General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe NATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION questions grand jury decision, calls on DOJ to act
President Meanes is requesting that the citizens of Ferguson, Missouri not allow this decision to cause an unnecessary uproar in the community that could lead to arrests, injuries or even deaths of innocent people. I am asking for everyone to remain as calm as possible and to join in solidarity as we continue to support the family of Michael Brown and put our legal plan into full effect says President Meanes I feel the magnitude of the grand jurys ruling as Ferguson, Missouri is only minutes from where I reside, adds President Meanes.
Over the last couple of months, the National Bar Association has hosted Town Hall meetings informing attendees of their Fourth Amendment (Search & Seizure) constitutional rights, whether it is legal to record police activity, and how citizens should behave/respond if and when they interface with police officers. The death of Michael Brown was the last straw and the catalyst for addressing issues of inequality and racial bias in policing, the justice system, and violence against members of minority communities, states Pamela Meanes.
The family of Michael Brown requested that District Attorney McCullough step aside and allow a special prosecutor be assigned to the investigation to give the community confidence that the grand jury would conduct a complete and thorough investigation into the tragic shooting death of 18 year old Michael Brown. The grand jurys decision confirms the fear that many expressed months ago that a fair and impartial investigation would not happen.
The National Bar Association is adamant about our desire for transformative justice. While we are disappointed with the grand jurys ruling, we are promoting peace on every street corner around the world. The only way to foster systemic change is to organize, educate, and mobilize. We are imploring everyone to fight against the injustice in Ferguson, Missouri and throughout the United States by banding together and working within the confines of the law, states President Meanes.
http://us7.campaign-archive1.com/?u=b493e6c4d31beda32fdaf8e2d&id=73514e334b
badtoworse
(5,957 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)so we just have to wait and see. when this type of racist violence, which is what i would was happening in the south in the 60's the fed had to step in. several KKK members/cops were tried for civil rights violations for the murders they committed.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)in order to bring such charges, the DoJ would have to be able to prove that wilson shoot Michael BECAUSE of Michael being Black (or that it was a contributing factor) ... This is where Anonymous' claim that wilson is/was a part of a "Goon Squad", i.e., L/E that have connects to the kkk, is/will prove important ... should they come up with the proof.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)it seems that place has a lot of KKK members.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and then what? At the very least the dept. black/white ratios should reflect the community it "serves and protects".
jwirr
(39,215 posts)investigation into the community by the same fed department? What can they accomplish with that? It investigates the whole administration including the police department.
I also know that the family can sue for a wrongful death. Will that be against Wilson, the FPD and the city?
Are these the only means of getting justice now that the GJ has failed?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Leopolds Ghost
(12,875 posts)What with releasing the name of the wrong police officer (who wasn't even an officer) and all... and for the wrong reasons... but maybe there's other "research" being done on this by more responsible parties out there... I dunno.
I'd like to believe that there's a conspiracy by KKK to infiltrate the police but given how red exurban Missouri is, especially on race, or perhaps how red most of rural America is PARTICULARLY BECAUSE of race (look at Kentucky's Democratic candidate proclaiming herself a Hillary Democrat as if to imply she could never vote for a black man over a white woman in 2008, or rural MD turning out to vote against a black person in the governor's race there) I suspect it doesn't take a conspiracy.
Not when you have first responders getting on Washington Post bulletin boards (never mind reddit!) in the wake of Katrina bragging about how they had the power back on while people were still dying across the river and how glad they were "those people" weren't being allowed to cross the bridge and escape and potentially "loot our community".
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Stallion
(6,474 posts)the recognized national organization of Attorneys is the American Bar Association (ABA). I've practiced law for 30 years and never heard of it.
johnnyreb
(915 posts)http://www.nationalbar.org/about-us.html
padfun
(1,786 posts)It's been around for a long time
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bar_Association
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)to NOT have come across the group? Every Law School and major city in the U.S. has a Chapter.
Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #10)
Je me souviens This message was self-deleted by its author.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)We pick up on stuff like that.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)oppression.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i think you are referring to the teabaggers.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)Ykcutnek
(1,305 posts)But I admit I did have them confused when I started this thread.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)made to feel intimidatedwhich affected their vote? I'm sure there was a huge police presence at that building.
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)It's a County Grand Jury.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)presence there. I think it could be used as a tool to sway jurors.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)"The grand jurys decision confirms the fear that many expressed months ago that a fair and impartial investigation would not happen."
As an attorney myself I strongly dislike the wording on this. This seems to imply that a fair and impartial investigation can only come to one conclusion/decision: the one we want.
If our standard for whether a fair and impartial investigation occurred is whether we like the final outcome, then what's the purpose of having a legal system at all?
If the National Bar Association purports to represent those in the legal profession they're not doing a very good job with this statement.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the facts, if not the conduct of the "prosecutor", suggest that anything other than a "fair and impartial" process occurred here (again).
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)clearly, the group doesn't think it was. and i think that perception is a huge part of the problem. the police, the medical examiner, and the prosecutor did not do much to change that perception. in fact, they created the perception.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)And the "prosecutor's" press conference sounded a lot like a defense attorney's closing argument.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)and Mike Brown, like Trayvon Martin, was "responsible" for happened to him. if only he didn't look like a "demon" while "defying" a white man
gollygee
(22,336 posts)who grunted. I can't believe that level of dehumanization of a victim was presented by a prosecutor at a grand jury. Darren Wilson wasn't indicted but Michael Brown appears to have been.
Shameful.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)and it clearly shows you what his agenda was: to blame the victim for his own death. and blame the social media and anything and everything else for FAILING to do his job.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)I don't know anything about the individual members of the grand jury but I suspect they did the best with the information they had, but the process of gathering information, etc. leading up to their deliberations appears to have been shoddy as hell.
The issue expressed in my post is with a loud, impactful and definitive statement on behalf of tens of thousands of legal professionals of color, whose wording actually does a dis-service to the work done by those in its membership. As a person of color I could be in the National Bar Association. I chose (and actively choose) membership in the American Bar Association instead because of examples like this; the NBA consistently says things that seem to more represent a mindset than it does a group of people.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)the investigation was not fair or impartial, and you agree that it wasn't...then how could the grand jury possibly return a fair and impartial ruling based on evidence from an unfair and partial investigation?
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)Saying that a grand jury's decision confirms that the process wasn't fair and impartial is another thing, which is exactly what the NBA said:
""The grand jurys decision confirms the fear...that a fair and impartial investigation would not happen."
I'm simply saying that as a legal professional it's improper and misleading to imply that any legal decision that is not to our liking is confirmation that the legal process was somehow unfair, corrupt, or impartial.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)i think you are splitting hairs, though, since you admit the investigation was not fair or impartial. it seems to me: they were right. i am black myself, so i do understand the mistrust of the system. it has never really worked very well for us.
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)but only because words are meaningful and have consequences. This isn't just a random comment by a single individual; it was made on behalf of tens of thousands of legal professionals and as such should have been carefully considered before being released.
As I mentioned I am not a member of the NBA, but predictably many of my peers assume I am. I do not wish to be part of a blanket statement that implies that all legal professionals of color believe that only preferred legal outcomes are legitimate.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)legal professionals have done nothing but muddy the water during this whole process and you're in your finest hour now. Shameful behavior from a 'legal professional'. Shameful!!!!!!
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)And I do my very best to give these folks the high quality services they deserve. Please take your abuse and shaming of the legal field elsewhere.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I wouldn't shame the legal profession or abuse the legal profession. What's wrong with you? geez
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)you don't like 1 of the 3000+ county prosecutors in this country.
Yes, that's shaming, abusive, and unnecessary.
Grow up.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)Last edited Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:48 PM - Edit history (1)
not shaming the legal profession per se. You should try to be mature yourself. I wouldn't want you in court with me with your obfuscation. More than 1 I don't like or trust. This 'justice system' is corrupt and putrid and the laws biased and applied unequally. You can sound like the victim under the bus, but you're driving a bus that is an accident waiting to happen and lets racist murderers walk free in MANY states. Good luck on your chosen profession.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)they met while working at a law firm called Sidley Austin, don't you? The poster you are attacking works for a legal clinic for poor people. Sidley Austin is a global mega firm with 18 offices serving corporate and very wealthy clients generating a billion in income a year.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)I'm not attacking that person, I disagree with their conclusions about Michael Brown. I give a wit less about BO and MO and where they met or who they worked with.....hope the person working for poor people finds the satisfaction they are looking for. They can still be wrong about this case and I still won't trust any lawyer any further than I can throw them. I was fffffed over in a very important case because I couldn't come up with some goddam money for that lawyer, that was requested AFTER I had already paid a large amount. This request was 2 days before my hearing and at a time I was financially struggling. I was just dumped by this individual. Had to settle for the pittance offered on the case. It has affected my whole life. So I don't really care who works where and with whom as lawyers, I just know they are not to be trusted.
staggerleem
(469 posts)... a couple of years ago, and I can tell you that the way the prosecuting attorney chooses to present the evidence can make the difference between an indictment and exoneration. It's been ABUNDANTLY clear that this prosecutor is about as far from impartial as a person can get. He chose to de-humanize the victim.
When the National Guard was activated & deployed to Ferguson on Friday, I was about 95% sure that the "No Indictment" decision had already been reached. Within a minute of the start of last night's press conference, that 5% of doubt was erased.
noiretextatique
(27,275 posts)and that prosecutor should never have presented the case. if there ever was a need for a special prosecutor...this was it. welcome to DU
jwirr
(39,215 posts)is enough to decide that there should be no trial? And you call that fair and impartial?
MadDAsHell
(2,067 posts)they're fairly clear.
0rganism
(23,944 posts)That's a major takeaway from this situation -- the DA is way too tight with the cops to the point of being absolutely unwilling to push for an indictment, aka doing his job. Disbarring him would be a fair start to what's looking like a lengthy process of reconciliation.
gordianot
(15,237 posts)asjr
(10,479 posts)what I would consider an "equal" jury. There is no doubt in my mind how this case was handled. This has been a tragedy for our entire country. There must be something that can be done to reverse the choice of prosecutor when something like this happens again--and it will.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)The Grand Jury pool is supposed to reflect the demographics of the area, so it will be for St Louis County as a whole, not just the town of Ferguson.
http://www.stlouiscopa.com/Divisions.aspx?ID=151
http://www.mow.uscourts.gov/district/jury/grand_jury_service.html
http://www.moga.mo.gov/statutes/C500-599/5400000021.HTM
The master jury duty list, from which grand jurors and regular jurors are selected is made up from a combination of registered voters and those that have a driver's license.
http://www.courts.mo.gov/hosted/circuit13/juryinfo/juryfaqs.htm
The grand jury was 25% black, which means they are proportionately representing the demographics of St Louis County
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis_County,_Missouri#Demographics
asjr
(10,479 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Mainly because they didn't like some of the asshole judges that were on their wish list.
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)I had never heard of the NBA until today.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)grossproffit
(5,591 posts)I walked right into that one. LOL!
ctaylors6
(693 posts)I posted this somewhere else, but I'm frustrated I can't find more information about this. I've started reading the transcripts, and McCulloch isn't the one questioning the witnesses; two other people are - Ms. Whirley and Ms. Alizadeh.
After some googling, I found and read this article:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-atypical-approach-grand-jury-in-ferguson-shooting-receives-full-measure-of-case/2014/09/07/1dec6ffe-339b-11e4-8f02-03c644b2d7d0_story.html
It says: "McCulloch declined to step aside, but he is not presenting evidence to the grand jury, which usually means he wont try the case himself, Magee said. But he is supervising the two attorneys in his office Sheila Whirley and Kathi Alizadeh who are presenting to the grand jury."
The article is dated 9/7. Does anyone know if Whirley and Alizadeh presented all the evidence or if McCulloch stepped in at some point? I'm not saying it made difference to outcome, but it just surprised me that I hadn't heard about this before today. I can't find very much information about the 2 assistant prosecutors and their role. It seems like every article refers to McCulloch only like these other two don't exist.
Thank you so much!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)...the American Bar Association.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)The Bar Assoc could see what a sham this was probably more clearly than most,
they totally saw this coming and had already quietly decided internally before the
announcement by the President of Backstoppers that raised over $400,000 for
Officer Darren Wilson .. oh, I mean that racist posing as "The Prosecutor"
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)He could barely contain himself. Almost laughing at times.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)comes out against a DA.
Quixote1818
(28,929 posts)libodem
(19,288 posts)Maybe God isn't dead.