republicans tried to dump the report on a Friday night before a holiday in the attempt to bury it so that nobody would notice that their own committee did not find any evidence to prove their baseless conspiracy theories. Rep. Schiff was correct. If the House Select Committee on Benghazi finds no evidence of wrongdoing, that report will be released sometime before hell freezes over. Benghazi has become such an ingrained myth within the Republican Party that Sen. Lindsey Graham when straight Benghazi truther when confronted with reality on CNN. Benghazi is their great Republican hope for defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016. It doesnt matter to the GOP if 1,000 investigations find no wrong doing. Republicans will still try to smear Hillary Clinton with their Benghazi tall tales.
Republicans tried to bury their latest Benghazi black eye, but they failed. The American people have never bought into the scandal because their BS detector tells them that there is nothing to see here. Republicans dont care that they sound crazy every time they mention Benghazi. They are convinced that they can win with a conspiracy theory, so reality be damned, and full steam ahead to a special investigation into Benghazi.
http://www.politicususa.com/2014/11/23/democrat-busts-republicans-bury-benghazi-report-debunks-lies.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2117 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (61)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Democrat BUSTS REPUBLICANS For Trying To BURY Benghazi Report That DEBUNKS THEIR LIES (Original Post)
Segami
Nov 2014
OP
Wella
(1,827 posts)1. The Benghazi Brief concludes that actions surrounding the Benghazi situation were legal
That no crimes were committed.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)2. Republican definition...Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)4. Benghazi = Obama's Swift Boating
WillyT
(72,631 posts)5. K & R !!!
allinthegame
(132 posts)6. Bravo
To my Congressman Adam Schiff for taking the lead on pushing back!
blackspade
(10,056 posts)7. This exchange stood out to me...
BORGER: OK.
And I under -- I understand that, and you have said that the State Department needs to do more to make sure there's not another Benghazi. But let me get to this question of intelligence failure, because this report says that there wasn't intelligence failure, there were just gaps in intelligence.
But if there was an increased threat environment, but no uptick in security, isn't that an intelligence failure?
SCHIFF: Well, Gloria, what the report says is that there were intelligence leads, that there were deteriorating security climate, and then, in fact, the CIA annex took additional precautions to make that facility more safe.
Now, I think it is fair to ask the question, though, did the intelligence community miss something?
BORGER: Right.
SCHIFF: In other words, there wasn't intelligence -- specific intelligence that there was going to be an attack. And, in that sense, the agencies didn't -- fail to advise policy-makers of an imminent threat.
But I think it's fair to say or fair to ask, should we have seen this coming, should we have gathered intelligence? And I don't know that we have reached a definitive conclusion on that.
BORGER: OK. And...
SCHIFF: Is there something that we missed that we should have seen.
The framing of Borger's question is nonsensical.
She sets up the question by talking about security laxity, but finishes at an intelligence failure.
If the security wasn't strengthened, by security, then how is that an intelligence failure?
I think Schiff does a pretty good job this out.
Cha
(297,137 posts)8. Lindsey's doin' his part to make sure it stays in the news..